actually he is the poster boy example of what can happen if one drops out of high school
Climate Change
- Thread starter Addict2sex
- Start date
sea level rise is approx 1.5 millimeters per year
about the same as before the climate change lunacy despite rising co2
no detectable acceleration in sea-level trend
like i said
one will be able to adjust to the naturally occurring sea level rise that might occur in a lifetime by taking a half step back from the surf
about the same as before the climate change lunacy despite rising co2
no detectable acceleration in sea-level trend
like i said
one will be able to adjust to the naturally occurring sea level rise that might occur in a lifetime by taking a half step back from the surf
Attachments
Last edited:
No, you answered as if the only way to measure temp and sea levels is if someone is personally there.
You ignore so much of paleoclimatology.
Oh lordy, you really don't have a clue what you're talking about, do you?
Signs found of worryingly fast Antarctic ice melt - New Zealand expedition
Scientists returning from a voyage into Antarctic waters say they found worrying evidence about how much ice has melted and how quickly.
www.rnz.co.nz
Your chart shows sea level increase despite using intentionally different scales for sea level and CO2.
what the hell is wrong with you ?
the question was
"Were they measuring sea levels back then? " in reference to the timing of the invention of the internal combustion engine
the question was not
'detail all the potential measurement techniques that could possibly be used to measure sea levels including geological techniques'
I even added a reference to multiple ice ages, which by definition means noone was personally there
your new Zealand propaganda piece refers to sea ice
and once again you demonstrative how you do not have the first clue about science
floating ice has no effect on volume when it melts
1. Antarctica is a vast ice-covered landmass surrounded by sea (unlike the Arctic, which is an ice-covered ocean surrounded by land).
98% is on land
2. The distribution of precipitation over Antarctica is very marked, with several metres of snow falling each year near the coast but the interior only getting an annual snowfall of a few centimetres,
3. do you not understand what -57C means when you babble about Antarctic glacial melt ?
your twitter propaganda piece uses the if word
if my aunt had balls she would be my uncle
when's your next clown show ?
Last edited:
You are totally clueless about sea level measurements yet seem to think you know more than all of the IPCC.
Its really quite amazing how you've talked yourself into believing that you are more expert than all of NASA, the AAS and the IPCC.
You have no clue about science, legit sources or research.
The best you can do is post 30 year old charts from retired geologists or physicists and then claim they are experts in climatology.
Why on earth would you think you know more than NASA?
Why on earth do you call every legit and current scientific source 'propaganda'?
Climate Change - NASA Science
NASA is a global leader in studying Earth’s changing climate.
climate.nasa.gov
All he said was 2 ifs and no butsNo, you answered as if the only way to measure temp and sea levels is if someone is personally there.
You ignore so much of paleoclimatology.
Oh lordy, you really don't have a clue what you're talking about, do you?
Signs found of worryingly fast Antarctic ice melt - New Zealand expedition
Scientists returning from a voyage into Antarctic waters say they found worrying evidence about how much ice has melted and how quickly.
and the frankfooter clown show appears again
what part of this do you fail to comprehend
The average temperature in the interior throughout the year is about -57°C, with the minimum temperature being -90°C during the winter season.
the continent is frozen 99% of the time
98% of the glacier is on land
floating ice does not affect volume if it melts
JOHN CLAUSER, 2022 PHYSICS NOBEL PRIZE WINNER:
polar bear extinction
ocean acidification
coral bleaching
droughts / floods
wild fires
more / less snow
extreme weather events
global boiling
crop failure
catastrophic sea level rise
all broken hockey sticks and evil propaganda lies
the con has not worked
your perverted evil dream of a socialism / communism world order is not going to be achieved via climate change propaganda
what part of this do you fail to comprehend
The average temperature in the interior throughout the year is about -57°C, with the minimum temperature being -90°C during the winter season.
the continent is frozen 99% of the time
98% of the glacier is on land
floating ice does not affect volume if it melts
JOHN CLAUSER, 2022 PHYSICS NOBEL PRIZE WINNER:
polar bear extinction
ocean acidification
coral bleaching
droughts / floods
wild fires
more / less snow
extreme weather events
global boiling
crop failure
catastrophic sea level rise
all broken hockey sticks and evil propaganda lies
the con has not worked
your perverted evil dream of a socialism / communism world order is not going to be achieved via climate change propaganda
Last edited:
Why do you keep repeating the same stupid comment about how cold the interior of Antarctica when the discussion about sea level change is from coastal glaciers, where sea and ice meet and melting glaciers could massively increase sea levels?
Are you unable to read and comprehend?
Do some basic research on the Thwaites Glacier and see if you can actually post on the subject at hand, and not repeat about how cold it is in the interior.
This CNN piece, which I'm sure you'll instantly declare propaganda, is a good basic post on what it is, what the risks are and what we know.
The ‘Doomsday Glacier’ is rapidly melting. Scientists now have evidence for when it started and why
my god you are stunned
The continent is frozen 99% of the time
The continent is frozen 99% of the time
Surface temperature of Antarctica in winter and summer from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts
nothing above zero
did you drop out of school before the lesson where they teach you ice requires temperatures above zero in order to melt?
CNN ?
loonie left central
what part of this do you fail to comprehend
The average temperature in the interior throughout the year is about -57°C, with the minimum temperature being -90°C during the winter season.
the continent is frozen 99% of the time
98% of the glacier is on land
floating ice does not affect volume if it melts
JOHN CLAUSER, 2022 PHYSICS NOBEL PRIZE WINNER:
polar bear extinction
ocean acidification
coral bleaching
droughts / floods
wild fires
more / less snow
extreme weather events
global boiling
crop failure
catastrophic sea level rise
all broken hockey sticks and evil propaganda lies
the con has not worked
your perverted evil dream of a socialism / communism world order is not going to be achieved via climate change propaganda
Last edited:
So you wouldn't read the article because it was on CNN.
But you also refuse to post sources for your information.
Try these, perhaps there is a scientific source you won't call 'propaganda' at the same time you say slamming scientists is bad.
Scientific America
Antarctica's 'Doomsday Glacier' May Be More Prone to Melting Than Expected
Antarctica’s massive Thwaites Glacier is melting more slowly than previously thought but also may be more susceptible to even small amounts of ice loss
Nature:
Heterogeneous melting near the Thwaites Glacier grounding line - Nature
Thwaites Eastern Ice Shelf observations from a new underwater vehicle show that high melt rates occur where ice is sharply sloped at the ocean interface, with lower melt where the ice is comparatively flat.
www.nature.com
Reuters:
Warm water melts weak spots on Antarctica's 'Doomsday Glacier,' say scientists
Scientists studying Antarctica's vast Thwaites Glacier - nicknamed the Doomsday Glacier - say warm water is seeping into its weak spots, worsening melting caused by rising temperatures, two papers published in Nature journal showed on Wednesday.
www.reuters.com
If you think all these are propaganda please list a scientific source you actually trust.
Highlights? Mad Magazine? Stormfront?So you wouldn't read the article because it was on CNN.
But you also refuse to post sources for your information.
Try these, perhaps there is a scientific source you won't call 'propaganda' at the same time you say slamming scientists is bad.
Scientific America
Antarctica's 'Doomsday Glacier' May Be More Prone to Melting Than Expected
Antarctica’s massive Thwaites Glacier is melting more slowly than previously thought but also may be more susceptible to even small amounts of ice losswww.scientificamerican.com
Nature:
Heterogeneous melting near the Thwaites Glacier grounding line - Nature
Thwaites Eastern Ice Shelf observations from a new underwater vehicle show that high melt rates occur where ice is sharply sloped at the ocean interface, with lower melt where the ice is comparatively flat.
Reuters:
Warm water melts weak spots on Antarctica's 'Doomsday Glacier,' say scientists
Scientists studying Antarctica's vast Thwaites Glacier - nicknamed the Doomsday Glacier - say warm water is seeping into its weak spots, worsening melting caused by rising temperatures, two papers published in Nature journal showed on Wednesday.
If you think all these are propaganda please list a scientific source you actually trust.
No
I just ignore you for a while
keeping the exposure to a minimum , just in case whatever is wrong with you might be contagious
You run away as you can't actually argue the science.
All you can do is post the same old charts while ignoring the news.
JOHN CLAUSER, 2022 PHYSICS NOBEL PRIZE WINNER:
polar bear extinction
ocean acidification
coral bleaching
droughts / floods
wild fires
more / less snow
extreme weather events
global boiling
crop failure
catastrophic sea level rise
all broken hockey sticks and evil propaganda lies
the con has not worked
polar bear extinction
ocean acidification
coral bleaching
droughts / floods
wild fires
more / less snow
extreme weather events
global boiling
crop failure
catastrophic sea level rise
all broken hockey sticks and evil propaganda lies
the con has not worked
Outside of their mission of warning sheeple of the impending
climate catastrophe on the purpose of scoring political gain or
virtue signalling climate alarmists mostly don't actually live life
like there is an emergency. Carbon emission will continue rising
and alarmists will remain the happy people they are. As such
I think it is fruitless even for a scientist of such high calibre as Nobel
physicist to point out the obvious. If anything remarks
like 'there is no climate emergency' or 'we are not in a climate crisis'
would just play into the hands of climate activists or climate lunatics
like Steven Guilbeault. It only takes accusations like 'climate denial' or
'science denier' to convince climate sheeple the physicist is misguided.
The physicist would better focus on the algorithms and models employed
by climate scientists for their bogus prediction of the end of the world
as we know should carbon emission reach the point of no return within
this decade. But then climate sheeple are imbeciles who would not
likely be able to admit they've been duped.
climate catastrophe on the purpose of scoring political gain or
virtue signalling climate alarmists mostly don't actually live life
like there is an emergency. Carbon emission will continue rising
and alarmists will remain the happy people they are. As such
I think it is fruitless even for a scientist of such high calibre as Nobel
physicist to point out the obvious. If anything remarks
like 'there is no climate emergency' or 'we are not in a climate crisis'
would just play into the hands of climate activists or climate lunatics
like Steven Guilbeault. It only takes accusations like 'climate denial' or
'science denier' to convince climate sheeple the physicist is misguided.
The physicist would better focus on the algorithms and models employed
by climate scientists for their bogus prediction of the end of the world
as we know should carbon emission reach the point of no return within
this decade. But then climate sheeple are imbeciles who would not
likely be able to admit they've been duped.
You're back to cut and paste spamming, larue.
This always happens when you can't debate the facts.
Every single time.
The global temp is rising just like the IPCC warned.
Coral bleaching is hitting its 5th major event in 8 years.
Polar bears are struggling.
The oceans are acidifying.
Canadian farmers are struggling with drought in the prairies and floods elsewhere.
This was the warmest winter in Toronto/Canada.
Everything on your list is happening just as the IPCC projected.
no
it should never be fruitless for speaking the truth
hmm lets see
the truth as per a brilliant physicist , gets cancelled by a climate lunatic who does not / will not understand the scientific principals ?
now that is just plain wrong & in need of change
more fence sitting ?
The physicist is best to speak his mind whenever he chooses i.e. free speech
its tough for anyone to admit they have been duped
particularly when it questions the trust they have placed in public institutions
however that is irrelevant in scientific discovery of the truth
You've posted the opinions of this physicist as if they were science.
If he is so brilliant, post the research papers and data backing his claims.
If he is a scientist that has seriously studied the issue that should be easy to do.
After all, the thousands of scientists you keep trying assassinate characters all post their work, data and papers publicly so you can check them.
Where is the science?
