Climate Change

[Frankfooter]

and the frankfooter clown show appears again

what part of this do you fail to comprehend
The average temperature in the interior throughout the year is about -57°C, with the minimum temperature being -90°C during the winter season.
the continent is frozen 99% of the time
98% of the glacier is on land
floating ice does not affect volume if it melts

Why do you keep repeating the same stupid comment about how cold the interior of Antarctica when the discussion about sea level change is from coastal glaciers, where sea and ice meet and melting glaciers could massively increase sea levels?

Are you unable to read and comprehend?
Do some basic research on the Thwaites Glacier and see if you can actually post on the subject at hand, and not repeat about how cold it is in the interior.

This CNN piece, which I'm sure you'll instantly declare propaganda, is a good basic post on what it is, what the risks are and what we know.

The ‘Doomsday Glacier’ is rapidly melting. Scientists now have evidence for when it started and why

https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/26/climate/doomsday-glacier-antarctic-ice-melt-climate-intl/index.html

 

[JohnLarue]

Why do you keep repeating the same stupid comment about how cold the interior of Antarctica when the discussion about sea level change is from coastal glaciers, where sea and ice meet and melting glaciers could massively increase sea levels?

my god you are stunned
The continent is frozen 99% of the time

Are you unable to read and comprehend?
Do some basic research on the Thwaites Glacier and see if you can actually post on the subject at hand, and not repeat about how cold it is in the interior.

The continent is frozen 99% of the time
Surface temperature of Antarctica in winter and summer from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts


nothing above zero

did you drop out of school before the lesson where they teach you ice requires temperatures above zero in order to melt?

This CNN piece, which I'm sure you'll instantly declare propaganda, is a good basic post on what it is, what the risks are and what we know.

The ‘Doomsday Glacier’ is rapidly melting. Scientists now have evidence for when it started and why

https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/26/climate/doomsday-glacier-antarctic-ice-melt-climate-intl/index.html

CNN ?

loonie left central

what part of this do you fail to comprehend
The average temperature in the interior throughout the year is about -57°C, with the minimum temperature being -90°C during the winter season.
the continent is frozen 99% of the time
98% of the glacier is on land
floating ice does not affect volume if it melts


JOHN CLAUSER, 2022 PHYSICS NOBEL PRIZE WINNER:

"I can very confidently assert, there is NO climate emergency."
“As much as it may upset many people, my message is the planet is NOT in peril. … atmospheric CO2 and methane have negligible effect on the climate.

The policies government have been implementing are total unnecessary and should be eliminated.
So far, [we] have totally misidentified what is the dominant process in controlling the climate, and all of the various models are based on incomplete and incorrect physics.
The dominant process, is “the cloud-sunlight-reflexivity thermostat mechanism. Clouds are all bright white, and they reflected 90% of the sunlight back into space making them the most crucial yet most overlooked aspect of the climate system. Two-thirds of the Earth are ocean. The Pacific Ocean alone is half the Earth. The average cloud cover for the Earth is 67%; about 50% over land and 75% over oceans.
I claim that the above conspicuous properties of clouds are the missing part of the puzzle.

I can very confidently assert, there is no climate emergency."

polar bear extinction
ocean acidification
coral bleaching
droughts / floods
wild fires
more / less snow
extreme weather events
global boiling
crop failure
catastrophic sea level rise

all broken hockey sticks and evil propaganda lies

the con has not worked
your perverted evil dream of a socialism / communism world order is not going to be achieved via climate change propaganda

 

[Frankfooter]

CNN ?

loonie left central

So you wouldn't read the article because it was on CNN.
But you also refuse to post sources for your information.

Try these, perhaps there is a scientific source you won't call 'propaganda' at the same time you say slamming scientists is bad.
Scientific America

Antarctica's 'Doomsday Glacier' May Be More Prone to Melting Than Expected

Antarctica’s massive Thwaites Glacier is melting more slowly than previously thought but also may be more susceptible to even small amounts of ice loss

www.scientificamerican.com

Nature:

Heterogeneous melting near the Thwaites Glacier grounding line - Nature

Thwaites Eastern Ice Shelf observations from a new underwater vehicle show that high melt rates occur where ice is sharply sloped at the ocean interface, with lower melt where the ice is comparatively flat.

www.nature.com

Reuters:

Warm water melts weak spots on Antarctica's 'Doomsday Glacier,' say scientists

Scientists studying Antarctica's vast Thwaites Glacier - nicknamed the Doomsday Glacier - say warm water is seeping into its weak spots, worsening melting caused by rising temperatures, two papers published in Nature journal showed on Wednesday.

www.reuters.com

If you think all these are propaganda please list a scientific source you actually trust.

 

[y2kmark]

So you wouldn't read the article because it was on CNN.
But you also refuse to post sources for your information.

Try these, perhaps there is a scientific source you won't call 'propaganda' at the same time you say slamming scientists is bad.
Scientific America

Antarctica's 'Doomsday Glacier' May Be More Prone to Melting Than Expected

Antarctica’s massive Thwaites Glacier is melting more slowly than previously thought but also may be more susceptible to even small amounts of ice loss

www.scientificamerican.com

Nature:

Heterogeneous melting near the Thwaites Glacier grounding line - Nature

Thwaites Eastern Ice Shelf observations from a new underwater vehicle show that high melt rates occur where ice is sharply sloped at the ocean interface, with lower melt where the ice is comparatively flat.

www.nature.com

Reuters:

Warm water melts weak spots on Antarctica's 'Doomsday Glacier,' say scientists

Scientists studying Antarctica's vast Thwaites Glacier - nicknamed the Doomsday Glacier - say warm water is seeping into its weak spots, worsening melting caused by rising temperatures, two papers published in Nature journal showed on Wednesday.

www.reuters.com

If you think all these are propaganda please list a scientific source you actually trust.

Highlights? Mad Magazine? Stormfront?

 

[Frankfooter]

Highlights? Mad Magazine? Stormfront?

Larue always runs away at this point.

 

[JohnLarue]

Larue always runs away at this point.

No
I just ignore you for a while
keeping the exposure to a minimum , just in case whatever is wrong with you might be contagious

 

[Frankfooter]

No
I just ignore you for a while
keeping the exposure to a minimum , just in case whatever is wrong with you might be contagious

You run away as you can't actually argue the science.
All you can do is post the same old charts while ignoring the news.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1766569811285299541

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1766661376238612830

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1766647973419868552

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1766626528316780989

 

[JohnLarue]

JOHN CLAUSER, 2022 PHYSICS NOBEL PRIZE WINNER:

"I can very confidently assert, there is NO climate emergency."
“As much as it may upset many people, my message is the planet is NOT in peril. … atmospheric CO2 and methane have negligible effect on the climate.

The policies government have been implementing are total unnecessary and should be eliminated.
So far, [we] have totally misidentified what is the dominant process in controlling the climate, and all of the various models are based on incomplete and incorrect physics.
The dominant process, is “the cloud-sunlight-reflexivity thermostat mechanism. Clouds are all bright white, and they reflected 90% of the sunlight back into space making them the most crucial yet most overlooked aspect of the climate system. Two-thirds of the Earth are ocean. The Pacific Ocean alone is half the Earth. The average cloud cover for the Earth is 67%; about 50% over land and 75% over oceans.
I claim that the above conspicuous properties of clouds are the missing part of the puzzle.

I can very confidently assert, there is no climate emergency."

polar bear extinction
ocean acidification
coral bleaching
droughts / floods
wild fires
more / less snow
extreme weather events
global boiling
crop failure
catastrophic sea level rise

all broken hockey sticks and evil propaganda lies

the con has not worked

 

[oil&gas]

Outside of their mission of warning sheeple of the impending
climate catastrophe on the purpose of scoring political gain or
virtue signalling climate alarmists mostly don't actually live life
like there is an emergency. Carbon emission will continue rising
and alarmists will remain the happy people they are. As such
I think it is fruitless even for a scientist of such high calibre as Nobel
physicist to point out the obvious. If anything remarks
like 'there is no climate emergency' or 'we are not in a climate crisis'
would just play into the hands of climate activists or climate lunatics
like Steven Guilbeault. It only takes accusations like 'climate denial' or
'science denier' to convince climate sheeple the physicist is misguided.
The physicist would better focus on the algorithms and models employed
by climate scientists for their bogus prediction of the end of the world
as we know should carbon emission reach the point of no return within
this decade. But then climate sheeple are imbeciles who would not
likely be able to admit they've been duped.

JOHN CLAUSER, 2022 PHYSICS NOBEL PRIZE WINNER:




polar bear extinction
ocean acidification
coral bleaching
droughts / floods
wild fires
more / less snow
extreme weather events
global boiling
crop failure
catastrophic sea level rise

all broken hockey sticks and evil propaganda lies

the con has not worked

 

[Frankfooter]

JOHN CLAUSER, 2022 PHYSICS NOBEL PRIZE WINNER:




polar bear extinction
ocean acidification
coral bleaching
droughts / floods
wild fires
more / less snow
extreme weather events
global boiling
crop failure
catastrophic sea level rise

all broken hockey sticks and evil propaganda lies

the con has not worked

You're back to cut and paste spamming, larue.
This always happens when you can't debate the facts.
Every single time.

The global temp is rising just like the IPCC warned.
Coral bleaching is hitting its 5th major event in 8 years.
Polar bears are struggling.
The oceans are acidifying.
Canadian farmers are struggling with drought in the prairies and floods elsewhere.
This was the warmest winter in Toronto/Canada.

Everything on your list is happening just as the IPCC projected.

 

[JohnLarue]

As such
I think it is fruitless even for a scientist of such high calibre as Nobel
physicist to point out the obvious.

no
it should never be fruitless for speaking the truth

If anything remarks
like 'there is no climate emergency' or 'we are not in a climate crisis'
would just play into the hands of climate activists or climate lunatics
like Steven Guilbeault.

It only takes accusations like 'climate denial' or
'science denier' to convince climate sheeple the physicist is misguided.

hmm lets see

the truth as per a brilliant physicist , gets cancelled by a climate lunatic who does not / will not understand the scientific principals ?

now that is just plain wrong & in need of change

The physicist would better focus on the algorithms and models employed
by climate scientists for their bogus prediction of the end of the world
as we know should carbon emission reach the point of no return within
this decade.

more fence sitting ?
The physicist is best to speak his mind whenever he chooses i.e. free speech

But then climate sheeple are imbeciles who would not
likely be able to admit they've been duped.

its tough for anyone to admit they have been duped
particularly when it questions the trust they have placed in public institutions

however that is irrelevant in scientific discovery of the truth

 

[Frankfooter]

the truth as per a brilliant physicist , gets cancelled by a climate lunatic who does not / will not understand the scientific principals ?

You've posted the opinions of this physicist as if they were science.

If he is so brilliant, post the research papers and data backing his claims.
If he is a scientist that has seriously studied the issue that should be easy to do.

After all, the thousands of scientists you keep trying assassinate characters all post their work, data and papers publicly so you can check them.
Where is the science?

 

[JohnLarue]

You've posted the opinions of this physicist as if they were science.

If he is so brilliant, post the research papers and data backing his claims.
If he is a scientist that has seriously studied the issue that should be easy to do.

After all, the thousands of scientists you keep trying assassinate characters all post their work, data and papers publicly so you can check them.
Where is the science?

ha ha

the better question is where is the " cloud-sunlight-reflexivity thermostat mechanism" in the propaganda you flaunt as 'science'
science propaganda which is based on flawed computer models

cloud formation is currently impossible to model correctly...... so they just ignore it.

Where is the science?

If he is so brilliant

btw he won a noble prise in physics
his brilliance has been confirmed

did you pass even one high school level physics class before you dropped out of school ?
Apparently not

 

[JohnLarue]

JOHN CLAUSER, 2022 PHYSICS NOBEL PRIZE WINNER:

"I can very confidently assert, there is NO climate emergency."
“As much as it may upset many people, my message is the planet is NOT in peril. … atmospheric CO2 and methane have negligible effect on the climate.

The policies government have been implementing are total unnecessary and should be eliminated.
So far, [we] have totally misidentified what is the dominant process in controlling the climate, and all of the various models are based on incomplete and incorrect physics.
The dominant process, is “the cloud-sunlight-reflexivity thermostat mechanism. Clouds are all bright white, and they reflected 90% of the sunlight back into space making them the most crucial yet most overlooked aspect of the climate system. Two-thirds of the Earth are ocean. The Pacific Ocean alone is half the Earth. The average cloud cover for the Earth is 67%; about 50% over land and 75% over oceans.
I claim that the above conspicuous properties of clouds are the missing part of the puzzle.

I can very confidently assert, there is no climate emergency."

polar bear extinction
ocean acidification
coral bleaching
droughts / floods
wild fires
more / less snow
extreme weather events
global boiling
crop failure
catastrophic sea level rise

all broken hockey sticks and evil propaganda lies

the con has not worked

 

[Frankfooter]

ha ha

the better question is where is the " cloud-sunlight-reflexivity thermostat mechanism" in the propaganda you flaunt as 'science'
science propaganda which is based on flawed computer models

cloud formation is currently impossible to model correctly...... so they just ignore it.

Where is the science?


btw he won a noble prise in physics
his brilliance has been confirmed

did you pass even one high school level physics class before you dropped out of school ?
Apparently not

The IPCC has been correctly projecting the global temperature and climate for decades and their work keeps getting more accurate.
They won a Nobel.

So why do you ignore their work in the field and only listen to the opinion, and not scientific work, of this one physicist instead?
Why do use character assassinations on 99.9% of scientists then say its wrong to do so on the single, non climatologist you like?

Why do you ignore the physical proof of the models by NASA?
Why can't Clauser make a single accurate projection of the climate?

And here is a post rebutting Clauser's claims about clouds.

 

[Frankfooter]

JOHN CLAUSER, 2022 PHYSICS NOBEL PRIZE WINNER:

Clauser is also a paid lobbyist, he's on the board of the CO2 Coalition.

About - CO2 Coalition

co2coalition.org

 

[JohnLarue]

You're back to cut and paste spamming, larue.
This always happens when you can't debate the facts.
Every single time.

The global temp is rising just like the IPCC warned.
Coral bleaching is hitting its 5th major event in 8 years.
Polar bears are struggling.
The oceans are acidifying.
Canadian farmers are struggling with drought in the prairies and floods elsewhere.
This was the warmest winter in Toronto/Canada.

Everything on your list is happening just as the IPCC projected.

oh
the climate clown doubles down
on failed propaganda once again

you have proven yourself to be completely untrustworthy

 

[Frankfooter]

oh
the climate clown doubles down
on failed propaganda once again

you have proven yourself to be completely untrustworthy

You've lost the argument, larue.
All you've got are insults and one oil lobbyist.

 

[roddermac]

You've lost the argument, larue.
All you've got are insults and one oil lobbyist.

Why are you so afraid of climate change?

 

[y2kmark]

Why are you so afraid of climate change?

Food and water supply mostly, why do you ask?