Circumcision

Smallcock

Active member
Jun 5, 2009
13,647
21
38
80% of North American males have been circumcised. I don't see mass protests out there and class action suits.

The issue is raised by social justice warriors who have too much time on their hands, especially by persons who don't even have a penis to begin with.
According to the film, 250k men who are circumcised are trying to restore it. Quite a large number considering how obscure or non-advertised the treatment is. They explain in the film why there are so few lawsuits - parents sign the consent form and decades later the infant who is now a man has no legal recourse (e.g. there are cases where the surgery is botched and the entire penis is completely cut off and doctors can simply throw up there arms and say, "that was the risk, sorry"). They interview one man who was cut but his mom was under sedation when she signed so he was able to win a $4.6 million suit. If lawsuits like this were practical and enforceable for most cut guys, I think that widespread circumcision would come to an abrupt end.

It's not something that is talked about often and when it is, it can be uncomfortable or embarrassing. It's a very private and personal matter that impacts only the individual (compared to something like abortion which involves man, woman, child). It is also wrapped up in tradition, religion, and cultural norms, and for all these reason you don't get mass protests. But its days are certainly numbered among non-religious people.

On another note, unless you're lactose intolerant, who doesn't like cheese?
 

Smallcock

Active member
Jun 5, 2009
13,647
21
38
The film reveals how little most people (including myself) even know about male genitalia. For example, a portion of the foreskin remains completely attached to the base of the head throughout childhood (many if not most uncut men have the membrane that fuses the two ripped apart for cleaning as children because parents don't know better). I can attest to not knowing this as a child and recall the time as a young adolescent washing my cock and retracting the skin and was surprised and scared when it retracted much more than it ever had before, for no apparent reason. This was pre-internet so I couldn't just google the answers. I didn't know how far back the skin was going to go or if it was normal, and didn't have the nerve to ask anyone. But once fully retracted I could see and understand the mechanics of it and then wondered why it hadn't fully retracted from day one, not knowing that this is how a natural penis develops. Virtually all cut man wouldn't have the faintest clue about this, and most uncut men likely don't either.

While stroking my cock after watching the film I realized that it is true that most of the sensation actually doesn't come from the head at all and instead comes from the fingers gliding against the frenulum and gives the illusion that the head is the sensitive part. So without the frenulum and accompanying foreskin, there is just no way that the sensation could be comparable. I just always assumed I got sensation via the head, which is fascinating. Now I see how you can be completely intimate with your own body for years... decades... without even understanding it in the same way that many women seem to not understand their own pussy functionality.

The ignorance around cock and cock development is actually astonishing, at least in North America.
 

|2 /-\ | /|/

Well-known member
Mar 5, 2015
6,489
1,152
113
0
Why do you find that so hard to believe Ive had a few ladies in the business tell me they prefer guys who are cut.
For the same reason the girls I see tell me they prefer uncut and say my cock just feels right inside them

:rofl:
 

Jasmine Raine

Well-known member
Jul 28, 2014
4,008
51
48
I have to admit, reading guys going back and forth fighting over what you all think women want or like, is funny AF. claiming jealously over the other, hahahahha. Too fucking funny.

I can't believe that uncut or cut, you have guys being jealous of the other in this regard. Size, shape, etc -yay but I can't see a cut guy truly being jealous of an uncut guy - wishing he had his foreskin back.

My son is circumcised. I was 18 when I had him. I had never seen an uncut man by that age. I truly believe all men were cut and that was normal. When my mother said I needed to get my son done, I just went along with it. It would be different now. I've grown and agree that no one has the right to make that type of choice for another human. Thankfully my son his happy with the result and doesn't hate me for doing it.

He was 2 weeks old when we had it done. He was on my breast right before. My partner took him in the room. 5 mins later my son started crying and within a minute he was back on my breast and not aware, to my knowledge, of what just happened to him. It was literally in and out and done. He cried for less then 2 mins. I think it was more traumatic for me.

As for what women prefer - clean. We prefer a clean cock, and I mean really clean. Some guys think they are clean and they are not.

My only issue with an uncut guy is some can pull the foreskin back and some can't. It seems quite a few men don't know how to take care of their own cock. This is not a jab against men. plenty of women know nothing of their vaginas either. It would be easier for me personally if all foreskin worked the same way but that would be my only very minor complaint in dealing with cut vrs uncut.
 

black booty lover

Well-known member
Oct 21, 2007
9,775
1,757
113
I have to admit, reading guys going back and forth fighting over what you all think women want or like, is funny AF. claiming jealously over the other, hahahahha. Too fucking funny.

I can't believe that uncut or cut, you have guys being jealous of the other in this regard. Size, shape, etc -yay but I can't see a cut guy truly being jealous of an uncut guy - wishing he had his foreskin back.





As for what women prefer - clean. We prefer a clean cock, and I mean really clean. Some guys think they are clean and they are not.

.

Just an FYI, if you read most of the post, the uncut guys engage in mature conversation about it, while the cut guys (excluding me) come across as extremely immature with ridiculous comments that must come from extremely insecure place. My guess is because majority of the world aren't cut, there's a need to defend themselves.
 

likwid

Member
Nov 23, 2011
292
10
18
For a group of pleasure seeking men, it’s important to note that the head is desensitized when you are cut. It is highly uncomfortable walking with your foreskin retracted. All you need to do is clean properly.
 

danmand

Well-known member
Nov 28, 2003
46,971
5,606
113
The real issue is not one of pleasure or fast ejaculation.

It is unbelievable at this age, that mutilation of the bodies of infant boys is allowed.

We do not allow children to be tattooed.

Why in the bloody world can circumcision not be done at 18 years of age, when the person can make an informed decision about the procedure.
 

wilbur

Active member
Jan 19, 2004
2,077
0
36
From a cut guy's perspective, the uncut guys are just too damn sensitive.
Right On!

But I don't care whether my parents were cruel to me, or if I miss the sensitivity. I'm perfectly fine the way I am. And I'm sure that most cut men are perfectly fine the way they are too.

BTW, I did hear comments from SP's about the occasionally disgusting cheese smell, and the fact that they had to carry on because they got paid for it, the same as any other unpleasant job, like gutting fish in a fish plant, to driving the honey wagon, to wiping people's orifices as a personal care worker.
 

wilbur

Active member
Jan 19, 2004
2,077
0
36
small amount, yet there is still that chance

"Bollinger estimated that approximately 119 infant boys die from circumcision-related each year in the U.S."

http://www.cirp.org/library/death/

That article is a load of conflationary garbage. To say that it puts the life of babies in danger because so and so died of an infection in 1853. Or because african tribes do it to teenagers in the jungle. Or because up until 100 years ago, jews had it done in less than sterilec conditions. Half of the examples are from South Africa, where it's done in questionable hygenic conditions as part of coming to adulthood ceremonies.

They do point out:

"It is not known how much of this increased mortality [of boys versus girls] is due to the practice of male circumcision."
 

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
33,651
3,700
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
Swaziland: HIV infection higher among circumcised men – Survey

The Times SUNDAY can today reveal that government has known this for close to three years.

It is contained in the Swaziland Demographic and Health Survey (SDHS) of 2007 which still prevails.

This report summarises findings of the 2006 survey carried out by the Swaziland Central Statistical Office (SCO).

The report places the infection rate for circumcised males at 22 per cent while for those uncircumcised stands at 20 per cent.

http://www.times.co.sz/news/19604-more-circumcised-men-are-hiv-positive.html
 

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
33,651
3,700
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
The United States, a nation with 4.5% of the world's population, consumes 47% of the world's Viagra (Pfizer's own figures). Turns out the same nation has been circumcising the majority of its male infants for generations.

A new study in the International Journal of Men’s Health shows that circumcised men have a 4.5 times greater chance of suffering from erectile dysfunction (ED) than intact men, revealing what appears to be a significant acquisition vector. Other studies have previously observed that circumcision’s damage results in worsened erectile functioning, inability to maintain an erection, and reducing the glans sensitivity, including an overall penis sensitivity reduction by 75%. A recent study discovered that premature ejaculation is five times more likely when adjusted for erectile dysfunction and circumcision.

Moreover, in Israel- a country that routinely circumcises their baby boys for religious reasons- Viagra is so common there that the Pfizer pharmaceutical company asked for permission to market Viagra without a doctor's prescription- making it an over-the-counter medication.


http://www.thewholenetwork.org/twn-news/does-circumcision-cause-erectile-dysfunction



 

Robert Mugabe

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2017
11,055
8,337
113
The United States, a nation with 4.5% of the world's population, consumes 47% of the world's Viagra (Pfizer's own figures). Turns out the same nation has been circumcising the majority of its male infants for generations.

A new study in the International Journal of Men’s Health shows that circumcised men have a 4.5 times greater chance of suffering from erectile dysfunction (ED) than intact men, revealing what appears to be a significant acquisition vector. Other studies have previously observed that circumcision’s damage results in worsened erectile functioning, inability to maintain an erection, and reducing the glans sensitivity, including an overall penis sensitivity reduction by 75%. A recent study discovered that premature ejaculation is five times more likely when adjusted for erectile dysfunction and circumcision.

Moreover, in Israel- a country that routinely circumcises their baby boys for religious reasons- Viagra is so common there that the Pfizer pharmaceutical company asked for permission to market Viagra without a doctor's prescription- making it an over-the-counter medication.


http://www.thewholenetwork.org/twn-news/does-circumcision-cause-erectile-dysfunction



Now, that makes it interesting.But, if you notice, on the graph. In every instance the cut men score bigger. Seriously, that is an interesting. we should have a poll of members, here. no pun intended.
 

black booty lover

Well-known member
Oct 21, 2007
9,775
1,757
113
BTW, I did hear comments from SP's about the occasionally disgusting cheese smell, and the fact that they had to carry on because they got paid for it, the same as any other unpleasant job, like gutting fish in a fish plant, to driving the honey wagon, to wiping people's orifices as a personal care worker.
Sure they told you that.....:rolleyes:
 

james t kirk

Well-known member
Aug 17, 2001
24,059
4,064
113
I'm cut and I could not be happier. I suffer no trauma, no bad memories (as if), or any negative effect whatsoever. I had both my sons done, and they've never complained about it to me. I didn't think twice about it.

It seems to me that uncircumcised men are always pushing the agenda on not to circumcise. They must have some sort of complex about it. With circumcised men, the most you'll ever hear from them is "go away, let me make my own decision with respect to my family". With uncircumcised men, they are obsessive about it. Forcing their outlook on it on others. (Like Canadaman for example, who is like a broken record on the issue already just posting nonstop complete bullshit. (Which I don't even bother to read either.))

If you don't want to circumcise your kid, then don't do it. It's really that simple. If you're cut and you feel that it's preferable way of life and you want to have your kid the same way, then go ahead and do it.
 

danmand

Well-known member
Nov 28, 2003
46,971
5,606
113
I'm cut and I could not be happier. I suffer no trauma, no bad memories (as if), or any negative effect whatsoever. I had both my sons done, and they've never complained about it to me. I didn't think twice about it.

It seems to me that uncircumcised men are always pushing the agenda on not to circumcise. They must have some sort of complex about it. With circumcised men, the most you'll ever hear from them is "go away, let me make my own decision with respect to my family". With uncircumcised men, they are obsessive about it. Forcing their outlook on it on others. (Like Canadaman for example, who is like a broken record on the issue already just posting nonstop complete bullshit. (Which I don't even bother to read either.))

If you don't want to circumcise your kid, then don't do it. It's really that simple. If you're cut and you feel that it's preferable way of life and you want to have your kid the same way, then go ahead and do it.
I don't think any of us could care less if you are happy or unhappy about your circumcision.

The issue is of allowing mutilation of the bodies of infant boys. We do not allow children to be tattooed.

Why in the bloody world can circumcision not be done at 18 years of age, when the person can make an informed decision about the procedure.
 

Smallcock

Active member
Jun 5, 2009
13,647
21
38
I'm cut and I could not be happier. I suffer no trauma, no bad memories (as if), or any negative effect whatsoever. I had both my sons done, and they've never complained about it to me. I didn't think twice about it.

If you don't want to circumcise your kid, then don't do it. It's really that simple. If you're cut and you feel that it's preferable way of life and you want to have your kid the same way, then go ahead and do it.
The people complaining are those that are cut and wish they hadn't been, and their argument is valid - aside from medical necessity, one should leave the decision to get cut to the individual. You are happy and didn't think twice about it because you have no way of knowing what you lost. Fortunately, getting cut doesn't seem to have any negative effect on most people.
 
Toronto Escorts