At most I could see Iran giving Hezbollah orders to launch rockets from Lebanon.
Attack on Syria is it justified ?
- Thread starter Mr Deeds
- Start date
Considering the head of Iran's Revolutionary Guard has stated explicitly that they will destroy Israel if there is any attack on Syria...And Iran what? Iran hasn't initiated any wars with anyone for the past ~200 years but I guess if all your "news" is from the BBC and CNN then I would understand why one would think Iran would launch military strikes....
http://www.timesofisrael.com/iran-r...f-israel-will-be-destroyed-if-syria-attacked/
Quite the imagination.A planned attack on Syria by America if Assad used chemical weapons on his people was scripted long ago. Evidence of chemical weapons being used will be brought forth to justify the attack. Then in the future, the president will have to apologize to the American people for involving America in the Syrian conflict by purporting to have received incorrect information that chemical weapons were used when in fact they were not. This play was written by the same authors of Bush's weapons of mass destruction. Assad will meet the same fate as Saddam Hussein and Gaddafi. China and Russian will lose billions in the loss of their investments in Syria as they did in Iraq and Iran. The new regime will be at first anti-Iranian, and pro-America, but will gradual shift back to being under Iranian influence as Iran goes nuclear within 6 months from now. A nuclear Iran will develop a strange less hostile relationship with Israel, independent of America, and Iran will reduce their support of terrorist groups.
You might be right, but unfortunately, our short sighted politicians only see what is infront of their nose.Attacking Syria is NOT justified because honestly that civil war is none of our business. You know what should and be our business?????
That damn Fukushima catastrophe. If U.S. should be thinking about attacking and occupying is Japan. That nuclear mess will have more damage to not only the U.S. but the whole world many times over in years to come.
John Kerry was just asked on CNN whether the positive test for Sarin came from the UN.
His answer: no, it was from an independent source (which he didnt mention).
Oh wow, its George Bush dejavu all over again
His answer: no, it was from an independent source (which he didnt mention).
Oh wow, its George Bush dejavu all over again
Of course the other side of the question is if the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, Stockpiling and Use of Chemical Weapons isn't worth the paper it was written on. . . .Attacking Syria is NOT justified because honestly that civil war is none of our business.
OK and sometimes the U.S., Canada, France, the U.K. etc. . . get it wrong.John Kerry was just asked on CNN whether the positive test for Sarin came from the UN.
His answer: no, it was from an independent source (which he didnt mention).
Oh wow, its George Bush dejavu all over again
I agree with the British Prime Minister that the Well has been well and truly poisoned, but does that mean knee jerk reactions are now the order of the day?
What do you mean?? Knee jerk reactions by whom??I agree with the British Prime Minister that the Well has been well and truly poisoned, but does that mean knee jerk reactions are now the order of the day?
Did you wake up from your dream yet?:Eek:A planned attack on Syria by America if Assad used chemical weapons on his people was scripted long ago. Evidence of chemical weapons being used will be brought forth to justify the attack. Then in the future, the president will have to apologize to the American people for involving America in the Syrian conflict by purporting to have received incorrect information that chemical weapons were used when in fact they were not. This play was written by the same authors of Bush's weapons of mass destruction. Assad will meet the same fate as Saddam Hussein and Gaddafi. China and Russian will lose billions in the loss of their investments in Syria as they did in Iraq and Iran. The new regime will be at first anti-Iranian, and pro-America, but will gradual shift back to being under Iranian influence as Iran goes nuclear within 6 months from now. A nuclear Iran will develop a strange less hostile relationship with Israel, independent of America, and Iran will reduce their support of terrorist groups.
What do you mean?? Knee jerk reactions by whom??
Enough said?Oh wow, its George Bush dejavu all over again
And I can't stand either The President or the Secretary of State - but I can see the truth.
Rules are for the "White Man" only.Of course the other side of the question is if the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, Stockpiling and Use of Chemical Weapons isn't worth the paper it was written on. . . .
And whats the truth??And I can't stand either The President or the Secretary of State - but I can see the truth
That a nerve gas was used, and that all the missiles came from areas controlled by the Syrian Army, and they all landed in areas controlled by the rebels.And whats the truth??
So you want more innocent people to die? The US military murdered well over a million people in Iraq looking for WMDs that didn't exist. Until real hard reliable evidence is presented, no attack is justified.Yes the US is justified in attacking Syria and hitting Assad with everything they've got. He's a murderer and a thug who has used chemical weapons against his own people. The only question is will they hit him hard enough, or at all? Unfortunately most of the US "allies" are backing out, while Russia and China, for their own shelfish reasons, are backing Asad to the hilt. So, hit him and hit him hard. Give him a lesson he won't forget. But will they?
In my view, the World is better place since the U.S. military went in to Iraq and killed Uday and Qusay Hussein and evenually, arrranging the death of their father, Saddam Hussein. Who really knows what's best for the region.........? Bashar al-Assad and his people in Syria are said to be mocking President Obama for talking loud and then lacking conviction and courage while the Arab League has now said that they agree some type of military response is appropriate for Assad's army gassing women and children to death. News oulets are saying that there are two U.S. warships 'in the area' equipped with 80 or so 'cruise' type missles on hand and at the ready...... Sincerely, Jon .So you want more innocent people to die? The US military murdered well over a million people in Iraq looking for WMDs that didn't exist. Until real hard reliable evidence is presented, no attack is justified.
Actually the UN sent in a team to inspect people directly. There is no doubt that chemical weapons were used.What I find mildly ironic is all the usual Lefties were riding Bushes balls for no WMD's in Iraq, and now we supposedly have Assad gassing his own people and they have no problem accepting the thin evidence thats out there.
Only evidence is a few pics of victims with stuff on their face. Could be toothpaste for all we know
What they're is doubt about is by who, and what to do about it.
It could have been Assad's orders. He could be losing control of the military and it could be some rogue commander. It could have been the terrorists who are infiltrating the rebels. It could have been Hezbollah.
Hard to know what to do about that.
I think the UN needs to organize a stabilization force and, post war, conduct war crimes tribunals to get to the bottom of it.
I don't think anybody misses those guys, but was it really worth a million lives or whatever enormous number all aspects of the conflict wound up claiming?In my view, the World is better place since the U.S. military went in to Iraq and killed Uday and Qusay Hussein and evenually, arrranging the death of their father, Saddam Hussein.
It is the cost of that benefit that troubles most people.
If that independent test was from MSF or one of the other aid groups on scene would that make it acceptable?John Kerry was just asked on CNN whether the positive test for Sarin came from the UN.
His answer: no, it was from an independent source (which he didnt mention).
Oh wow, its George Bush dejavu all over again
Trying to justify the buildup on Lebanon's border?It could have been the terrorists who are infiltrating the rebels. It could have been Hezbollah.
.
More nonsense.
http://www.timesofisrael.com/idf-soldiers-amass-on-lebanese-border/
Fool me once, shame on... shame on you. Fool me — you can't get fooled again.OK and sometimes the U.S., Canada, France, the U.K. etc. . . get it wrong.
I agree with the British Prime Minister that the Well has been well and truly poisoned, but does that mean knee jerk reactions are now the order of the day?
