How cultish of you.how completely illogical and petty of you
81.8%, 75% or even 60% it will not matter, Pierre P will get elected and become sitting member of parliament
therefore it is irrelevant
How cultish of you.how completely illogical and petty of you
81.8%, 75% or even 60% it will not matter, Pierre P will get elected and become sitting member of parliament
therefore it is irrelevant
Minoritie govts will be more the norm going forward. The NDP will support Carney for quiet a while. Unless there is a scandal, there would be a high price to defeating the Libs.you are delusional
this was a two way horse race won by a neck & your horse would had lost had it not been for Trump
The conservatives had more people vote for them than in any election since the 1980s
and they pickup seat in Ont , BC
Poiliervre has the support of his party
you should far more concerned about Carney delivering an end to the US tariffs and uniting what has become an even more divided country
the top 2 responsibilities of the Prime Minister as per Jean Chrétien
Minority governments rarely go the distant
- Hold the country together
- Maintain the economic relationship with the US
You have not seen the last of Pierre Poiliervre
Carney is greasing the rails for Poilievre to get elected to the House of Commons because he knows that if he got in the way, Poilievre would become the leader of the Bloc Alberskatchewan instead, and would be much more difficult to contend with.It's the right move...Shows that he has nothing to fear from Pierre.
In his own special little election, in the safest riding in Canada, at a cost of $1,000,000 or more.how completely illogical and petty of you
81.8%, 75% or even 60% it will not matter, Pierre P will get elected and become sitting member of parliament
therefore it is irrelevant
"His riding" no longer exists.Did he congratulate the man who unseated him in his riding???
Listen up, I am here to supply the information.
ps....if you had read one of my previous posts, I wrote Pee Pee was gracious during the debates, especially at the end and conceded graciously to Carney. I further added if he acted this way throughout his campaign, he may have been PM today. If he had not gone to the CONVOY twats with coffee, donuts and fist bumps he may have kept his seat today.
How cultish of you.
At least not for Pee Pee it doesnt. The folks in the riding trounced him on his ass."His riding" no longer exists.
Which riding are you referring to? Is it that new riding of Carleton-Liberal Rig Job Annex? Ridings like this should only go up on the electoral map with a biohazard label on them!At least not for Pee Pee it doesnt. The folks in the riding trounced him on his ass.
In his own special little election, in the safest riding in Canada, at a cost of $1,000,000 or more.
What a strong, tough leader. Maybe we can get the Governor General to start cutting up his pork chops for him so he has small bites to eat.
If the Liberals and NDP really want to save the taxpayer some money they can always decline to run a candidate against him. That would be a responsible thing to do, given their tiny chances of winning the riding. I won't hold my breath to see if they are capable of such decisions.In his own special little election, in the safest riding in Canada, at a cost of $1,000,000 or more.
What a strong, tough leader. Maybe we can get the Governor General to start cutting up his pork chops for him so he has small bites to eat.
The riding that now is served by a new unknown Lib called Fanjoy.Which riding are you referring to? Is it that new riding of Carleton-Liberal Rig Job Annex? Ridings like this should only go up on the electoral map with a biohazard label on them!
I'm being irrelevant and petty by making fun of PP's loss?look, i offered up a simple factual response that your point was irrelevant
i intentionally avoided attacking you ... initially
but you seem hell bent on responding with personal insults
leave it at that and learn something
Are you the only person who doesn't know how the riding was fixed for Fanjoy? If so, you certainly don't have any knowledge to share with anyone.The riding that now is served by a new unknown Lib called Fanjoy.
Have a look! Knowledge is power Dutchie.
![]()
HAHAHAHAHA, why is it every time a Conservative loses the election was rigged? HAHAHAHA, you are hilarious. WOWAre you the only person who doesn't know how the riding was fixed for Fanjoy? If so, you certainly don't have any knowledge to share with anyone.
Ironically, you take some effort to help me make my point. It says a lot that a nobody bank-bencher-to-be, as opposed to a star Liberal candidate, could win such a riding over an incumbent of many years with broad national appeal and power within parliament. Redistricting must have made it pretty easy for Fanjoy! I can only imagine who lives in that annex to the Carleton riding - civil servants, CBC employees, recent arrivals to Canada, federal consultants and contractors?
Ah, but this is no theory. The riding was so radically redistricted that even, in your own words, a nobody Liberal could win. That's shameless rigging.HAHAHAHAHA, why is it every time a Conservative loses the election was rigged? HAHAHAHA, you are hilarious. WOW
Ah, so now it's the other parties' responsibility to bow down and let Lil Petey have his own Super Soft Election Party.If the Liberals and NDP really want to save the taxpayer some money they can always decline to run a candidate against him. That would be a responsible thing to do, given their tiny chances of winning the riding. I won't hold my breath to see if they are capable of such decisions.
Political parties never HAVE TO do the right thing for taxpayers, and they often don't. But they should be accountable for their decisions, don't you think? Which do you think is more reasonable and responsible, for the Conservatives to find a new leader, despite their leader increasing their seats and popular vote, or the the Libs/NDP standing down in a riding where they haven't a chance in hell of being competitive, in order to save taxpayers (and their own party coffers) some money?Ah, so now it's the other parties' responsibility to bow down and let Lil Petey have his own Super Soft Election Party.
The election would still need to be called, people would still need to cast ballots. And what would stop anyone from running as an independent? More "please suspend democracy until I get what I want" from Conservative Voters.
As for the redistricting:
![]()
A look at misleading claims about Poilievre's riding after his election loss
On Monday, Canadian electors granted the Liberal party its fourth consecutive mandate and a minority government.www.thecanadianpressnews.ca
Nope. The riding got more rural, which should have supported lil' petey.
So the issue is that Elections Canada needed to take special care to give PP a super soft riding, tailor made to make sure only conservative voters were there? Why doe PP deserve special treatment that no other candidate got? Is he that soft? The truth is he cooked himself when he supported the Convoy. The people of Ottawa didn't forget.Political parties never HAVE TO do the right thing for taxpayers, and they often don't. But they should be accountable for their decisions, don't you think? Which do you think is more reasonable and responsible, for the Conservatives to find a new leader, despite their leader increasing their seats and popular vote, or the the Libs/NDP standing down in a riding where they haven't a chance in hell of being competitive, in order to save taxpayers (and their own party coffers) some money?
As to your link, I've seen all these arguments. They aren't persuasive, or in many cases even on point. The riding changes were made by committees? Who was on the committees? Who appointed them? Riding changes could benefit the Conservatives overall across Canada? What has that got to do with the specific effect of changes to Carleton? They made an analysis transposing 2021 results to say Poilievre still had a fighting chance. Too bad they made the changes 2 years later and that the demographics of the annexed area were rapidly changing! Typical intellectually lazy media reporting. The plain truth is that Poilievre did not suddenly become unpopular with the voters in his former riding. He was unpopular in the annex to the riding - an analysis the article fails to undertake.
Ah, but this is no theory. The riding was so radically redistricted that even, in your own words, a nobody Liberal could win. That's shameless rigging.
A pee wee hockey convener stay-at-home dad got elected over a federal leader. No subtlety to this chicanery. No matter, Poilievre will be back, speaking daily in the House, and holding the Liberals to account in the media. Fanjoy, on the other hand, will be reading and executing his whip's marching orders without question, saying "hear, hear", and drinking coffee for a year until the next election.