Signing Wayne Simmonds to a one-year deal looks pretty good...Toronto guy, tough guy, cheap salary...
Gainey and Carbonneau are the most overrated players of all time...Without going into chapter and verse on "skills", I'll just say Hyman has a different set of skills that makes him valuable to a team. For example, Gainey and Carbonneau were not elite scorers but they are both in the HHOF.
![]()
Guy Carbonneau - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Tell that to the 1st line players that they continually shut down year after year..........Gainey and Carbonneau are the most overrated players of all time...
Well past his prime. Won’t be effective, has been too beat up over the years.Signing Wayne Simmonds to a one-year deal looks pretty good...Toronto guy, tough guy, cheap salary...
I've always like Simmonds myself.Signing Wayne Simmonds to a one-year deal looks pretty good...Toronto guy, tough guy, cheap salary...
Who would you rather have...Bob Gainey or Mike Bossy...Guy Carbonneau or Peter Stastny?Tell that to the 1st line players that they continually shut down year after year..........
In international play the Russian revered Gainey..
At 32?.........Yes he's past his prime but he should have something left in the tank for a year or two shouldn't he?Well past his prime. Won’t be effective, has been too beat up over the years.
Since this is a Leaf thread, I won't go into chapter and verse on Gainey and Carbonneau, except to say they are multiple Selke winners and played on multiple Stanley Cup winners.Tell that to the 1st line players that they continually shut down year after year..........
In international play the Russian revered Gainey..
It’s only a one-year deal and he’s there to break the Leafs pussy reputation.Well past his prime. Won’t be effective, has been too beat up over the years.
They are overrated...Gainey played on powerhouse teams that had Lafleur, Shutt, Lemaire, Robinson, Lapointe, Savard, Dryden, was a third line winger with a career high of 27 goals...Carbonneau had a career high of 24 goals, those aren’t HOF numbers.Since this is a Leaf thread, I won't go into chapter and verse on Gainey and Carbonneau, except to say they are multiple Selke winners and played on multiple Stanley Cup winners.
Of course the skill level of Bossy and Stastny overwhelm both Gainey and Carbonneau. And given the choice you would pick them.Who would you rather have...Bob Gainey or Mike Bossy...Guy Carbonneau or Peter Stastny?
I’m not saying they were shit but hall of fame is a little much, they invented an award so Gainey could win it!
in the 1976 Canada Cup the Russian coach called Gainey ‘the best technical hockey player in the world’, that team featured Clarke, Dionne, Esposito, Hull, Lafleur, Perreault, Shutt, Sittler among others...those guys are Hall of Famers.
Again, who would you rather have, Bossy or Tiger Williams?Of course the skill level of Bossy and Stastny overwhelm both Gainey and Carbonneau. And given the choice you would pick them.
But to win cups you need shut down players that can negate other teams strong points. Players that sacrifice offence for defence. Carbonneau was one of the best faceoff men in his generation. You win the faceoff and you control the play.
Never saw Bossy on the penalty kill ever, Christ he never when in the corners. Ask Dave Williams,lol. Stastny was a little more well rounded if I recall but was hardly ever asked to fulfill those duties.
I would venture to take a guess that if analytics were available in those days both Carbonneau and Gainey would chart out quite high. I know their teammates raved about their contributions to their Cup winning teams.And that's they key to winning cups. You have to have a well balanced team that can compete in all areas of the game.
I don't discount either of them as being HOFers. They helped change the game.
I don't think either belong. If Gainey has the same career on any other team no way he gets in. It's because of the team he was on. With other great players. It's kind of like the Steelers of the 70's who had multiple hall of famers because they won 4 super bowls. Don't get me wrong they were really good players just not HOF. How many HOF's were on that great Montreal team? Sorry, they all can't be HOF worthy.Without going into chapter and verse on "skills", I'll just say Hyman has a different set of skills that makes him valuable to a team. For example, Gainey and Carbonneau were not elite scorers but they are both in the HHOF.
![]()
Guy Carbonneau - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Again, who would you rather have, Bossy or Tiger Williams?
Bossy wasn’t on the penalty kill because he was always on the power play...for those Islander teams Butch Goring was on the penalty kill, he’d be a better candidate than either Gainey or Guy Carbonneau for HOF, compare their careers, why isn’t Butch Goring in the HOF?
Goring was on a Canada Cup team...Clark Gillies is another example of a iffy HOFer...Well I like Goring over Gillies in the hall if that means anything. Never scored over 23 goals in a season with the Islanders if we are going by your definition of a HOF contributor.
To the best of my recollection he was never on any international teams. Could be wrong though on that one. Going by memory.
i remember him for his work ethic, Helmut and not taking any penalties.
Goring was on a Canada Cup team...Clark Gillies is another example of a iffy HOFer...Goring had several 30 goal seasons.
If you look at the intangibles : HEART / Toughness / sacrifice - I think Hyman is a guy I would consider very skilled and absolutely want on my team. You can’t teach HEART and GRITT.Most 3rd line players don't have a lot of skill. No I don't consider Hyman a skill player. How would he do playing on the 3rd line? Would he even score 10? That's my point you don't just need skill to score. If you grind and put forth a lot of effort it can be done that way if you're put with other guys who have skill and create chances.
He has had allot of time off - so will be healthy and “LETS GET READY TO RUMBLE”! While I still love and miss Martin!Well past his prime. Won’t be effective, has been too beat up over the years.