Oh will you give that protocols shit a rest? Never read it, or whatever else you jerk off to.So you think some Americans aren't allowed to lobby their government, simply because you've read the "protocols' too many times.
But I have read this:
Oh will you give that protocols shit a rest? Never read it, or whatever else you jerk off to.So you think some Americans aren't allowed to lobby their government, simply because you've read the "protocols' too many times.
Statutory interpretation is obviously not your strong point.Population increase, decrease etc do not matter. The definition of genocide:
Genocide is an internationally recognized crime where acts are committed with the intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group. These acts fall into five categories:
Per the definition of genocide, you only need to commit 1 of the 5 crimes, with the intent to destroy, in whole or in part a national, ethnic, racial or religious group.
- Killing members of the group
- Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group
- Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part
- Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group
- Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group
Israel has time and again, both shown intent (their own politicians have) and committed atleast 3 of the 5 crimes above.
I dont have to interpret anything when genocide is happening right in front of my eyes.Statutory interpretation is obviously not your strong point.
You are misreading or misunderstanding the definition. By your own post you are showing that whatever is happening in Gaza i is not genocide.I dont have to interpret anything when genocide is happening right in front of my eyes.
There is nothing to interpret or misread in the definition. It is plain English. Israel has shown intent, and it has deliberately killed.You are misreading or misunderstanding the definition. By your own post you are showing that whatever is happening in Gaza i is not genocide.
You are wrong and as I have said attempting to have a reasonable conversation with you is an exercise in futility. Ask someone who actually know how to read a statutory definition.There is nothing to interpret or misread in the definition. It is plain English. Israel has shown intent, and it has deliberately killed.
Bickering on the definition of genocide while tens of thousands have been killed.Ask someone who actually know how to read a statutory definition.
Since you are saying that I am reading it wrong, explain what is wrong with what I said. The definition is quite clear and that is why even the ICJ has ruled that Israel needs to stop incitement and prevent genocide.You are wrong and as I have said attempting to have a reasonable conversation with you is an exercise in futility. Ask someone who actually know how to read a statutory definition.
So you're saying that Oct.7 was genocide.Genocide does not have to result in population decline. It is about causing deaths, with the intent to cause deaths - to put it simply. So you could kill only 2 or 3 people - but if the intent of killing the 2 or 3 people was to exterminate an ethnicity or even ethnically cleanse them from the region, it is genocide. That is per the genocide conventions definition of genocide.
Once again, you love to discard as irrelevant, facts that do not fit your narrative.Population increase, decrease etc do not matter.
No. It was a terrorist attack. The intent was not to destroy Jews, it was to retaliate for the Al-Aqsa storming. Israel response however is genocide.So you're saying that Oct.7 was genocide.
What is irrelevant will always be irrelevant regardless of how hard you try to deflect and distract to push your own narratives.Once again, you love to discard as irrelevant, facts that do not fit your narrative.
You are the one that keeps calling all the news and human rights reports 'fake news'.Once again, you love to discard as irrelevant, facts that do not fit your narrative.
Genocide is no based upon the number of deaths, however tragic and yes the situation is Gaza is tragic. Were WWI or WWI or Viet Mam etc genocides? Everyone should lament the human tragedy is Gaza but that is very different than referring to it as genocide which has nothing to do with the tragedy and everything to do with demonizing Israel.Bickering on the definition of genocide while tens of thousands have been killed.
How about math: How many people have to die before it's considered genocide?
What percentage of the population has to die before it's considered genocide?
If I thought there was any point in attempting to reason with you i would. you are blinded by your jew hatred and your myopic interest in demonizing Israel. I would much rather engage with a poster who has an interest in reason.Since you are saying that I am reading it wrong, explain what is wrong with what I said. The definition is quite clear and that is why even the ICJ has ruled that Israel needs to stop incitement and prevent genocide.
Good. So you'd agree with my statement that population increase or decrease does not matter when calling something genocide.Genocide is no based upon the number of deaths, however tragic and yes the situation is Gaza is tragic. Were WWI or WWI or Viet Mam etc genocides? Everyone should lament the human tragedy is Gaza but that is very different than referring to it as genocide which has nothing to do with the tragedy and everything to do with demonizing Israel.
So as I thought, no actual response.If I thought there was any point in attempting to reason with you i would. you are blinded by your jew hatred and your myopic interest in demonizing Israel. I would much rather engage with a poster who has an interest in reason.
Criticism of zionism and Israeli genocide is not antisemitic.you are blinded by your jew hatred
Not much different.Oh will you give that protocols shit a rest? Never read it, or whatever else you jerk off to.
But I have read this:
So the Ottomans ruling over other people's is fine with you but Brits doing the same thing is evil. That's reasonable.BS. The Brits WERE colonial invaders, who invaded Ottoman lands, took over the lands, paper partitioned it with France. So yes, they were colonial invaders....