Asian Sexy Babe
Ashley Madison

Wait, they were only supposed to cut the commie socialist handouts for other people, not my handouts!

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
18,010
3,577
113
Lol. You didn’t even watch the video you quoted. Then went on about some nonsense and posted some BS charts. So, since your comments have nothing to do with the video you quoted, you should follow your own advice, LaStooge.
i made no mention of the video, so no I did not quote it


bs charts you say
which just highlights a key point
you do not understand the mathematics of the US debt bomb or worse you just do not care

my advise
try facts & logic on the relevant subject matter.

I provided facts and logic which are certainly relevant to
wait-they-were-only-supposed-to-cut-the-commie-socialist-handouts-for-other-people-not-my-handouts.

unlike your strange divergence into hooker review counts and posting in other sections of this board in order to 'keep up with the Jones" or 'be politically correct', neither of which has any value.

no since you are obviously extremely confused i will spell it out for you: there should be zero govt handouts
 

versitile1

Well-known member
Jan 15, 2013
3,409
1,461
113
i made no mention of the video, so no I did not quote it


bs charts you say
which just highlights a key point
you do not understand the mathematics of the US debt bomb or worse you just do not care

my advise
try facts & logic on the relevant subject matter.

I provided facts and logic which are certainly relevant to



unlike your strange divergence into hooker review counts and posting in other sections of this board in order to 'keep up with the Jones" or 'be politically correct', neither of which has any value.

no since you are obviously extremely confused i will spell it out for you: there should be zero govt handouts
You proved you were stupid and lazy by quoting my post and not watching the video in my post. You truly are a LaStooge.
 
  • Like
Reactions: shakenbake

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
18,010
3,577
113
You proved you were stupid and lazy by quoting my post and not watching the video in my post. You truly are a LaStooge.
you seem quite confused by this, so let me, once again, clarify for you
i made no mention of the video, so no I did not quote it

how old are you ? 14?
 

southpaw

Well-known member
May 21, 2002
664
656
113
Neither does the US. USAID is part of international relations and is part of the US ability to influence international policy.
If that's true, why would they cut it?
 

SchlongConery

License to Shill
Jan 28, 2013
13,312
7,066
113
there is nothing respectful in that statement
It's more respectful of the forum than calling you a dumb, selfish ignorant fuck.



government is not a charity
Not technically, but it is an even more important foundation of providing social services like medicare, unemployment insurance, disability pensions and a whole host of other programs that support the disabled and otherwise less fortunate/



unless you have not been paying attention 1/2 of Canadian families are $200 from not covering the monthly bills
As much as most would like to support charities , one must look after their family firstt
I'm not talking about those families barely being able to cover their bills, living month to month contributing to charities. Although it has been my expereince that the less fortunate, and poor, are far more generous with sharing what they have with the even less fortunate than ignorant, selfish small dicked, big mouthed cocksuckers driving around in bug crew cab diesel duallys and other vulgar pickup trucks with FUCK TRUDEAU flags as their grocery getter. The same dicks who do indeed fail to provide child support, least of all help out the less fortunate.

So, Mister $300/HR HOOKER CLIENT...spare me the poor folk straw man. Anyone can tell from your posts that you can well afford to share with the less fortunate.



How far people go in their virtue signalling is self-determined
I don;t brag, nor complain about the many levels and amount of taxes I spend. I make good money and live a good life. I don;t waste money on the latest car or a McMansion anymore. But I still probably make more contributions to organizations than you do as a percentage of my income than you do... which is probably ZERO in your case.

I do it because I have empathy for those less fortunate, intelligent, have fewer opportunities or are just down on their luck.
 
  • Like
Reactions: shakenbake

SchlongConery

License to Shill
Jan 28, 2013
13,312
7,066
113
Respectfully, I'll say that the difference between domestic and foreign aid is too complex for your mind to understand
It's not at all. If you have ever travelled to second or third world countries, you can;t help but feel the human need to help out people. Unless you are an exploitve, selfish cheapskate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: shakenbake

SchlongConery

License to Shill
Jan 28, 2013
13,312
7,066
113
no since you are obviously extremely confused i will spell it out for you: there should be zero govt handouts
Well considering you probably consume more dollars of health care than you pay in taxes, pay less gas tax on roads you drive on to to cover the actual cost, you are a recipeint of government handouts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: shakenbake

versitile1

Well-known member
Jan 15, 2013
3,409
1,461
113
  • Like
Reactions: shakenbake

versitile1

Well-known member
Jan 15, 2013
3,409
1,461
113
you seem quite confused by this, so let me, once again, clarify for you
i made no mention of the video, so no I did not quote it

how old are you ? 14?
No, are you obsessed with 14 year olds, because it’s clear you don’t hobby, you know, the whole purpose of this forum?

You seem to have a hard time understanding something so simple but that should be expected from LaStooge. You quoted my post #13 and replied in post #14 in this thread, which contained a video that you didn’t watch. Stupid and lazy. Fits LaStooge to a tee.

 

southpaw

Well-known member
May 21, 2002
664
656
113
It's not at all. If you have ever travelled to second or third world countries, you can;t help but feel the human need to help out people. Unless you are an exploitve, selfish cheapskate.
You're moving goal posts. I said no foreign aid. You said I was implying no domestic aid, which I was not.

Of course we should help our fellow citizens during an emergency. That's why we live in the same country, and pay taxes to the same government.

But there is no obligation to do so for foreign countries. If you want to, by all means, donate your own money. Don't expect your fellow taxpayers to.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JohnLarue

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
18,010
3,577
113
It's more respectful of the forum than calling you a dumb, selfish ignorant fuck.
wow
somebody hit a nerve



Not technically, but it is an even more important foundation of providing social services like medicare, unemployment insurance, disability pensions and a whole host of other programs that support the disabled and otherwise less fortunate/
And what happens to medicare, unemployment insurance, disability pensions and a whole host of other programs that support the disabled and otherwise less fortunate when the US govt become insolvent ?



I'm not talking about those families barely being able to cover their bills, living month to month contributing to charities.
how do you know anyone's specific family financial obligations / financial capabilities ?
i know of several friends who make what most consider very good income , but after taxes, ex-wife deductions, kids tuition they are racking up huge debt
borrowing more to donate to charity is not just not an option


Although it has been my expereince that the less fortunate, and poor, are far more generous with sharing what they have with the even less fortunate than ignorant, selfish small dicked, big mouthed cocksuckers driving around in bug crew cab diesel duallys and other vulgar pickup trucks with FUCK TRUDEAU flags as their grocery getter. The same dicks who do indeed fail to provide child support, least of all help out the less fortunate.
What is wrong with you ? you cannot equate political leanings to vehicle choice / delinquent child support / charitable giving

So, Mister $300/HR HOOKER CLIENT...spare me the poor folk straw man. Anyone can tell from your posts that you can well afford to share with the less fortunate.
but nobody can tell from my post how much I share with with the less fortunate.
that is my business and I choose to keep that a private matter



I don;t brag, nor complain about the many levels and amount of taxes I spend. I make good money and live a good life. I don;t waste money on the latest car or a McMansion anymore.
that is your business and your choice what you spend you money on and your choice how much you choose to divulge publicly

But I still probably make more contributions to organizations than you do as a percentage of my income than you do
maybe yes, maybe no
you will never know as that is my business and I choose to keep that a private matter

you do have a leg up on me in the self righteous virtual signalling prick category


... which is probably ZERO in your case.
wrong

lets see how much the liberals have stolen from the tax payer in the STDC scandal before any public lynching's take place


I do it because I have empathy for those less fortunate, intelligent, have fewer opportunities or are just down on their luck.
do not pretend you have a monopoly on empathy

1/2 of Canadian families are $200 away from not covering their bills and there biggest non -mortgagee expense is tax
Canadians are taxed way too much
if govt did not squeeze the public so much, charitable giving would increase
 
Last edited:

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
18,010
3,577
113
No, are you obsessed with 14 year olds, because it’s clear you don’t hobby, you know, the whole purpose of this forum?
you are incredibly stupid and apparently perverted enough to envision sex with a minor
do you really want to go down that road ?

now pay attention
My interactions with the ladies is (again), none of your concern

besides I thought we agreed to keep your mother / sister out of this


You seem to have a hard time understanding something so simple but that should be expected from LaStooge. You quoted my post #13 and replied in post #14 in this thread, which contained a video that you didn’t watch. Stupid and lazy. Fits LaStooge to a tee.

You seem to have a hard time understanding something so simple but that should be understood by any rational person
i made no mention of the video, so no I did not quote it
I really do not care what is in your video , as it does not change the underlying facts about the unsustainable debt accumulation
no you tuber can change the undeniable mathematics of the pending govt insolvency

now again
pay attention
if a farmer will become insolvent without government subsidies
then he will become insolvent when the government becomes insolvent

The debt the US government has accumulated in its 240 year history is projected to double in 9 years
government spending needs to be reigned in and needs to be reigned in RIGHT NOW
 
Last edited:

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
18,010
3,577
113
It's not at all. If you have ever travelled to second or third world countries, you can;t help but feel the human need to help out people. Unless you are an exploitve, selfish cheapskate.
1/2 Canadian families are $200 away from not paying their bills after taxes are deducted
yet our government has sent billions to Ukraine to fight a war and create corrupt millionaires

you have no right to call any tax payer a cheapskate because you have ever travelled to second or third world countries, and felt empathy for them
what is wrong with you ?
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
94,156
23,665
113
1/2 Canadian families are $200 away from not paying their bills after taxes are deducted
yet our government has sent billions to Ukraine to fight a war and create corrupt millionaires

you have no right to call any tax payer a cheapskate because you have ever travelled to second or third world countries, and felt empathy for them
what is wrong with you ?
You're arguing that because 1/2 of Canadian families are close to being bankrupt taxes for the rich should be cut?
Not that wages should be increased for 1/2 of Canadians or social services increased?

People who are that poor don't pay a lot of tax, but cutting HST would do them better. Income tax not so much.
Not cutting capital gains or corporate taxes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: shakenbake

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
18,010
3,577
113
Well considering you probably consume more dollars of health care than you pay in taxes, pay less gas tax on roads you drive on to to cover the actual cost, you are a recipeint of government handouts.
well consider instead that your ''probably'' is just a guess and consider you are wrong

but lets take your virtue signaling example a little further

so if Canadians as a whole consume more health care dollars than we pay in taxes and pay less gas tax on roads we drive on and employ far more government employee's than we can possible afford and send more money overseas than the benefits we derive from this generosity and run more social programs than we can possible afford and we regulate our most prosperous resource industries into oblivion , while throwing money at non productive special interest groups
oh lets not forget to invite more newcomers than we can possibly house


what do you get ?

Unmanageable and unsustainable govt deficits and debt

and if we continue doing this year after year after year what happens ?

The govt become insolvent

and then , no more free health care, no more Employment Insurance , no more education funding, no more social programs etc.
as the tax revenue goes instead to interest payments on debt or worse, no more lenders

government has to start managing tax dollars responsibly

especially when tax is the second largest single expense (after mortgage) for most Canadians
you can only tax an economy so much before lots of bad shit happens.
we are well beyond that point


i really can not understand why the left is so adamantly opposed to a financially responsible govt
as it is the cherished social safety net which they value so much that will be be put at risk by irresponsible govt spending and borrowing
 
Last edited:

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
94,156
23,665
113
well consider instead that your ''probably'' is just a guess and consider you are wrong

but lets take your virtue signaling example a little further

so if Canadians as a whole consume more health care dollars than we pay in taxes and pay less gas tax on roads we drive on and employ far more government employee's than we can possible afford and send more money overseas than the benefits we derive from this generosity and run more social programs than we can possible afford and we regulate our most prosperous resource industries into oblivion , while throwing money at non productive special interest groups


what do you get ?

Unmanageable and unsustainable govt deficits and debt

and if we continue doing this year after year after year what happens ?

The govt become insolvent

and then , no more free health care, no more Employment Insurance , no more education funding, no more social programs etc.
as the tax revenue goes to interest payments on debt

government has to start managing tax dollars responsibly
especially when tax is the second largest single expense (after mortgage) for most Canadians
you can only tax an economy so much before lots of bad shit happens.
we are well beyond that point
As if a felon and convicted fraud artist will manage public money responsibly.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts