That’s because bro went and shot a health care CEO not shot up a whole fucking school filled with children. It’s like you’re so desperate to own the Libs that you completely lack any sense of critical thinkingLeftists aren't talking about gun violence in this case.
If you think your post makes any sense, you need to seek therapy.That’s because bro went and shot a health care CEO not shot up a whole fucking school filled with children. It’s like you’re so desperate to own the Libs that you completely lack any sense of critical thinking
I think you do.If you think your post makes any sense, you need to seek therapy.
Let's expand on your position. Your argument is that when gun violence targets a CEO instead of a gang member or other innocent people it's somehow different?I think you do.
There is a huge difference between the violence of an insurance CEO, whose policy has fucked or ended the lives of hundreds of thousands, compared with daily random mass shootings.Let's expand on your position. Your argument is that when gun violence targets a CEO instead of a gang member or other innocent people it's somehow different?
Both involve gun violence regardless of motive and target.There is a huge difference between the violence of an insurance CEO, whose policy has fucked or ended the lives of hundreds of thousands, compared with daily random mass shootings.
Do you think I give a fuck about a healthcare CEO who fucked over millions of families and directly contributed to the deaths of innocent people?If you think your post makes any sense, you need to seek therapy.
Um, so it's a false equivalence. Kids are innocent. Healthcare CEO's are not. In fact they kill more kids than any school shooter.Both involve gun violence regardless of motive and target.
You say that the CEO ended the lives of hundreds of thousands. Yet he didn't do anything illegal.
It's okay to kill insurance CEOs? Gun violence is okay in this respect?
In other words it's not a gun violence issue because you agree with the shooter?
I'm not defending the CEO.Um, so it's a false equivalence. Kids are innocent. Healthcare CEO's are not. In fact they kill more kids than any school shooter.
Don't defend them. They would watch you die too. I don't care if it's legal. So was Slavery. So were Press Gangs. So was the Inquisition.
Yes, it is. Just like killing a dictator.Let's expand on your position. Your argument is that when gun violence targets a CEO instead of a gang member or other innocent people it's somehow different?
This guy has blown up on Tiktok and he deserves it for his talent, his other stuff is great.
Yes.Let's expand on your position. Your argument is that when gun violence targets a CEO instead of a gang member or other innocent people it's somehow different?
You generally make sense on most issues but on this one you are so off. You're actually morally justifying taking someone's life simply because their company's business practices are, at least on the surface, questionable. We cannot take that stand or nobody will want to run a large company. Being a CEO is a very challenging position and the sacrifices one makes to do that job are tremendous. You're basically on call 24/7/365, your life is your work. It affects your personal relationships. Many are in therapy. Yet we have folks who sit around and bitch about how this CEO made $10 million last year (most of it non cash), yet nobody blinks an eye when a mediocre NBA player pulls in a similar salary or a movie actor makes $18 million for 3 months of work on the set. What kind of fucking cosmic bunny hole have we fallen into here?Yes, it is. Just like killing a dictator.
Great video of recent reaction. He is becoming John Brown.
Best line one girl says she had "tears running down her legs"......
It's not about how much money. It's about the decisions he made to deny 32% of claims, double the national average. To illegally use an AI instead of an actual doctor that was 90% wrong to facilitate the denials.You generally make sense on most issues but on this one you are so off. You're actually morally justifying taking someone's life simply because their company's business practices are, at least on the surface, questionable. We cannot take that stand or nobody will want to run a large company. Being a CEO is a very challenging position and the sacrifices one makes to do that job are tremendous. You're basically on call 24/7/365, your life is your work. It affects your personal relationships. Many are in therapy. Yet we have folks who sit around and bitch about how this CEO made $10 million last year (most of it non cash), yet nobody blinks an eye when a mediocre NBA player pulls in a similar salary or a movie actor makes $18 million for 3 months of work on the set. What kind of fucking cosmic bunny hole have we fallen into here?
Hate to burst your bubble but OHIP denies coverage. Maybe not as frequently as 32% but it does. Particularly if you're over 80 years old. And as I said before you're just looking at a figure and not what drives that denial rate. You need to separate your emotions from the reality.It's not about how much money. It's about the decisions he made to deny 32% of claims, double the national average. To illegally use an AI instead of an actual doctor that was 90% wrong to facilitate the denials.
Imagine if OHIP did that, to save money. And it was your child denied coverage for a life saving, or changing procedure.
He was the CEO and therefore signed off on every policy that harmed policy holders. I have no sympathy, anymore than a chemical product CEO who illegally dumped into a water table toxic chemicals. Or to Tobacco company CEO's. Or that family that lied to Congress about the addictiveness of Opiods.
What he did was sociopathic. Downright evil.
Run it better.
But the fact is the insurance game is a gambling operation. They bet on taking money and not having to pay out. That is thevliteral business model. So the literal business model of health insurance is not to supply coverage, but to deny it. It's a fake middleman
And no one forced him into the position. So no, I have no sympathy for him anymore than any other drifter. Just because they have the title CEO doesn't morally absolve them.