Are Hisense decent TV's or should I stick with a Samsung?

LTO_3

Well-known member
Aug 27, 2004
1,078
815
113
Niagara Region
I have a LG that is surviving 8 years,

Got a HiSense 2 years now no problems.

Bought an Samsung 3 years ago for $2400, broke after 9 months and didn’t cover warranty. Took it to a store to fix it and it would have been $400. Looked for deals and Got a Hisense that lasted 2 years.

Never buy a Samsung
Sorry to hear that happened. I bought a Samsung (at Walmart which I despise but it was on sale) when my previous TV died on me and haven't had one problem with it in over 9-10 years. Would I buy another one? Possibly but would also consider a Hisense.

LTO_3
 

curvluvr

Well-known member
Mar 28, 2017
1,262
912
113
I have a LG that is surviving 8 years,

Got a HiSense 2 years now no problems.

Bought an Samsung 3 years ago for $2400, broke after 9 months and didn’t cover warranty. Took it to a store to fix it and it would have been $400. Looked for deals and Got a Hisense that lasted 2 years.

Never buy a Samsung
My Samsung TV's and cellphone have been great.
But I would never buy a Samsung appliance. I had the worst experience getting a Samsung appliance fixed under warranty, and I told their warranty customer service that I would never buy a Samsung appliance ever again, and I would suggest that to everyone I know.
 

Silkroad

Active member
Sep 25, 2001
213
52
28
I've had my 1080 dpi Samsung flat screen for more than 13 years. Never had a problem, picture and brightness still great. Bought it on sale from Sears. I've updated the firmware twice. Only issue is it won't play videos on a usb stick that use the newer 265 codec/compression. Have to convert them to the older 264 format.which increases the size of the file. I understand newer models don't have this issue. If that's the case, I'll be sticking with Samsung when it comes time for a new tv.
 
Last edited:

Vinson

Well-known member
Nov 24, 2023
1,922
1,712
113
My 11 old Samsung 40" blew something today and it smoked, picture was gone. I was looking at Costco and Bestbuy they had a lot of Roku TV. Hisense, TCL, Samsung. Samsung was more expensive and the salesman said that the Hisense were really good. Does anyone have experience with TV's ? I'm on a budget so I can't go for expenives Sony's. Thanks
Back in the day the Trinitrons use to last 30 years, these TV's nowadays are nice and thin, but don't last
 
  • Like
Reactions: anon1

versitile1

Well-known member
Jan 15, 2013
3,313
1,347
113
Back in the day the Trinitrons use to last 30 years, these TV's nowadays are nice and thin, but don't last
The old CRT TVs were built to last because back then it was a real investment to plunk down $1000 on a Sony. Problem was that they weighed about 500 lbs. I left mine behind many years ago because I didn’t want to deal with moving it anymore. It would probably still work. There are some people who still use them for playing retro video games and VHS movies etc. for the nostalgia I guess.
 

versitile1

Well-known member
Jan 15, 2013
3,313
1,347
113
I've had my 1080 dpi Samsung flat screen for more than 13 years. Never had a problem, picture and brightness still great. Bought it on sale from Sears. I've updated the firmware twice. Only issue is it won't play videos on a usb stick that use the newer 265 codec/compression. Have to convert them to the older 264 format.which increases the size of the file. I understand newer models don't have this issue. If that's the case, I'll be sticking with Samsung when it comes time for get a new tv.
I have a 42” LG I bought refurbished 14-15 years ago that still works that I use as my garage TV. I’ll probably upgrade this year because the remote broke a while back and it probably won’t survive another year out there.
 

superstar_88

The Chiseler
Jan 4, 2008
5,650
1,216
113
universal remote
 

versitile1

Well-known member
Jan 15, 2013
3,313
1,347
113
universal remote
Broke it too. TV is out in the garage so the floor is concrete. 1-2 drops and it’s cooked. Nah, TV is old with the wide bezel and it’s not 4K. Probably just gonna swap it with the one from my bedroom and get a better one there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: superstar_88

Vinson

Well-known member
Nov 24, 2023
1,922
1,712
113
I have a 42” LG I bought refurbished 14-15 years ago that still works that I use as my garage TV. I’ll probably upgrade this year because the remote broke a while back and it probably won’t survive another year out there.
😂 You needed a elephant to move those , we tried to gift one but nobody came to pick it up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: versitile1

versitile1

Well-known member
Jan 15, 2013
3,313
1,347
113
😂 You needed a elephant to move those , we tried to gift one but nobody came to pick it up.
If there was any sort of stairs involved, usually a disaster or injury was not far behind.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Vinson

Twister

Well-known member
Aug 24, 2002
4,689
435
83
GTA
Thank you all for the advice, I picked up a Samsung. They didn't have the Hisense in stock and I was tired of being without a TV. Interesting enough Costco, Walmart and Best buy all had the same price. I would've thought Costco would have a better price.
 

TauCeti

Member
Jan 18, 2025
82
83
18
Anyone here think bigger is better? I have a large space and am thinking of a 65”. Would smaller be better? Bigger? TIA
 

underground

Well-known member
May 28, 2010
489
281
63
I wish TV's these days had speakers bigger than a dime. You gotta buy a Soundbar or Home Theatre system to hear anything.... But the obsession with being the thinnest screen makes
this impossible. How about a thicker section along the bottom of the screen that protrudes out a few centimetres and put some proper speakers inside ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Steinlow

jeff2

Well-known member
Sep 11, 2004
1,672
909
113

Vinson

Well-known member
Nov 24, 2023
1,922
1,712
113
Anyone here think bigger is better? I have a large space and am thinking of a 65”. Would smaller be better? Bigger? TIA
if you have the space, bigger is better. but it has to be high definition otherwise it sucks. They have technology that makes large TV's high definition but don't skimp on the money.
 

GameBoy27

Well-known member
Nov 23, 2004
12,911
2,929
113
Samsung are generally very reliable. A friend has a 60' Samsung plasma that is still running great since 2010. Try for 120 Hz refresh rate, 240 Hz is better but is hard to find for a good deal.
OLED is traditionally better than QLED, but there is a difference in price. Current TV's that have built in YouTube, Netflix and Amazon Prime video apps are very very handy.
My 12 year old 60" Panasonic Plasma is still like new and still has a better picture than 90% of the TVs on the market today. Why? Deeper blacks and a higher refresh rate than current LED or QLED (backlit) TVs. The only thing I've seen that's better is the new OLED models. But even then, I'd say my Plasma still has a better, warmer realistic picture. Plasma and OLED have individual, self-lit pixels and a faster refresh rate, which make them better for sports, like football, hockey etc. You might not notice the difference if you're used to your own TV, but every time I watch sports on other TVs, I can pick up the motion blur, which doesn't happen on mine.

CNET used a Pioneer Kuro KURO Elite Plasma TV as the benchmark to compare every other TV to on the market. Then they stopped production. Afterwards, Panasonic hired all of their top engineers which lead to them producing the best TVs money could buy. Unfortunately Panasonic stopped making them in 2014. Even by today's standards, the decade old Panasonic Plasmas are still amazing TVs. Mind you, they weren't cheap and were quite power hungry.

If you do want to buy a new LED/QLED TV and you enjoy fast moving sports, do a little research and choose one that has a higher refresh rate. Your eyes will thank you. If you go with an OLED TV, you will no have problem with motion blur.

Hope this helps.
 

Goodfellow

Active member
Sep 24, 2018
77
105
33
My 12 year old 60" Panasonic Plasma is still like new and still has a better picture than 90% of the TVs on the market today. Why? Deeper blacks and a higher refresh rate than current LED or QLED (backlit) TVs. The only thing I've seen that's better is the new OLED models. But even then, I'd say my Plasma still has a better, warmer realistic picture. Plasma and OLED have individual, self-lit pixels and a faster refresh rate, which make them better for sports, like football, hockey etc. You might not notice the difference if you're used to your own TV, but every time I watch sports on other TVs, I can pick up the motion blur, which doesn't happen on mine.

CNET used a Pioneer Kuro KURO Elite Plasma TV as the benchmark to compare every other TV to on the market. Then they stopped production. Afterwards, Panasonic hired all of their top engineers which lead to them producing the best TVs money could buy. Unfortunately Panasonic stopped making them in 2014. Even by today's standards, the decade old Panasonic Plasmas are still amazing TVs. Mind you, they weren't cheap and were quite power hungry.

If you do want to buy a new LED/QLED TV and you enjoy fast moving sports, do a little research and choose one that has a higher refresh rate. Your eyes will thank you. If you go with an OLED TV, you will no have problem with motion blur.

Hope this helps.
I purchased my Panasonic Plasma 50” (high end model) from Kromer’s just before they closed up in 2012. Probably very similar to yours. Still works like brand new. I concur with everything you said.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts