Most fact-checkers lean much more to the left than the right.Well it also posts the other rightie Fact Checkers, though it did not include Fox.
But do you agree that the BBC is a Moderate Fact Checker?
In the past I posted Fact Checkers from The BBC, Reuters, Newsweek and Real Clear politics, but faced back lash from the righties!!
I have seen the reputable ones that "fact checked" parties on both The Left and The Right.Most fact-checkers lean much more to the left than the right.
What do you think that can lead to when "fact checking"?
When most fact checking media outlets are left leaning it leaves less non-partisan opportunities to others.I have seen the reputable ones that "fact checked" parties on both The Left and The Right.
Much more trustworthy than having someone like Musk conducting his own "Fact Checking"!!
Obviously, you are not keeping up with how Musk has reinstated those posting some real fake and dangerous posts on twitter in the past.When most fact checking media outlets are left leaning it leaves less non-partisan opportunities to others.
Community Notes are not Musk doing "his own fact checking". It's crowd sourced.
Don't spread misinformation.
A report in October by the nonprofit Center for Countering Digital Hate analyzed the Community Notes feature and found that accurate notes correcting false and misleading claims about the U.S. elections were not displayed on 209 out of a sample of 283 posts deemed misleading — or 74%.
Nope...this study says different and was much more thorough with a larger sample.Obviously, you are not keeping up with how Musk has reinstated those posting some real fake and dangerous posts on twitter in the past.
Bullshit about "crowd sourced"!! The so called Community Notes are not "Fact Checked" based on actual facts, but a political bias.
One such example is:
What is Community Notes, and how will it work on Facebook and Instagram?
Meta shocked the tech world this week by moving to overhaul its approach to fact checking. Here's what the changes mean for social media users.www.cbsnews.com
Then why is it that Meta's "Community Notes" applies only to the USA, and after the donation of $1 Million to the Trump inauguration?Nope...this study says different and was much more thorough with a larger sample.
https://academic.oup.com/pnasnexus/article/3/7/pgae217/7686087
Meta hasn't even implemented it yet in the US but will start there and then inevitably move to other countries like X did.Then why is it that Meta's "Community Notes" applies only to the USA, and after the donation of $1 Million to the Trump inauguration?
It is copied from X's platform. Well, well if it is supposed to be a "more reliable" form of fact checking, then why has it not also been implemented on Facebook in the UK and EU.
The answer is simple, much more stricter penalties applies, as the responsibility for the content lies with the platforms such as Facebook and X!!
It will be implemented in the USA in the not too distant future. The only reason to now cave in to Trump, is for the following reason:Meta hasn't even implemented it yet in the US but will start there and then inevitably move to other countries like X did.
I'm not sure what your argument is here?
Zuckerberg has been a target of Trump and his allies since he donated $400 million to help local officials run the 2020 election during the coronavirus pandemic. Those donations became part of a false narrative that the 2020 election was rigged against Trump, although there has never been any evidence of widespread fraud or problems that would have changed that result. Nonetheless, Republican-controlled states have banned future donations to local elections offices and Trump himself threatened to imprison Zuckerberg in a book published in September, during the peak of the presidential campaign.
Meta is among several tech companies apparently working to get in Trump’s good graces before he takes office later this month. Meta and Amazon each donated $1 million to Trump’s inauguration fund in December, and Zuckerberg had dinner with Trump at his Mar-a-Lago club in Florida.
Zuckerberg this week also appointed a key Trump ally, Ultimate Fighting Championship chief executive Dana White, to Meta’s board.
At a press conference hours later, Trump praised the changes.
“I think they’ve come a long way, Meta,” Trump said. When asked if he believed Zuckerberg made the changes in response to threats the incoming president has made, Trump responded: “Probably.”
O would love to see women having to register for selective service. It is, imo one of the final glass ceilings that need to be broken to show true equality between the sexes.There will be no political backlash from limiting women's role in combat. It's not an issue most American women and even less American men identify with.
You've probably heard the priority of the U.S. military should be lethality. I can share my opinion that I am concerned that encouraging female participation in combat not only interferes with lethality, but it might hurt recruitment efforts. Recruitment is a failure of our current military leadership.
No one is saying American women cannot serve in the U.S. military.
Interesting point.O would love to see women having to register for selective service. It is, imo one of the final glass ceilings that need to be broken to show true equality between the sexes.
I have no doubt all feminists will support this........
I think it's an all in or all out thing. We got rid of it here. But in a way it's a form of slavery. Especially because the rich kids tend to always get deferment. But giving a govt the power to force its population to fight and die for something they don't believe in is about as anti freedom as it gets.Interesting point.
I'm kind of conservative in that I think some type of mandatory service should be required for all young people.
I can't remember the last time I met a feminist who was opposed to this unless they were opposed to the selective service system existing at all for men or women.O would love to see women having to register for selective service. It is, imo one of the final glass ceilings that need to be broken to show true equality between the sexes.
I have no doubt all feminists will support this........
Selective service, of course, doesn't do anything other than note that you exist as a draftable person if a mandatory thing ever comes back.Interesting point.
I'm kind of conservative in that I think some type of mandatory service should be required for all young people.
Vietnam wasn't lost because of the effectiveness of the American fighting force. Coming off the U.S. experience in Korea, the U.S. thought it could replicate their limited success in that conflict. In retrospect, the Republic of Korea (South Korea) now looks like a major success.I think it's an all in or all out thing. We got rid of it here. But in a way it's a form of slavery. Especially because the rich kids tend to always get deferment. But giving a govt the power to force its population to fight and die for something they don't believe in is about as anti freedom as it gets.
They found that out the hard way in Vietnam how useless a fighting force you get.
Ah yes, when someone decides they are not supporting the Democrats any longer and decide to support Trump, they are suddenly a [insert derogatory name here].It will be implemented in the USA in the not too distant future. The only reason to now cave in to Trump, is for the following reason:
Meta eliminates fact-checking in latest bow to Trump
Facebook and Instagram owner Meta says it’s scrapping its third-party fact-checking program and replacing it with “community notes” written by users similar to the model used by Elon Musk’s social platform X.apnews.com
Now that Zuckerberg has become an ass kisser, Trump has confirmed it based on his threats!!
Not so long ago the righties on this Board were accusing the George Soros donations to the Democrats as "Highly Corrupt". But the Musk, Zuckerberg and other Corporate Heads financial assistance to Trump pales in comparison. That is even considering awarding Musk a position in his Government. Trump is even okay with Musk purchasing TikTok. A possible violation of ethics and real corruption!!Ah yes, when someone decides they are not supporting the Democrats any longer and decide to support Trump, they are suddenly a [insert derogatory name here].
Got it.
What does all that have to do with lefties supporting people until those people decide they prefer to support Trump, then the lefties demonize them?Not so long ago the righties on this Board were accusing the George Soros donations to the Democrats as "Highly Corrupt". But the Musk, Zuckerberg and other Corporate Heads financial assistance to Trump pales in comparison. That is even considering awarding Musk a position in his Government. Trump is even okay with Musk purchasing TikTok. A possible violation of ethics and real corruption!!
Did not the righties demonize the Democrats with this Soros crap in the past? Now that Trump is getting these richest oligarchs to donate heavily to his team, and even encourage Musk to dish out cash to his supporters during the campaign that would have been considered to be bribery under normal campaign regulations. Of course with the Republicans controlling both the House and Senate, this will not be investigated!!What does all that have to do with lefties supporting people until those people decide they prefer to support Trump, then the lefties demonize them?