Then fine.I disagree.
Use it uncritically.
At least you've announced you intend to.
Then fine.I disagree.
I provided the article that essentially shows that Frankfooter's comments were misinformation. You ignored that.Since when have you provided any proper proof?
Anyway, why do you seem to want to take it out on me, if you have a beef with someone else?
We see Mitchell posting tons of misinformation on daily basis from some online far right sources.
None of us lose our marbles over it like you are alleging!!
You are the one that is doing all the screaming all the time!!
Again, you are totally missing the point and you don't read...I said the Dens received more in donations than the Republicans. It wasn't about single donors it was about the total.Once again you caught the bull by the tail. The likes of Musk donated over $280 Million to the Republicans.
The righties always were condemning Soros for his donations to the Democrats and equating it with "corruption" in the past.
Maybe now you get it and stop your childish remarks that you are notorious for on a constant basis!!
![]()
I did no such thing and made no such statement.Then fine.
Use it uncritically.
At least you've announced you intend to.
Read your post.I did no such thing and made no such statement.
I already posted an article that rebuffed your argument against it. Trump cancelled the Biden Administration effort to Lower the Prescription Drug costs of other expensive prescriptions that were to be renegotiated for Medicare and Medicaid!!I provided the article that essentially shows that Frankfooter's comments were misinformation. You ignored that.
Frankfooter put me on ignore because I called him out on his misinformation (with proof) many times and it broke him.
You are getting sucked in by him because you are not calling him out and agreeing with him. So that's why I'm trying to help you.
Democrats and Republicans received more donations from the people itself as well as through The PACs rather than direct donations from the Billionaires. Now the whole point that you are missing is the manner in which Musk has donated to the Trump campaign:Again, you are totally missing the point and you don't read...I said the Dens received more in donations than the Republicans. It wasn't about single donors it was about the total.
Do you distract on purpose or do you seriously have issues following a conversation?
The practices in bold are a form of bribery. That was the whole point!!Musk has funneled more than $118 million into his pro-Trump America PAC, a super PAC dedicated to mobilizing voters in crucial swing states. His all-in commitment and headline-grabbing stunts have have garnered plenty of attention, not all of it positive. CNN reports that the Philadelphia D.A. is suing Musk over a highly publicized sweepstakes that gives $1 million to a different battleground state voter every day who agreed to sign a Musk petition.
Musk has direct personal and business interests in government policies, including federal EV tax credits, transportation spending, defense and aerospace contracts, corporate oversight and social media regulation. OpenSecrets says his emergence as a principal Trump surrogate represents a sharp break from Musk’s history of making smaller contributions to both parties. It ranks Tesla and SpaceX “in the top 10% of organizations tracked by OpenSecrets for lobbying and political contributions from their affiliates.”
Your article didn't rebuff Frankfooter's statements. Nice try at tap dancing.I already posted an article that rebuffed your argument against it. Trump cancelled the Biden Administration effort to Lower the Prescription Drug costs of other expensive prescriptions that were to be renegotiated for Medicare and Medicaid!!
But tell me why you do not pull up Mitchell for his real misinformation from some far right sources on a constant basis? Here he has posted some real crap that you hit a "Like" for it, though it is full of misinformation and just attacks on those that Trump now hates!!
My article does not "rebuff" but adds merit to Frankfooter's memes / posts. Maybe you should try to learn the difference between the two words for a change!!Your article didn't rebuff Frankfooter's statements. Nice try at tap dancing.
Mitchel posts without trying to also add misleading statements in a twisted narrative like Frankfooter does. He shares content without adding to the narrative. Content that can be easily found on social media everywhere,.
That's the different you can't wrap your head around while you cling to your buddy's ass and defend him while he lies to you.
Your article didn't prove that what he was peddling was true. Just keep swallowing what Frankfooter is feeding you...it actually makes it entertaining watching how gullible you are. Lol!My article does not "rebuff" but adds merit to Frankfooter's memes / posts. Maybe you should try to learn the difference between the two words for a change!!
Mitchell's posts from online far right conspiracy theorists probably only appeals to you and some of the other righties. It only gives the rest of us a chuckle at times!!
If you believe everything that you see on Social media then you are brainwashed and beyond redemption!!
You hate the facts, don't you?Your article didn't prove that what he was peddling was true. Just keep swallowing what Frankfooter is feeding you...it actually makes it entertaining watching how gullible you are. Lol!
The facts are that Frankfooter posted a tweet about healthcare costs going up as a result of Trump's actions.You hate the facts, don't you?
Listen you are confusing two different posts. The one about Soros was all about you stating that Musk, and the other billionaires are being condemned because they switched from Democrats to Republicans. I stated that when Soros donated to the Democrats, the righties always accused him of being "corrupt" and words to that extent. But this all started with the "Fact Checking" Posts with "X" and "Facebook"!!The facts are that Frankfooter posted a tweet about healthcare costs going up as a result of Trump's actions.
I posted an article that disproved that.
You posted an article about Soros for some reason.
I put you back on track.
Then you provided an article that was just speculative as your "proof".
Those are the facts.
I'm glad I'm still ignoring skoob.Listen you are confusing two different posts. The one about Soros was all about you stating that Musk, and the other billionaires are being condemned because they switched from Democrats to Republicans. I stated that when Soros donated to the Democrats, the righties always accused him of being "corrupt" and words to that extent. But this all started with the "Fact Checking" Posts with "X" and "Facebook"!!
The Healthcare was a totally different topic as that commenced from the Frankfooter Meme!! Maybe now you get it. But you did not disprove anything!!
Remember that not too long ago, you were also accusing me of spreading "false" information about Trump pardoning those violent insurrectionists.
We all know how that turned out!!
And that's why you distract...to confuse things.Listen you are confusing two different posts. The one about Soros was all about you stating that Musk, and the other billionaires are being condemned because they switched from Democrats to Republicans. I stated that when Soros donated to the Democrats, the righties always accused him of being "corrupt" and words to that extent. But this all started with the "Fact Checking" Posts with "X" and "Facebook"!!
The Healthcare was a totally different topic as that commenced from the Frankfooter Meme!! Maybe now you get it. But you did not disprove anything!!
Remember that not too long ago, you were also accusing me of spreading "false" information about Trump pardoning those violent insurrectionists.
We all know how that turned out!!
See you are the one that is as confused as hell. Tell me where I did stay that Soros "switched sides"?? I had used Soros as an example based on how righties had condemned him for donating to the Democrats, but they give a pass to the likes of Musk even when he seemed to violate the campaign regulations with his so called "prizes"!!And that's why you distract...to confuse things.
Soros never switched sides. The context was switching sides and then being condemned. Why did you bring Soros into this?
Frankfooter said costs would certainly go up, I shared an article that disproved that theory. You pretended you didn't see it? Yet still swallow Frankfooter's misinformation & brainwashing?






