Trump to be sentenced on Jan. 10 on 34 charges, before his Jan. 20 inauguration

[jimiagain]

jimiagain said:
Hens forth



You are embarrassingly ignorant.

1) You think that 4 and 5 letter words are big words.
2) You used the phrase but couldn't answer what it means.
3) Hint. It means nothing. There is no such phrase. You were trying to say ''henceforth", you moron.
Instead you talk about chickens.

You make yourself look so bad when you insult other people's education while displaying no intellect of your own. Whatever you post, I'm not responding. Enjoy yourself.

Welp that's exactly how I spelt it but windows indicated it was incorrect so I went with their corrected spelling. Do you honestly think I care about correct spelling on the internet? And moreover on an escort review board? You take yourself too seriously. Only because no one else does. I look forward to you never replying again. Good riddance. Would you please take Justin with you?

 

[squeezer]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1879223420669632717

It looks like they crucified lying fake Pete.

ALL HELL BREAKS LOOSE at Trump Hearing as MAN FORCIBLY CARRIED OUT!

 

[jimiagain]

LMAO

What a twat

 

[WyattEarp]

"the U.S. trade deficit sat at US$41 billion in 2023, according to figures from the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis"

Let's just stop this line of discussion. Just look up some headlines from some internet sources you trust.

 

[jalimon]

Let's just stop this line of discussion. Just look up some headlines from some internet sources you trust.

It's ok to be wrong you know. The commercial deficit of the US on trade versus Canada is peanuts for the US. Tariffs will hurt the US. Everyone is talking about steel or wood but Potash would be a big issue for American farmers.

 

[WyattEarp]

It's ok to be wrong you know. The commercial deficit of the US on trade versus Canada is peanuts for the US. Tariffs will hurt the US. Everyone is talking about steel or wood but Potash would be a big issue for American farmers.

Jalimon, post a link so I can help you interpret the data. I'm now guessing you're picking up the data for the U.S. trade deficit with just Canada.

If you go back, I said the U.S. trade deficit was $800 billion annually over the last few years. For some reason, you decided to contradict that statement.

 

[lomotil]

A piece of misogynistic work like Hegesth would never get consideration for nomination to the top defence position in the IDF where woman are an essential part of the army.
Only in Trump’s incoming shit circus would such a prosperous on all sides candidate be considered.
Trump is enamoured with Hegeseth’s character traits for obvious reasons.

 

[jimiagain]

A piece of misogynistic work like Hegesth would never get consideration for nomination to the top defence position in the IDF where woman are an essential part of the army.
Only in Trump’s incoming shit circus would such a prosperous on all sides candidate be considered.
Trump is enamoured with Hegeseth’s character traits for obvious reasons.

Still a bit sad I see. If it's any consolation 4 YEARS should fly by before you know it.

 

[squeezer]

LMAO

He's a pure twat! A lying phony Jesus-loving POS.

 

[WyattEarp]

A piece of misogynistic work like Hegesth would never get consideration for nomination to the top defence position in the IDF where woman are an essential part of the army.

A post in this histrionic tone suggests you're not interested in having a serious discussion. Perhaps you can surprise us.

I don't think it's a popular position in the U.S. that women should be allowed to be in combat units. Hegseth is a decorated Iraq War infantry officer. I think he has ground-level perspective of what is good for the U.S. Army and Marines front line units. Do you have combat experience you could share with us?

As far as your point about the IDF, when the U.S. is under the threat of ground attacks I will 100% support enlisting women into combat roles.

 

[WyattEarp]

He's a pure twat! A lying phony Jesus-loving POS.

I'm not sure what your point is other than being a Christian is a disqualifier.

 

[lomotil]

A post in this histrionic tone suggests you're not interested in having a serious discussion. Perhaps you can surprise us.

I don't think it's a popular position in the U.S. that women should be allowed to be in combat units. Hegseth is a decorated Iraq War infantry officer. I think he has ground-level perspective of what is good for the U.S. Army and Marines front line units. Do you have combat experience you could share with us?

As far as your point about the IDF, when the U.S. is under the threat of ground attacks I will 100% support enlisting women into combat roles.

There are more American highly decorated and both lower and higher ranking female military personnel than Hegseth to negate your and his position.
Trump the cowardly draft dodger had his son issue the statement that nobody will be nominated “who think that they no better” .
If the military tolerates misogyny similar to what Trump and Hegseth have routinely perpetrated than yes woman should not be in combat units.

 

[WyattEarp]

There are more American highly decorated and both lower and higher ranking female military personnel than Hegseth to negate your and his position.
Trump the cowardly draft dodger had his son issue the statement that nobody will be nominated “who think that they no better” .
If the military tolerates misogyny similar to what Trump and Hegseth have routinely perpetrated than yes woman should not be in combat units.

There will be no political backlash from limiting women's role in combat. It's not an issue most American women and even less American men identify with.

You've probably heard the priority of the U.S. military should be lethality. I can share my opinion that I am concerned that encouraging female participation in combat not only interferes with lethality, but it might hurt recruitment efforts. Recruitment is a failure of our current military leadership.

No one is saying American women cannot serve in the U.S. military.

 

[bver_hunter]

Not sure...why don't you ask them?
I was just responding to your request for more info.

Well it also posts the other rightie Fact Checkers, though it did not include Fox.
But do you agree that the BBC is a Moderate Fact Checker?
In the past I posted Fact Checkers from The BBC, Reuters, Newsweek and Real Clear politics, but faced back lash from the righties!!

 

[WyattEarp]

Well it also posts the other rightie Fact Checkers, though it did not include Fox.
But do you agree that the BBC is a Moderate Fact Checker?
In the past I posted Fact Checkers from The BBC, Reuters, Newsweek and Real Clear politics, but faced back lash from the righties!!

I have no dog in this current debate.

I just wanted to say the whole "fact checking" thing kind of destroyed itself. I think some bad actors on the left and right turned fact checking into another propaganda arm.

I used to find it interesting to read some of the reasoning or lack of reasoning that went behind a fact check. I'm now fine with just reading commentary that offers opinions on politics, policy and current events.

I'm guessing the reliability of the BBC fact check depends on the issue and the actual BBC fact checkers assigned.

 

[richaceg]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1879560640483959078

Sexy pretty and intelligent...the perfect combo.

 

[Skoob]

Well it also posts the other rightie Fact Checkers, though it did not include Fox.
But do you agree that the BBC is a Moderate Fact Checker?
In the past I posted Fact Checkers from The BBC, Reuters, Newsweek and Real Clear politics, but faced back lash from the righties!!

Most fact-checkers lean much more to the left than the right.

What do you think that can lead to when "fact checking"?

 

[bver_hunter]

Most fact-checkers lean much more to the left than the right.

What do you think that can lead to when "fact checking"?

I have seen the reputable ones that "fact checked" parties on both The Left and The Right.
Much more trustworthy than having someone like Musk conducting his own "Fact Checking"!!

 

[Skoob]

I have seen the reputable ones that "fact checked" parties on both The Left and The Right.
Much more trustworthy than having someone like Musk conducting his own "Fact Checking"!!

When most fact checking media outlets are left leaning it leaves less non-partisan opportunities to others.

Community Notes are not Musk doing "his own fact checking". It's crowd sourced.

Don't spread misinformation.

 

[bver_hunter]

When most fact checking media outlets are left leaning it leaves less non-partisan opportunities to others.

Community Notes are not Musk doing "his own fact checking". It's crowd sourced.

Don't spread misinformation.

Obviously, you are not keeping up with how Musk has reinstated those posting some real fake and dangerous posts on twitter in the past.
Bullshit about "crowd sourced"!! The so called Community Notes are not "Fact Checked" based on actual facts, but a political bias.
One such example is:

A report in October by the nonprofit Center for Countering Digital Hate analyzed the Community Notes feature and found that accurate notes correcting false and misleading claims about the U.S. elections were not displayed on 209 out of a sample of 283 posts deemed misleading — or 74%.

What is Community Notes, and how will it work on Facebook and Instagram?

Meta shocked the tech world this week by moving to overhaul its approach to fact checking. Here's what the changes mean for social media users.

www.cbsnews.com