The Right Should DUMP Andrew TateDefinitely. I mean, not as manly as Tate but he's definitely manly. And essentially the most powerful man on the planet at the moment so that's extra manly.
The Right Should DUMP Andrew TateDefinitely. I mean, not as manly as Tate but he's definitely manly. And essentially the most powerful man on the planet at the moment so that's extra manly.
Not surprising. They don't teach big words until high school so you missed out. Maybe you could ask your kids to help you with the google and you can figure it out.I have never in my life seen that phrase used.
What does it mean?
Another brilliant response by squeegee kid. Your intellect is really elevating these days.If you say so Wyatt.
Sigh. When are you going to learn that trying to weaponize the legal system is never going to work? Tate for Prime Minister! You know you're little more than a glorified amoeba.The Right Should DUMP Andrew Tate
2 questions Jimi,Sigh. When are you going to learn that trying to weaponize the legal system is never going to work? Tate for Prime Minister! You know you're little more than a glorified amoeba.![]()
You even insult folks when the post is directed at someone else. Do you feel Wyatt cannot respond for himself, I think he does pretty good defending himself. You should have confidence in Wyatt, I do.Another brilliant response by squeegee kid. Your intellect is really elevating these days.![]()
Its all open right now.I do agree with you Pee Pee will be getting a shot. I want to know, if eggs, bread, and the cost of living over the next 4 years doesn't go down, will you criticize Trumputin and Pee Pee and shout from the rooftops it's time for them to go!!!
He's still in power.It seems that you spend a lot time defending the Trudeau Administration. It is over.
If you say so squeeze.Do you feel Wyatt cannot respond for himself, I think he does pretty good defending himself.
Okay Ross, we're on a break.I think Biden did not ban exports. They paused some of the applications for new receivers as they evaluated them, and it did not disrupt the previously authorized. According to the US DOE own website (from about a year ago, so maybe I missed an update which I currently cannot find):
"The temporary pause in reviewing new non-FTA (Free-Trade Agreement) export applications. It will not affect operating LNG facilities or additional already authorized LNG exports. It will not disrupt projects under construction."
Again, maybe I missed an update..
Spoken like a true groomer. Is that the line you use on prepubescent boys in the library washroom ? asking for a friend who happens to be a copInsult? All I've done is show you support with your closeted homosexuality. There were no insults or profanity. Please don't report me again. I just want you to embrace your true self. Is that so wrong?![]()
what do you think threatening tariffs do to long term investments ?Okay Ross, we're on a break.
Pauses, reviews, permitting.......no clever politician uses an absolute word like ban. These are ways to slow down and hinder the exporting of Natural Gas. (The U.S. has more than enough for its own consumption.) If every time a Democratic Administration takes power and the bureaucracy uses these tactics, it discourages the large, long-term investments needed in energy production and distribution.
This is what Biden said about the pause. “This pause on new LNG approvals sees the climate crisis for what it is: the existential threat of our time..”
So the man is telling you himself that the pause and reviews are not intended to be benign process policies, but rather a direct effort to discourage U.S. LNG exports.
It's not good, but there are bigger objectives in mind. To avoid not getting into the weeds too much, let's say it might give pause to an American manufacturer thinking about moving production to Mexico or elsewhere.what do you think threatening tariffs do to long term investments ?
Who's PeePee?He's still in power.
All the right wingers do here is repeat disinformation talking points like 'the system is broken'.
None of them know the issues well enough to understand how or if they can be fixed and what PeePee might do towards that.
It's not good, but there are bigger objectives in mind. To avoid not getting into the weeds too much, let's say it might give pause to an American manufacturer thinking about moving production to Mexico or elsewhere.
or give pause to American companies that were thinking of expanding because of inevitable retaliation and higher costs of supplies like Canadian steel and aluminum.It's not good, but there are bigger objectives in mind. To avoid not getting into the weeds too much, let's say it might give pause to an American manufacturer thinking about moving production to Mexico or elsewhere.
Trump needs to look at the big picture though right?It's not good, but there are bigger objectives in mind. To avoid not getting into the weeds too much, let's say it might give pause to an American manufacturer thinking about moving production to Mexico or elsewhere.
No, he should follow the liberal media pundits with biased and narrow perspectives.Trump needs to look at the big picture though right?




