Illegal migrant set train passenger on fire and watched her burn to death

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
30,611
4,818
113
That still does not mean open borders.
You can criticize the decision to let them in but saying it is open borders is not accurate.
It's about enforcement of laws and policy. No nation has "open borders". Porous is probably a better description. But it's about messaging so "open" is a simpler term.

Considering Obama was the Deporter in Chief and build the kiddie cages I never saw the Dems as open border. Just quite hypocritical in their messaging. But the messaging is part of the problem. It encouraged people to try. And weaker enforcement due to optics(although I laughed when they used Obama era pictures of Kids in Cages to try to bust on Trump) and trying to please a vocal base just created more problems.

The citizens of the USA don't like to admit a portion of their economy has always relied on, dating back to slavery, with having a controlled minority to handle domestic work, farm work, and other menial tasks. Preferably one law enforcement is free to handle roughly to keep them in line.

Democrats, if they really believed in freedom, would roll back sanctions policy that drives people to seek asylum. And make laws that punish the employers of illegals. That would kill the market.

Of course then the rich fucks would have to pay fair wages, and the Dem donors don't want that either.
 

Shaquille Oatmeal

Well-known member
Jun 2, 2023
2,485
1,908
113
But it's about messaging so "open" is a simpler term.
And it would also be a false term to use.
There were more deportations under Biden than under Trump per the article I posted above.
By the way all borders are porous.
There is no real requirement to have an "airtight" border.
Its not even possible in my opinion.
Even heavily militarized ones like the North Korean border has had successful defections.
Illegal immigration is an issue but it is not the most important.
I can think of atleast 5 others before immigration.
It has been used as a dogwhistle to rally a base of voters and made into the top issue.
The majority of the people talking about immigration have absolutely no interaction with immigrants in their daily lives.
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
30,611
4,818
113
And it would also be a false term to use.
There were more deportations under Biden than under Trump per the article I posted above.
By the way all borders are porous.
There is no real requirement to have an "airtight" border.
Its not even possible in my opinion.
Even heavily militarized ones like the North Korean border has had successful defections.
Illegal immigration is an issue but it is not the most important.
I can think of atleast 5 others before immigration.
It has been used as a dogwhistle to rally a base of voters and made into the top issue.
The majority of the people talking about immigration have absolutely no interaction with immigrants in their daily lives.
Stop being so literal.
 

southpaw

Well-known member
May 21, 2002
357
409
113
Its not even possible in my opinion.
Even heavily militarized ones like the North Korean border has had successful defections.
How many defections? A million each year? If you can't stop everyone, should you not stop anyone? The Korean DMZ is more secure than the US southern border.
 

Shaquille Oatmeal

Well-known member
Jun 2, 2023
2,485
1,908
113
How many defections? A million each year? If you can't stop everyone, should you not stop anyone? The Korean DMZ is more secure than the US southern border.
The US already stops 100s of thousands.
Law enforcement already exists.
My point is immigration is blown out of proportion as an issue.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mandrill

southpaw

Well-known member
May 21, 2002
357
409
113
The US already stops 100s of thousands.
Law enforcement already exists.
My point is immigration is blown out of proportion as an issue.
The US electorate disagrees with you.
 

mandrill

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2001
76,815
89,299
113
It's about enforcement of laws and policy. No nation has "open borders". Porous is probably a better description. But it's about messaging so "open" is a simpler term.

Considering Obama was the Deporter in Chief and build the kiddie cages I never saw the Dems as open border. Just quite hypocritical in their messaging. But the messaging is part of the problem. It encouraged people to try. And weaker enforcement due to optics(although I laughed when they used Obama era pictures of Kids in Cages to try to bust on Trump) and trying to please a vocal base just created more problems.

The citizens of the USA don't like to admit a portion of their economy has always relied on, dating back to slavery, with having a controlled minority to handle domestic work, farm work, and other menial tasks. Preferably one law enforcement is free to handle roughly to keep them in line.

Democrats, if they really believed in freedom, would roll back sanctions policy that drives people to seek asylum. And make laws that punish the employers of illegals. That would kill the market.

Of course then the rich fucks would have to pay fair wages, and the Dem donors don't want that either.
You do realize that the current wave of asylum seekers comes from Central America and those places have fuck all to do with "sanctions"??

And the asylum seekers came in caravans when Trump was last in power. It's go fuck all to do with who is in power and a lot to do with utter desperation.

Ask when the GOP is going to resile from the UNCHR. That would stop the caravans. But the GOP won't attempt to stem the flow of asylum seekers. They will denounce it, but secretly work to increase it. That way, they can point to the statistics and claim that it's a crisis.

It's bullshit and lies and marketing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Shaquille Oatmeal

squeezer

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2010
20,912
15,508
113
The real local homegrown citizens. A mass shooting culprit caught live. Of course, it was racially motivated.

Thoughts and prayers....Yeah, ok. Although all the victims survived their injuries. He wasn't very efficient.

 
  • Like
Reactions: mandrill

southpaw

Well-known member
May 21, 2002
357
409
113
"My point is immigration is blown out of proportion as an issue."
Unfortunately they are inundated with the propaganda.
Here are some facts then. This is not blown out of proportion. This is the greatest existential threat the US currently faces.

 

Shaquille Oatmeal

Well-known member
Jun 2, 2023
2,485
1,908
113
Here are some facts then. This is not blown out of proportion. This is the greatest existential threat the US currently faces.

The numbers aren't big enough to call this the number 1 issue the US faces or that it is an existential threat (which seems to indicate that America's sovereignty is under threat).
There are several more important issues - healthcare, the economy, deficit, debt, inflation, Gun violence, violent crime, etc that are more important than illegal immigration.
The numbers can also mislead and are used dishonestly by Republicans in very simplistic narratives. Your article explains it well.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: mandrill

southpaw

Well-known member
May 21, 2002
357
409
113
...or that it is an existential threat (which seems to indicate that America's sovereignty is under threat).
That's exactly what it indicates. The unauthorized entry of millions of foreign citizens into your territory amounts to an invasion. It may be an unarmed invasion, but it is an invasion all the same. And an invasion is a threat to your sovereignty.

Ask Japan, or China, or India, or the Gulf States, on how they would respond to a situation like this at their borders.
 

Shaquille Oatmeal

Well-known member
Jun 2, 2023
2,485
1,908
113
That's exactly what it indicates. The unauthorized entry of millions of foreign citizens into your territory amounts to an invasion. It may be an unarmed invasion, but it is an invasion all the same. And an invasion is a threat to your sovereignty.

Ask Japan, or China, or India, or the Gulf States, on how they would respond to a situation like this at their borders.
The article suggests that the majority of them are removed right away.
The numbers posted in the article are not in any way alarming.
There is also a process for asylum seekers, removals, paroles etc. which needs to be followed.
It is hardly an "invasion" or a threat to sovereignty considering these migrants have no weapons, or even rights to vote and are being allowed in by border patrol and the immigration courts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mandrill

southpaw

Well-known member
May 21, 2002
357
409
113
... and are being allowed in by border patrol and the immigration courts.
You've identified the problem. US voters identified Trump as the solution. Whether he succeeds remains to be seen. But he was their best bet.
 

Shaquille Oatmeal

Well-known member
Jun 2, 2023
2,485
1,908
113
You've identified the problem.
Well, so it is not an invasion.
I dont think it is a problem because they are processed at the processing centers before being allowed in.
I also dont think Trump will succeed given the logistics and legal procedures involved.
But yes, it remains to be seen, what will transpire.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mandrill

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
13,581
2,100
113
Ghawar
Well, so it is not an invasion.
..............

English is not my 1st language. If someone intrudes into my home
without permission and against my will I might call it home invasion.
But after I consult a lawyer my wording will be more precise. I will
probably call it unlawful entry instead in the court. But I have to be an
absolute literalist to argue over whether it is wrongfull to call the
intruder a home invader.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bucktee and wpgguy
Toronto Escorts