Right?!Aren't they supposed to be in great shape?
They want a straight shot, when it's a secondary mode of transportation. You want to ride your bike to work, then take a more circuitous route and enjoy the benefits of the ride ahead.
Right?!Aren't they supposed to be in great shape?
You omitted the most important thing. Was it a "Looney Dogs Night"?
European cities have fewer cars per capita and more transit. They also generally have more bike lanes.
Who Owns the Most Vehicles per Capita, by Country?
Here are the highest vehicles per capita by country as a growing global middle class is fueling car ownership rates around the world.www.visualcapitalist.com
Bikes take up way less space on the road per person, same with buses.
Cars and parked cars take up more than their share.
You want more space on roads make people drive smaller cars and ban parking on roads like Yonge and Bloor.
This has been the topic of numerous threads and has been explained to the bikies several times already. They ignore it.You missed the point.
European cities are much older, with historical buildings, fountains and such, and are built upon ancient cities from before their time. I see lots of vehicles, taxis and private vehicles and many tourist buses and just as many scooters as both of those. They have more subways, built through this labyrinth of history, and have a better use of their roads than Toronto, a supposedly "world class city" with a joke of a transit system. Their bike lanes work quite well, as does their road system working well too. Do they have some gridlock? Absolutely, just like any city, but these old cities aren't in perpetual gridlock like Toronto is. I recall getting off the DVP, about a year ago, and it took a little over an hour, to go from Richmond and Parliament, to the Harbour Castle at mid afternoon. Thankfully they have the bike lanes down there, for the handful of bikes to flow freely through the gridlock, while everyone else sat there and fumed. If memory serves me correctly, it took about 30 minutes to get through the lights at Jarvis and Richmond. I guess it's my fault though, for coming into the city without my bike to get around.
How many of those cities have congestion charges?You missed the point.
European cities are much older, with historical buildings, fountains and such, and are built upon ancient cities from before their time. I see lots of vehicles, taxis and private vehicles and many tourist buses and just as many scooters as both of those. They have more subways, built through this labyrinth of history, and have a better use of their roads than Toronto, a supposedly "world class city" with a joke of a transit system. Their bike lanes work quite well, as does their road system working well too. Do they have some gridlock? Absolutely, just like any city, but these old cities aren't in perpetual gridlock like Toronto is. I recall getting off the DVP, about a year ago, and it took a little over an hour, to go from Richmond and Parliament, to the Harbour Castle at mid afternoon. Thankfully they have the bike lanes down there, for the handful of bikes to flow freely through the gridlock, while everyone else sat there and fumed. If memory serves me correctly, it took about 30 minutes to get through the lights at Jarvis and Richmond. I guess it's my fault though, for coming into the city without my bike to get around.
This has been the topic of numerous threads and has been explained to the bikies several times already. They ignore it.
Annie then posts photos of the DVP and 401 gridlocked and tells us that bike lanes would solve those problems.
The city is only now building RT lines to Don Mills, an "LA style subdivision" that was built for car access 60+ years ago. Toronto transit is a joke. You need a car to get in and out of downtown in this city.
How many of those cities have congestion charges?
You want more space for cars downtown over pedestrian and biking use, make it more expensive for drivers to drive downtown like they do in the European cities you think work.
Congestion charges ranked as the most effective way to reduce car use in cities - Cities Today
The study ranks the 12 most effective measures that European cities have incorporated in recent decades to reduce car numbers.cities-today.com
They believe that they can ban cars and that people will bicycle from Little Portugal or Cabbagetown to and from jobs in Brampton and Whitby..... They are dummies.Toronto has talked about levies on cars entering the city in the past. They bring this up like it's the answer to all their woes, when it's just a taxation for them to collect, without benefit to the realities of the gridlock that they help perpetuate, with things like bike lanes.
Except that it would work but it would piss off DoFo's suburban base.Toronto has talked about levies on cars entering the city in the past. They bring this up like it's the answer to all their woes, when it's just a taxation for them to collect, without benefit to the realities of the gridlock that they help perpetuate, with things like bike lanes.
You have become the Ana Kasparian of terb.They believe that they can ban cars and that people will bicycle from Little Portugal or Cabbagetown to and from jobs in Brampton and Whitby..... They are dummies.
How laughable is this. Now lack of bike lanes has become a health crisis.
Doug doesn't care about facts.
No wonder he had to include legislation blocking anyone from suing his government over deaths and injuries caused by cutting bike lanes.How laughable is this. Now lack of bike lanes has become a health crisis.
Oh you mean like big pharma has immunity from covid vaccine injuries and death. Ride your bike in a safer location like a bike path or residential neighborhood.No wonder he had to include legislation blocking anyone from suing his government over deaths and injuries caused by cutting bike lanes.
What a frickin joke!I recall getting off the DVP, about a year ago, and it took a little over an hour, to go from Richmond and Parliament, to the Harbour Castle at mid afternoon. Thankfully they have the bike lanes down there, for the handful of bikes to flow freely through the gridlock, while everyone else sat there and fumed. If memory serves me correctly, it took about 30 minutes to get through the lights at Jarvis and Richmond. I guess it's my fault though, for coming into the city without my bike to get around.
Not only are you against vaccines making people safer you're also against bike lanes that make people safer?Oh you mean like big pharma has immunity from covid vaccine injuries and death. Ride your bike in a safer location like a bike path or residential neighborhood.
You don't absorb what people point out to you.What a frickin joke!
What did you expect would happen?
Fuckers from the suburbs and inner suburbs still stuck in a time and age that no long exists.
But of course, it couldn't have been:
- the sheer amount of idiot motor vehicle drivers overwhelming the roads
- construction, Ontario Line closures, Gardiner rehab road closures
- necessary stoplights
- motor vehicle gridlock
- motor vehicle blocking the the box
- motor vehicle illegal stopping/parking taking up a lane and blocking traffic
What, you mean when a cyclist is injured or killed in a collision with a car, it doesn't matter who was at fault? Just blame the car driver, because they're in a car? I for one, would never put myself in danger by riding on that the road of that section of the Bayview Extension. Especially when there's a wide, dedicated bike lane that runs parallel to it. Not victim blaming, but why put yourself in danger when you don't have to. Doesn't make any sense to me.Weak AF response.
Aligns with your M.O. though.
"Not only are you against vaccines making people safer you're also against bike lanes that make people safer"Not only are you against vaccines making people safer you're also against bike lanes that make people safer?
You can believe in santa claus too if you need to."Not only are you against vaccines making people safer you're also against bike lanes that make people safer"
No I just don't believe they do. And they don't calm traffic. They create it.
Santa Claus is more of a reality than anything you believe in.You can believe in santa claus too if you need to.
Its just not reality.