Apparently against the use of Govt issued only I.D they are.Democrats aren't against these things.
Apparently against the use of Govt issued only I.D they are.Democrats aren't against these things.
Many Democrats are against it.Democrats aren't against these things
You're going to be so happy over the next month or two, with me not around.God, what a word salad, wonder where you get that from......
"Gov't issued only ID" - nice word salad.Apparently against the use of Govt issued only I.D they are.
Every single one of those states requires identification in order to register to vote.Many Democrats are against it.
Why do you think California, NY, Oregon, Washington....etc still dont require ID to vote??
Butler where on earth did you get the notion that the ID laws favours the Democratic Party? There were 60 plus court cases brought against the so called voter fraud, including this voter ID and yet those cases had no evidence and they were thrown out of court. What has this Voter ID got to do with me? I stated what these regulations that States implements does conform and if Voter ID has to be mandated, then so should the Electoral college that is flawed as well. Why can you not accept that simple fact......oic because to butler it favour The Republicans, and so that is why it is considered to be a "distraction". I did not lose, but you have the tail between your legs and yes.... move on!!Yes. And they need to change the voter I.D laws in those states. It's that simple. The issue isn't about "following the rules". It's about changing flawed laws.
I know the last thing you want is to have voter I.D laws as it will affect votes you want to go to the Democratic Party.
As for the EC of course to should be gone. Don't be silly. But it has nothing to do with voter I.D. and btw it would be much easier to modify a State Constitution for I.D laws then to change the EC.
It's a distraction to discuss the EC. You lost. Move on.
Photo I.D from a recognized and verifiable govt source. Private photo I.D is not an acceptable choice"Gov't issued only ID" - nice word salad.
But good, as always, to see you move the goalposts when I point out you're full of shit.
You can't even stick to your guns on something as simple as "proof of address? Photo I.D?".
So is your claim now that Democrats are against using government issued ID to vote?
Or are they against laws mandating using only government-issued ID to vote?
I will be indifferent. Really? You think you are that important? Have fun whatever it is you are doing. And Pleae, don't rush back on my account.You're going to be so happy over the next month or two, with me not around.
You could have just waited for a day and ignored this instead of admitting you can't follow the thread of your own conversation.
Ask Val, he is one saying laws requiring ID at the polls favors the GOP.Butler where on earth did you get the notion that the ID laws favours the Democratic Party? There were 60 plus court cases brought against the so called voter fraud, including this voter ID and yet those cases had no evidence and they were thrown out of court. What has this Voter ID got to do with me? I stated what these regulations that States implements does conform and if Voter ID has to be mandated, then so should the Electoral college that is flawed as well. Why can you not accept that simple fact......oic because to butler it favour The Republicans, and so that is why it is considered to be a "distraction". I did not lose, but you have the tail between your legs and yes.... move on!!
Now I get it where you came ut with this 20 Million votes numbers that you will not respond to when asked in the first place, but started this Voter ID Distraction. Here it goes:Says the guy who won't answer why he doesn't support proper voter ID for every election.
For once go by the facts butler:Ask Val, he is one saying laws requiring ID at the polls favors the GOP.
In the first two decades of the twenty-first century, many American state governments implemented voter identification (ID) laws for elections held in their states. These laws, which commonly mandate photo ID and/or require significant effort by voters lacking ID, sparked an ongoing national debate over the tension between election security and access in a democratic society. The laws’ proponents—primarily politicians in the Republican Party—claim that they prevent voter fraud, while Democratic opponents denounce the disproportionate burden they place on historically disadvantaged groups such as the poor and people of color. While these positions may reflect sincerely held beliefs, they also align with the political parties’ rational electoral strategies because the groups most likely to be disenfranchised by the laws tend to support Democratic candidates. Are these partisan views on the impact of voter ID correct? Existing research focuses on how voter ID laws affect voter turnout and fraud. But the extent to which they produce observable electoral benefits for Republican candidates and/or penalize Democrats remains an open question. We examine how voter ID impacts the parties’ electoral fortunes in races at the state level (state legislatures and governorships) and federal level (United States Congress and president) during 2003 to 2020. Our results suggest negligible average effects but with some heterogeneity over time. The first laws implemented produced a Democratic advantage, which weakened to near zero after 2012. We conclude that voter ID requirements motivate and mobilize supporters of both parties, ultimately mitigating their anticipated effects on election results.
In 2020, while President Joe Biden won the popular vote by more than 7 million votes, his Electoral College victory was decided by fewer than 50,000 votes in a few close states.
laws requiring ID at the polls favours no one except the electorateAsk Val, he is one saying laws requiring ID at the polls favors the GOP.
Once again. You are Completely clueless, off topic, not understanding the thread, and off in your own little worldFor once go by the facts butler:
On the other hand :
Majority of Americans continue to favor moving away from Electoral College
Majority of Americans continue to favor moving away from Electoral College
63% of U.S. adults say the way the president is elected should be changed so that the winner of the popular vote nationwide wins the presidency.www.pewresearch.org
That is why the Electoral College Reform makes much more total sense. it's present Protocols in the various States are not consistent!!
You lost once again butler!!
Read the title of the Thread again!! If Voter ID relates to it, then how does the Electoral College go "Off topic"??Once again. You are Completely clueless, off topic, not understanding the thread, and off in your own little world
Once again Trump's Circus is a Comedy Show, that is likely to screw up the lives of the Americans.Elon Musk Has ‘MASSIVE BLOWUP’ With Trump Staff! | The Kyle Kulinski Show
Kyle just called Elon an autistic freak, lol...That's not to inclusive now is it?Once again Trump's Circus is a Comedy Show, that is likely to screw up the lives of the Americans.
His cabinet picks if it included Laurel and Hardy or Mr. Bean would have been far more credible than these present bunch of comedians!!
When you switch back to your Feherty Fellow Photo then I will bring Stormy Back in the mix!!Kyle just called Elon an autistic freak, lol...That's not to inclusive now is it?
Krystal needs to rein her toy back in perhaps...
And quoting Rolling Stone, c'mon..LOL...
Where's your Stormy signature pic?...Free Stormy!!
1) Matt Gaetz abominated by Herr Trump for A.G.Once again Trump's Circus is a Comedy Show, that is likely to screw up the lives of the Americans.
His cabinet picks if it included Laurel and Hardy or Mr. Bean would have been far more credible than these present bunch of comedians!!
This RFK?1) Matt Gaetz abominated by Herr Trump for A.G.
The only experience this notorious serial pedophile has with criminal investigations is being the subject of criminal investigations.
2) Tulsi 'The Manchurian Female Candidate"' GrabbedHer nominated by neo-Tsarist Kleptocrat Putin for DNI via proxy cast by "Tell me what you want me to do Vlady" Trump.
The only experience and qualifications she has with national security and top-secret intelligence is being the go-to-gurl of the aforementioned for her handlers, Putin and the rest of America's adversarial autocrats all around the world. I mean what could possibly go wrong with this pick?
3) RFK Jr. bloviated by the Stable Genius for Sec. of HHS
The only experience and expertise this moth eaten, brain-wormed nincompoop has with health and human services is listening to Joe Rogaine podcasts and starting his ivermectin treatment too late.