I see you totally missed the essence of my statement.
When asked, Carroll couldn't remember the year it happened.
Elon Musk to head Trump's Gestapo.
- Thread starter Ceiling Cat
- Start date
When asked, Carroll couldn't remember the year it happened.
They ruled that trump raped Carroll but couldn't confirm whether it was his mushroom dick or finger.
You think they ordered him to pay $80 million just for his usual insults?
Are you arguing that its not rape if you can't get your tiny dick inside?So they can't prove his tiny penis got in...no rape
That's almost as good as calling rape 'rough sex'.
again with your weird interpretations... the verdict was no rape...the case is closed. Trump is ordered to pay 80M for defamation. keep crying...
Yes.So they can't prove his tiny penis got in...no rape
That was the explicit question they were asked to decide.
That was the law at the time.
He could have held her down and skull fucked her and they would have voted no on rape as well. It had to be Penis in Vagina.
I didn't miss it at all.
It's just irrelevant to the discussion of the statute of limitations.
How can someone establish the expiry if they can't even remember the year it happened?
she got 80 M ??
yikes
right or wrong that's a massive payday for defamation
I do not know about you but I am sure there is a lot of Canadians who feel they have been violated and insulted in public by Trudeau
How much coin does Justin have ?
Last edited:
It was long past it so it was irrelevant.
I mean, if she wanted to lie, she could have claimed a different date to get it in under the statute.
The verdict said rape, they just weren't sure if it was by finger or dick.
Stop with your lying.
She hasn't gotten it yet, but rump had to to put $90 million in bond in order to file the appeal.
When he loses, she gets the cash.
decided by the jury of his peers...
If you don't recognize this I guess we shouldn't recognize the bookkeepping verdict that convicted Trump then?
You realize that you are confirming my argument, don't you?decided by the jury of his peers...
If you don't recognize this I guess we shouldn't recognize the bookkeepping verdict that convicted Trump then?
[URL
Trump is a rapist and your court documents prove it.
Provide the link where it came from and I'll show you.
Incorrect, the verdict did NOT say "rape" (or rather, the only place it did was rejected) because of the way the legal definitions at play worked.
#1. What did you have in mind ?
#2 I hope they are gentle with you.
The verdict in the trial over Carroll calling trump a rapist did say that its legally correct to say that trump is a rapist.
That's the one I've been posting while rich goes back to the first trial.
Lol Johnny LaRue you jokes remind me of what Oscar Madison said during the poker game, " It's either very new cheese or very old meat".
