Was I supposed to be nice bc they are dumb, real question
TRUMP WINS
- Thread starter hungry
- Start date
JFK would be appalled at the choices the US electorate had this past week
no doubt he would not like Trump
but he would be crushed and completely ashamed by what his democratic party has become
the same goes for FDR & Truman
it really should be hitting home by now how messed up the loonie left has become if you get soundly rejected by the electorate in favour of a nasty mean-spirited vindictive prick like Donald trump
come on, think about it
the only way the democrats could lose was if the electorate was far more concerned about giving power to the unhinged democrats than to Donald trump
talk about hitting rock bottom
the left like to call themselves progressive
the only progress i see is in the wrong direction
sadly the loonie left is not undertaking the much needed self assessment
This is exactly the type of new citizens that is good for the country. It is a win-win. Bring more Elon Musks.
When we import from 3rd world and Islamist countries indiscriminately, without proper checking, and let them continue with their way of life here, that’s a totally different story. No thanks.
The government and policy change in the US will no doubt have a downstream effect on us here in Canada. I certainly hope the effect will eventually be positive.The “laugh in the face” type behaviour is a bit immature - sure but I don’t get those in Canada who think this is somehow “their” win too. Canada is not America. It was not our race. I just don’t get it. You will never see an America call another counties election a victory even if the person they felt was the better candidate won. It just boggles my mind. Seeing Trump or Harris signs in Canada too. I just don’t get it.
Last edited:
Relax with the insults, keyboard warrior. I didnt translate anything.
I did however make a typo with the original remark so let me clarify this: the US absolutely tried to kibosh China by NOT increasing their interest rates. Reasons?
The Chinese govt fought this like they thought Soros when he was buying up Hong Kong in 1998/1999. By pumping money and keeping all major companies/infrastructure in place rather than needing to sell foreign investment.
China has a huge stockpile of USD which is the most universal currency. So if the interest rate gets kiboshed, theyll just use USD directly. They also invested into a lot of foreign assets using USD to minimize impact since they know the US will use the same playbook if China is viewed as a threat. Since this dragged on for too long with an impending election at the time, the Dems had to do something get votes.
Federal interest rates-wise US is only country with major impact globally. Hence why the Dems were willing to screw over their constituent base in an attempt to kibosh China if it meant targeting a global competitor who isnt quite ready yet to go toe to toe with the US yet as taking care of the dogs is absolutely no problem.
The democrats have lost the plot I agree.
They are more concerned with virtue signalling than actually pursuing progressive policies.
But any past Republican, say Raegan would be equally appalled at what the Republicans have become.
The last Republican I actually respected was John McCain (RIP), even if I disagreed with him on policy.
and they don't seem to learn after much self reflection...still blaming "uneducated white women" "misogynystic black men" and "racist white men" oh and also Joe Biden for not withdrawing his candidacy early and endorsing Kamala is also part of the blame game...
Immigrants come from emigrant nations.
Emigrant nations are usually 3rd world nations.
It does not matter where immigrants come from.
We need to allow in properly qualified ones.
Example:
In the US, the Indian diaspora are considered model minorities. They are the highest income groups.
In Canada? Below average.
None of our processes are set up to identify successful people or enable them to be successful once they get here.
A qualified person is rejected because our institutions reject foreign credentials. The US does not do this.
Then our politicians allow tons of low wage workers via TFW.
Makes no sense.
In this way we are systemically disadvantaged.
I am nice when it suits my purpose. Often, that purpose is simply to be nice. Sometimes I do not have that purpose. Are you nice to people who are attacking you? I mean, a lot of you are choosing not to be nice to me right now. That is okay, but isn’t it a little silly to expect differently of anyone else?
Where is the empathy of which you speak?
All leftists know is hypocrisy, especially about the feelz
I was trying to depersonalize the characteristics simply for sake of discussion. I did say "NOT calling Miss Kitty one..." but I can see how you might be offended by the possible implication. Sorry, I didn't mean to.
It’s okay. I think you probably didn’t see the entire convo so maybe you didn’t get it.
I agree, except for the notion that it doesn’t matter where they come from.
If we bring highly qualified individuals that our society is lacking and they are accept our values and are willing to integrate, then it’s ok.
The added problem is when we import people from incompatible cultures (such as islamist). They may have a needed skill but be unwilling to integrate and wanting to spread the medieval cult they follow, so we must to be careful not only in terms of skills but also in terms of their compatibility with our society.
The international student loophole, and the low wage work permit program, and asylum seeker loopholes have been a disaster in terms of bringing a shitload of people that our country does not actually require.
But they are even a greater disaster because they come from incompatible cultures.
Last edited:
I see no issues with people following their culture or religion while also integrating.
It is inevitable they would bring some culture with them.
The issue is when they bring negative aspects of their culture and refuse to change them.
You’re conflating affective empathy with cognitive empathy. Were I to say more about it and legitimately explain why, you would say I was just “trying to win” and that I am showboating. You would dismiss the truth of what I say on those grounds, effectively silencing me for not being “nice” by your standards.
Do you not see the problem with this? Do you not see why that is downright tyrannical? Do you not see this is a feature of leftist thinking and why it is unfair and completely immoral? Give your head a shake.
Last edited:
jumping from one pile of steaming bullshit to a different pile of steaming bullshit does nothing to improve your credibility
US interest rate policy is strictly used to influence domestic price stability
it is controlled by the Federal reserve which is non political
no rational economist in the western world would ever state us interest rate policy was used to 'screw' over another country
besides
" US increased their interest rates in an attempt to screw over China this year, even at the expense of their own ppl."
doesn't appear grammatically correct by adding a "not" as if this was the typo you now claim
" not US increased their interest rates in an attempt to screw over China this year, even at the expense of their own ppl."
or
" US not increased their interest rates in an attempt to screw over China this year, even at the expense of their own ppl."
or
" US increased their interest rates not in an attempt to screw over China this year, even at the expense of their own ppl."
or
" US increased their interest rates in not an attempt to screw over China this year, even at the expense of their own ppl."
or
" US increased their interest rates in an attempt to screw over China not this year, even at the expense of their own ppl."
it just does not fit or make sense
the only place this statement makes any sense is if it is Chinese propaganda misinformation
so we are back to
there are only two possible reasons why you would state
" US increased their interest rates in an attempt to screw over China this year, even at the expense of their own ppl."
1. you have zero economic training and have not read any business news for 2 years and are stupid beyond belief
2. you cut and pasted translated Chinese propaganda and did not proof read your post
i do not believe you to be stupid beyond belief, but you tell us
which is it ?
It's disturbing. They've turned the loss into an identity politics grievance marathon.
They are spiteful propagandists.
Kamala lost because she was an absolutely terrible candidate running as Biden 2.0 when the Biden administration was already unpopular.
It doesn't get any simpler.
Last edited:
