Nice excuses for his refusal to accept the facts posed by Vassy!!I just watched this.
Shows you how requesting a meeting was a failure!
Nice excuses for his refusal to accept the facts posed by Vassy!!I just watched this.
Shows you how requesting a meeting was a failure!
I say the same thing.If India refused to co-operate from the word go, and the USA like Canada also accused India of their involvement in the attempted murder of their citizens, then what is "shabby" about the handling of this whole affair? Does not mean if they are a growing world power then they can get away with some Putinesqe style of assassinations of citizens that do not agree with!!
But even Pee Pee had condemned India's actions:
Was he acting "shabby" as well?
She kept asking the same questions.Nice excuses for his refusal to accept the facts posed by Vassy!!![]()
![]()
Last I heard, the US was actually prepared to charge some Indian diplomatic personnel.I say the same thing.
It is outrageous if India actually killed Nijjar.
The USA presented evidence, worked with India to form a committee to help their case and Matt Miller said that the US was satisfied with India's response.
Why isn't Trudeau able to replicate that?
Which is why I called it shabby.
That is what I say we should do instead of being wishy washy.Last I heard, the US was actually prepared to charge some Indian diplomatic personnel.
You are living in denial, when I posted the facts, that India that Expel these 6 diplomats, but the Indian Press that is closely scrutinized by the Modi Govt. obviously lied about it and stated that they were "recalling" these Diplomats.I watched the High Commissioners interview with Vassy.
I took away that we failed even with articulating an agenda for the meeting.
The high commissioner confirmed that India formed some committee to help with the American case.
So why do we not get the same treatment?
You are obsessed with Modi but it seems the issue is Trudeau being stupid.
Idk whether Canada expelled or India recalled.
What I know is that CTV texted the reporter in the middle of saying that India recalled its diplomats.
So, who do you believe this Verma individual or McKay? of course McKay is spot on when he stated that the Indian Govt. is working to vilify Canada just for their domestic audiences!!MacKay insists Canada, at multiple junctures, tried to share evidence with the Indian government.
“Frankly, Canada was seeking India’s cooperation and collaboration in this regard,” he told Kapelos. “We just haven’t seen it.”
“Instead, the Indian government, I think, for domestic political purposes, has responded by vilifying Canada, by dismissing evidence that we provided to them,” he said.
MacKay said the move appears to have worked for a domestic audience in India.
“That’s been a very successful domestic communications strategy for India,” he said. “Internationally, I don’t think it’s credible at all, but certainly it has worked for them within India.”
No, that's a question for the cons and PeePee.That is a question for Trudeau.
Aren't their Indian counterparts essentially the people being investigated?Copy pasting from the internet on the interview with the high commissioner on CTV.
2. Canadians have still not shared any evidence with their Indian counterparts.
Oddly enough, murder victims are usually not friendly with their murderers. You get this, right?3. Canadians keep going to anti-India/Canada elements. Keep collecting hearsay from Khalistanis and claim that this is evidence.
6. Some Khalistani extremists and terrorists are deep assets of CSIS.
They still can't come here and break out laws ffs!9. As far as trade is concerned, India will not stop trade and people-to-people relations completely. But the high commissioner did say, "There will be emotions on both sides which may impact a few of those deals." That is a message for Canada that yes, India will reduce trade if you push us beyond a point.
Let me know after you get over Modi and the Indian press.You are living in denial, when I posted the facts, that India that Expel these 6 diplomats, but the Indian Press that is closely scrutinized by the Modi Govt. obviously lied about it and stated that they were "recalling" these Diplomats.
India from the word go refused to co-operate with Canada. They know that they are complicit with the murder of Nijjar Singh. Otherwise, as McKay stated that Canada has always co-operated with India in their investigations in the past:
So, who do you believe this Verma individual or McKay? of course McKay is spot on when he stated that the Indian Govt. is working to vilify Canada just for their domestic audiences!!
They are diplomats and peers.Aren't their Indian counterparts essentially the people being investigated?
Does the TPS email murder suspects and tell them about the investigation?!?!!
Oddly enough, murder victims are usually not friendly with their murderers. You get this, right?
They still can't come here and break out laws ffs!
Wow, you are labelling Canada to be like a "terrorist" nation, if we are harbouring them. The fact is though I do not agree with them, is that these Sikhs are engaging in a free speech for the Separation of Punjab to create a separate Khalistan Nation. Does not make them to be "terrorists". Those real Khalistan terrorists in the past were either jailed or are dead. There is absolutely no evidence that Nijjar was involved with any acts of terrorism and was killed by what looks like the Indian Govt. involvement in it based on the RCMP evidence. Similar to the attempted murder of an activist in the USA. We have those espousing for Quebec's breakaway from Canada. Some of them were living in abroad. Does not mean that Canada carried out any acts to eliminate them, although there were dreadful terrorist acts in the past by these Separatists!!Copy pasting from the internet on the interview with the high commissioner on CTV.
1.RCMP is not independent as far as India is concerned.
2. Canadians have still not shared any evidence with their Indian counterparts.
3. Canadians keep going to anti-India/Canada elements. Keep collecting hearsay from Khalistanis and claim that this is evidence.
4. Trudeau is actively engaging in vote bank politics.
5. The west was used to bullying other nations. The so-called G 7 nations need to get used to the new reality that India will not bend over backwards.
6. Some Khalistani extremists and terrorists are deep assets of CSIS.
7. India will function on the principle of reciprocity.
8. Khalistani terrorists that intend to attack India are Canadian citizens, and Canada should not encourage them.
9. As far as trade is concerned, India will not stop trade and people-to-people relations completely. But the high commissioner did say, "There will be emotions on both sides which may impact a few of those deals." That is a message for Canada that yes, India will reduce trade if you push us beyond a point.
Can you clarify whether you are not Canadian?Question is why is Trudeau not able to get them to cooperate with us the way the US is able to?
My post is unclear?Can you clarify whether you are not Canadian?
They are alleging that we are harbouring elements that are actually participating in criminal activities for which evidence has been presented, but ignored by Canada for political reasons.Wow, you are labelling Canada to be like a "terrorist" nation, if we are harbouring them. The fact is though I do not agree with them, is that these Sikhs are engaging in a free speech for the Separation of Punjab to create a separate Khalistan Nation. Does not make them to be "terrorists". Those real Khalistan terrorists in the past were either jailed or are dead. There is absolutely no evidence that Nijjar was involved with any acts of terrorism and was killed by what looks like the Indian Govt. involvement in it based on the RCMP evidence. Similar to the attempted murder of an activist in the USA. We have those espousing for Quebec's breakaway from Canada. Some of them were living in abroad. Does not mean that Canada carried out any acts to eliminate them, although there were dreadful terrorist acts in the past by these Separatists!!
You are using the talking points of Modi and the Indian Press in this whole affair.Let me know after you get over Modi and the Indian press.
I care not for Modi or the Indian press.
CTV clearly texted the reporter on camera.
If India is not cooperating with Canada and vilifying us, but cooperating with the US, why is this?
Maybe Trudeau is stupid and should step down already?
The CTV reporter was instructed with pro-Trudeau talking points.You are using the talking points of Modi and the Indian Press in this whole affair.
If a reporter makes a mistake like all of us humans do, then they have every right to correct him.
But when the Indian Press are lying that Indian "Recalls" their Diplomats, that is only to try and vilify Canada and make The Indian Govt. innocent in this whole affair.
Now that Indian High Commissioner did not answer the question as to why he did not co-operate with Canada in this affair. He just made excuses. In the USA that involvement was someone much lower down the rung of the ladder. But when a High Commissioner is involved that is why he was making excuses and blaming Canada for not following the Protocols and claiming that the RCMP is politically involved with the Canadian Govt. This is in spite of Vassy refuting those claims.
You are the one that seems to be obsessed with Trudeau. Modi is the thug and is behaving like Putin in getting rid of individuals on a foreign soil. Even Jagmeet Singh was refused a visa.
Modi has a record of discriminating against not only Sikhs, but Muslims, Christians and Jews indirectly!!






