That is based on intel. If there is doubt I would assume they'd want to err on the side of caution.
Pee Pee Wants Israel to Strike Iran's Nuclear Facilities
- Thread starter bver_hunter
- Start date
What about them?
Israel has demonstrated over and over and over that they don't need nukes to defeat those countries. They've won every single war against those countries with simple using advanced conventional warfare and their superior intellect. This is so totally indisputable, as the history of the last 60 years has shown.
Israel has proven to be a rational and measured nuclear power. That would be, shall I say, overkill. Israel wins with the least amount of violence required. Nukes have not been necessary, so Israel has not used them.
At this point, how would you argue that Israel would ever err on the side of caution?
That's the premise Geno tries gaslighting us with. He sounds exactly like Big Brother. War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Have you heard of the book 1984?
I am talking about an attack on Iran by Israel.
Should they decide to attack Iran and if there is doubt about Iran's nuclear capability, they would factor that possibility into their strategy than ignore it altogether as Klatuu said.
None of which disproves my statement that Israel has had nuclear weapons for decades and has never used them once despite all the wars they've been forced to fight.
Thanks for reinforcing my point, Geno.
Just to add to my point, if Israel did indeed break these treaties, they then would truly be a pariah state and even the US would shun them.
That's a hell of a deterrence. Further proof that peace treaties are a deterrent.
Israel needed $20 billion in US bombs just to take on Hamas and Hezbollah.
$20 billion for this.
Every accusation is a confession.
Half the country thinks what you are promoting here is genocide.
318 (1) Every one who advocates or promotes genocide is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years.
Definition of genocide
(2) In this section, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy in whole or in part any identifiable group, namely,
(a) killing members of the group; or
(b) deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction
Are you willing to risk a WWIII based on the assumption that Israel does not have nuclear capability?
I'm asking the wrong person. Of course you would.
Every accusation is a confession.
Ceasefire.
End the genocide, illegal occupation and apartheid.
You mean the nuclear capability that you can’t provide evidence of?
POS Nation can’t even protect its jets from flooding.
F-16.net - The ultimate F-16, F-35 and F-22 reference
Eight F-16 jets were damaged last week as heavy rain flooded their under ground 'datak' hangars at Hatzor AB, the military acknowledged Sunday, following attempts to have the information censored initially.
www.f-16.net
I proofread every single one of my posts to make sure they convey that I say what I mean and I mean what I say.
That is unlike you who is in such a hurry to post your hateful rhetoric that I caught you posting things that like "Palestinians are lesser humans" and that "Phillipino nurses are bad for Ontario health care". You laughingly altered your post 6 months after the fact because you knew that you fucked up. I love toying with you, but your hate makes you vulnerable. It is a weakness, not a strength. BTW, you cannot deny how much hate you have. How many dozens of times have you told us how much you hate Zionists. You are consumed.
You need to be smarter, Geno. Take your own advice and read your own posts.
By damaging Iranian facilities and eliminating scientists working on the Iranian nuclear project, without causing any nuclear repercussions.
The proof is in the pudding. Iran is afraid of Israel.
And BTW that was a really naive if not totally stupid answer to Shaq.
