Zionists are always dehumanizing those they oppose.Amoeba.
Racial supremacists are all the same.
Zionists are always dehumanizing those they oppose.Amoeba.
Provide evidence that Israel has nuclear weapons. Fiction and overstatement comes naturally to POS Nation. Remember we are talking about a country that was humiliated and routed by 1500 Hamas members on Oct 7.What does that even mean? Iran doesn't even have nukes. Nor any other country in the region. Are you aware of that?
The comment/suggestion was that Israel doesn't use nukes only because they are so close geographically to their opponents. Iran is Israel's biggest threat and are a full 2,000 km away yet Israel has not used nukes. So that theory of proximity does not hold water.
Try and keep up, Geno. Your uncontrolled hatred is preventing you from thinking straight. Calm down.
Every accusation by a Ziontologist is a confessionAmoeba. You don't even know what you don't know.
Unlike you, I don't pretend to know everything and have enough confidence that I am not afraid to ask for clarification. That way I can have a proper and intelligent discussion. You should make sure you understand things before going on of your rambling tirades (that would be two words for someone of your intellect, as you've demonstrated) where you make a fool of yourself and are mocked almost as much as Geno. Try doing what normal people do.
trump loves the poorly educated. They are easily manipulated and are prone to hating things that they don't understand. They feel threatened because of their own ignorance.
Its well known they have had nuclear weapons since 1969 or so. At the very least they have the capacity to assemble one on short notice.Provide evidence that Israel has nuclear weapons. Fiction and overstatement comes naturally to POS Nation. Remember we are talking about a country that was humiliated and routed by 1500 Hamas members on Oct 7.
No, that's a pipedream and would not make a shred of difference to the radical muslims. The only thing that would satisfy them would be if Israel did not exist and there were zero Jews living there. As long as there are Jews they will attack.The best deterrence would be to end the occupation, invasions and genocide.
Perhaps you can provide the evidence then.Its well known they have had nuclear weapons since 1969 or so. At the very least they have the capacity to assemble one on short notice.
They maintain deliberate ambiguity. They have all the scientific knowledge, nuclear research facilities.Perhaps you can provide the evidence then.
Its also officially denied, just as they refuse to sign the NPT, a list including North Korea, Pakistan, India and South Sudan.Its well known they have had nuclear weapons since 1969 or so. At the very least they have the capacity to assemble one on short notice.
You don't read your own posts, do you?Your inability to have more than one or two catchphrases says a lot about your intellect. Try harder to actually say something original.
View attachment 367090
That’s not anything approaching proof.They maintain deliberate ambiguity. They have all the scientific knowledge, nuclear research facilities.
Nuclear weapons and Israel - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Your racism is getting out of control.No, that's a pipedream and would not make a shred of difference to the radical muslims. The only thing that would satisfy them would be if Israel did not exist and there were zero Jews living there. As long as there are Jews they will attack.
And even if there were no Jews, they'd attack Christians. Nothing except total world subjugation to Allah will satisfy them. And you think that Jews and Zionists are the colonialists. The Crusades occurred because the muslims attempted to conquer and take over Europe. They had to be driven out of Europe by the indigenous Europeans. They were fighting to retain the land that was rightfully theirs. History has shown that muslims are the ultimate colonialists/expansionists.
I know deliberate ambiguity. They have the capability and know how.Its also officially denied, just as they refuse to sign the NPT, a list including North Korea, Pakistan, India and South Sudan.
The evidence, is that even Iran is afraid to push Israel too far.Perhaps you can provide the evidence then.
And you know how they got it?I know deliberate ambiguity. They have the capability and know how.
If you are Iran would you strategize with the assumption that Israel has nukes or that they don't?That’s not anything approaching proof.
Iran, they are a NPT signatory that hasn't attacked another country in hundreds of years.The evidence, is that even Iran is afraid to push Israel too far.
Iran needs a nuclear deterrence, while Egypt and Jordan have treaties. Which do you think is smarter and more civilized?
That they don’t.If you are Iran would you strategize with the assumption that Israel has nukes or that they don't?
If you are Israel, do you risk the same with Iran?If you are Iran would you strategize with the assumption that Israel has nukes or that they don't?
Ok. That would be a mistake imo. But thanks for the straight answer.That they don’t.