But, I agree, she would definitely get airtime on any channel she wants to appear on. What I think you miss is this: She probably doesn't have to go on Fox, while Trump NEEDS to go on every channel. Look at it this way: Harris is probably not going to sway those already in the MAGA cult that Fox has helped cultivate. It doesn't matter what she says, or her vision for America. Nothing she says (or, apparently anything Trump does) will change their minds. In many ways, it is wasted effort.
This is something I feel people miss.
Candidates do interviews as messaging, not as public service.
The press can (and should!) push for them, that's their job.
But the candidates are going to - quite rightly - push back on how and where they want to do them.
There isn't some neutral, platonic ideal of reasoned journalistic discourse at play here.
That's why he needs to go on CNN and appear at things like the NABJ.
Trump went to the NABJ to get footage of him standing up to nasty, mean, liberal, Black women.
You might not be happy with the way the MSM is covering her or Trump, but that doesn't mean they are biased.
They
are biased.
It's just a mistake to think those biases are just simple ideology.
Harris is a bigger story now, because she's different. She has a different energy than Trump or Biden, and it's being reflected in the polls and energy. And, on the other hand, Trump is not campaigning as much, and when he makes appearances, he fucks the dog....like what happened at Arlington.
Trump will find a narrative the press can back soon enough, though.[/QUOTE][/QUOTE]