Trump loses 6% in the polls since his fake ear injury

Skoob

Well-known member
Jun 1, 2022
6,416
3,527
113
Totally different, skoob.
There was about policy, not about a criminal act.
There were no charges.

Trudeau, unlike rump, was not on trial personally for a criminal act.
How is it totally different?
A verdict came down and they were found guilty of violating that act.
You immediately brushed it off and said to wait for an appeal. i.e. you did not say they were guilty and put your hope in an appeal to overturn the ruling

Trump wasn't convicted of a criminal act in criminal court. It was civil court. Appeal in progress regardless.

Has nothing to do with the type of verdict or court.

So when a verdict comes down that you don't agree with you wait for the appeal but when others appeal you already have determined they're guilty?

Are you so blind that you can't see your own hypocrisy after I proved it to you once again?
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
90,587
21,793
113
You totally strayed from what I was saying and didn't even consider it before going down the "correlation implies causation" rabbit hole.
He didn't admit to any crime. It was locker room banter that all guys partake in.
Nobody I know would say they can rape people and get away with it because they are rich and famous.
Is your locker on Epstein's pedo island or something?
 

Skoob

Well-known member
Jun 1, 2022
6,416
3,527
113
Nobody I know would say they can rape people and get away with it because they are rich and famous.
Is your locker on Epstein's pedo island or something?
More distraction.
We were discussing the case and you went down the conspiracy rabbit hole with Epstein.
What's next, Hangar 18?

You automatically think someone in a photo with someone implies crime? Especially when it involves people who are often mingling with celebrities and politicians on a regular basis in those circles?
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
90,587
21,793
113
More distraction.
We were discussing the case and you went down the conspiracy rabbit hole with Epstein.
What's next, Hangar 18?

You automatically think someone in a photo with someone implies crime? Especially when it involves people who are often mingling with celebrities and politicians on a regular basis in those circles?
No, skoob, its not a distraction, its the point.
rump declared he could rape any woman he wanted and get away with it because he's rich and famous.
The courts fined him $83 million for doing exactly what he said he can get away with.

Why do you back a rapist?
Why do you want a convicted felon to lead the country?
 

Skoob

Well-known member
Jun 1, 2022
6,416
3,527
113
No, skoob, its not a distraction, its the point.
rump declared he could rape any woman he wanted and get away with it because he's rich and famous.
The courts fined him $83 million for doing exactly what he said he can get away with.

Why do you back a rapist?
Why do you want a convicted felon to lead the country?
We were discussing Carroll lying and rather than stick to that you dropped an Epstein conspiracy into it.
I know, tough questions to consider. No need to be evasive if you don't have answers just say you don't have answers.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
90,587
21,793
113
We were discussing Carroll lying and rather than stick to that you dropped an Epstein conspiracy into it.
I know, tough questions to consider. No need to be evasive if you don't have answers just say you don't have answers.
The judge and jury thought it was rump lying, not Carroll.
Why do you think you know better?
 

Skoob

Well-known member
Jun 1, 2022
6,416
3,527
113
The judge and jury thought it was rump lying, not Carroll.
Why do you think you know better?
Really?...so why didn't the jury select rape on their verdict form?

Oh I know...because they didn't buy her bullshit.
 

Skoob

Well-known member
Jun 1, 2022
6,416
3,527
113
Come on, you know Skoob is all-knowing and is never wrong.
You may want to confirm with Failfooter how many times I've proved him wrong in the past couple of weeks and that he's even acknowledged.
I would say I'm batting 1000 here wouldn't you?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: squeezer

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
90,587
21,793
113
Really?...so why didn't the jury select rape on their verdict form?

Oh I know...because they didn't buy her bullshit.
No, because the jury believed her when she said she was penetrated by your rapist hero but they didn't have enough evidence to say if it was his tiny fingers or mushroom shaped dick.

Why do you want a rapist and convicted felon to run things, skoob?
 
  • Like
Reactions: squeezer

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
90,587
21,793
113
You may want to confirm with Failfooter how many times I've proved him wrong in the past couple of weeks and that he's even acknowledged.
I would say I'm batting 1000 here wouldn't you?
You have failed to prove that rump isn't a rapist, failed to show he isn't a convicted felon, failed to prove you support democracy, failed economics, failed human rights and proven only that you back rape, felons, fraud, apartheid and genocide.

Yes, you are doing very well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: squeezer

Skoob

Well-known member
Jun 1, 2022
6,416
3,527
113
No, because the jury believed her when she said she was penetrated by your rapist hero but they didn't have enough evidence to say if it was his tiny fingers or mushroom shaped dick.

Why do you want a rapist and convicted felon to run things, skoob?
"they didn't have enough evidence"

She lied.

Thanks
 

Skoob

Well-known member
Jun 1, 2022
6,416
3,527
113
You have failed to prove that rump isn't a rapist, failed to show he isn't a convicted felon, failed to prove you support democracy, failed economics, failed human rights and proven only that you back rape, felons, fraud, apartheid and genocide.

Yes, you are doing very well.
Difference is, I proved you failed with proof.

The best you can do is spew subjective opinion.

I don't lie like you do.
I don't spread misinformation like you do.
I don't put words in other people's mouths like you do.
I don't share fake info like you do.

All of the above has been proven.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
90,587
21,793
113
Difference is, I proved you failed with proof.

The best you can do is spew subjective opinion.

I don't lie like you do.
I don't spread misinformation like you do.
I don't put words in other people's mouths like you do.
I don't share fake info like you do.

All of the above has been proven.
Wrong again.
I made a mistake and corrected it.

You intentionally lie repeatedly.
Like claiming that Carroll lied with zero evidence, you know its a lie but you keep repeating it.
Like knowing rump is an adjudicated rapist and its legally correct to call him a rapist yet you keep lying about what the judge and jury said.
 

Skoob

Well-known member
Jun 1, 2022
6,416
3,527
113
Lying about Carroll like that cost rump millions, skoob.
Its amazing you can keep repeating stuff that is so blatantly false.
They didn't have enough evidence and she couldn't convince them otherwise.
That's the only argument that's required here.
 

Skoob

Well-known member
Jun 1, 2022
6,416
3,527
113
Wrong again.
I made a mistake and corrected it.

You intentionally lie repeatedly.
Like claiming that Carroll lied with zero evidence, you know its a lie but you keep repeating it.
Like knowing rump is an adjudicated rapist and its legally correct to call him a rapist yet you keep lying about what the judge and jury said.
That's funny!
Not a week goes by where you don't lie and then need to be called out. Just because ever lie to peddle isn't called out doesn't mean it's actually the truth. It means people get tired of having to constantly call you out and prove it to you like I did.

If Carroll had evidence, the jury would have checked rape on their report. They didn't.
I'm willing to bet that at some point in the future she will be caught admitting that she made the whole thing up.
 
Toronto Escorts