should trump drop out after the NABJ interview

[Skoob]

The judge says he committed rape.
So why do you back rapists?

That was his opinion not part of the liability findings for the plaintiff. You are desperate.
Why are you making up shit about the jury's conclusions? You must be desperate indeed.

btw Maybe if the judge and prosecutor weren't work chums he wouldn't have been so biased. Funny how that works eh?

 

[Skoob]

Is that like supporting a rapist or felon?
Why do you think that's not hypocritical?
How about posts supporting apartheid or genocide?

Not quite. It's more like everything you post. Considering you fell on your face posting fake news you should be more humble and repentant.
Look inward.

 

[Frankfooter]

That was his opinion not part of the liability findings for the plaintiff. You are desperate.
Why are you making up shit about the jury's conclusions? You must be desperate indeed.

btw Maybe if the judge and prosecutor weren't work chums he wouldn't have been so biased. Funny how that works eh?

Skoob, what you posted was an opinion.
What the judges said were rulings.

In other words, you don't support and accept verdicts when they don't jive with your narrative.
Sounds like the only sore loser here is you sunshine.

 

[Frankfooter]

Not quite. It's more like everything you post. Considering you fell on your face posting fake news you should be more humble and repentant.
Look inward.

Dunning Kruger.

 

[Skoob]

Skoob, what you posted was an opinion.
What the judges said were rulings.

There were no rulings that Trump raped Carroll.
But if it makes you feel better living in an alternate reality go for it.

 

[Skoob]

Dunning Kruger.

Says the guy who needs to peddle fake information to try and convince others that he knows what he's talking about.

 

[richaceg]

Skoob, what you posted was an opinion.
What the judges said were rulings.

you always have sources...it's easy to show the "rulings" if you have one...

 

[silentkisser]

Simply sharing something from sources is different than sharing something from sources to add to your argument and being proven wrong due to fake info.

For example, if you just share a post you found that is funny, fake, satirical, interesting, etc that's fine. You are simply resharing what was already shared.

But if we're debating a topic, and then you add a post to backup your narrative which is then proven to be fake, that's different...it's deceptive.

Just like someone saying they are not homophobic, then using posts from known homophobes to back up their argument. That's more hypocritical than sharing fake info.

Are you saying I'm doing that? I've lost the thread here about what you're trying to say....

 

[Valcazar]

you always have sources...it's easy to show the "rulings" if you have one...

Just to be clear, are you and Skoob asking for the court ruling saying it is legally correct to say that Trump raped Carroll?

That would be this one.

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.543790/gov.uscourts.nysd.543790.200.0.pdf

 

[Frankfooter]

There were no rulings that Trump raped Carroll.
But if it makes you feel better living in an alternate reality go for it.

A judge ruled that rump raped Carroll and another judge ruled that it is legally correct to say rump is a rapist.

 

[Skoob]

A judge ruled that rump raped Carroll and another judge ruled that it is legally correct to say rump is a rapist.

Nope.
There were no ruling by the judge or jury that he committed rape.
Getting a judges opinion after the fact is meaningless.

btw don't you think it's neat how the judge and prosecutor were work buddies in the past and he was a mentor to her? Kinda cool for a mentor to see their junior win a case eh? He must be so proud!

 

[Skoob]

A judge ruled that rump raped Carroll and another judge ruled that it is legally correct to say rump is a rapist.

Maybe in your own mind.
Just keep it in there so you don't get caught spreading misinformation again.

 

[Frankfooter]

Nope.
There were no ruling by the judge or jury that he committed rape.
Getting a judges opinion after the fact is meaningless.

btw don't you think it's neat how the judge and prosecutor were work buddies in the past and he was a mentor to her? Kinda cool for a mentor to see their junior win a case eh? He must be so proud!

It was posted earlier in the thread, the first judge said 'rape'.
You keep posting the same debunked nonsense.

Maybe in your own mind.
Just keep it in there so you don't get caught spreading misinformation again.

You keep posting the same debunked nonsense.
You admitted rump is guilty of sexual assault but won't admit that means he's a rapist.

Why would you want to put a rapist in charge of the country?

 

[Skoob]

It was posted earlier in the thread, the first judge said 'rape'.
You keep posting the same debunked nonsense.



You keep posting the same debunked nonsense.
You admitted rump is guilty of sexual assault but won't admit that means he's a rapist.

Why would you want to put a rapist in charge of the country?

What "debunked" nonsense? I posted the same jury report that all mainstream media shared.

Everyone knows the case was a sham and the allegations were false. If it was anyone else other than Trump it would have been thrown out. The public doesn't buy it especially after Carroll started bragging about spending her money. She played everyone.

btw Interesting to see how Kaplan rewarded the prosecutor, his former co-worker and mentee. Funny how that worked eh?

 

[richaceg]

Just to be clear, are you and Skoob asking for the court ruling saying it is legally correct to say that Trump raped Carroll?

That would be this one.

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.543790/gov.uscourts.nysd.543790.200.0.pdf

 

[Frankfooter]

Everyone knows the case was a sham and the allegations were false.

What did you say before?

In other words, you don't support and accept verdicts when they don't jive with your narrative.
Sounds like the only sore loser here is you sunshine.

 

[Skoob]

What did you say before?

There was no "verdict" that he raped someone. You're desperate.

 

[Frankfooter]

There was no "verdict" that he raped someone. You're desperate.

rump is an adjudicated rapist.
You're doing the pretzel twist to hide the fact that you think its cool he's a rapist.

 

[Skoob]

rump is an adjudicated rapist.
You're doing the pretzel twist to hide the fact that you think its cool he's a rapist.

How could I be doing a twist if there was never a conviction for rape?
You are desperate.

I miss when you would just use homophobes as your moral compass and fall on your face for posting fake Xitter info.
Can we go back to that?

 

[Frankfooter]

How could I be doing a twist if there was never a conviction for rape?
You are desperate.

When a judge says rump raped Carroll and has to pay $85 million for slandering his rape victim you just cheer it on.
You really do love rapists, don't you?
Why do you want a rapist to lead the country?
Do you think he's going to change the laws to let you rape too?