Not remotely.
How do you get that from what I just said?
And therefore the interference went exactly as you have imagined it, in accordance with the "It is real if Butler wants it to be" principle, yes.
Go on.
At least you admit you don't have any actual details or evidence right now.
I love it!
That makes it completely un-falsifiable since any contradiction is just her faulty memory.
That's a good one!
You need to keep that in your repertoire for future events.
How, pray tell, am I implying that?
I suppose it would help if you would clarify what you think "it" is in this context.
Your newfound admiration for Nancy Pelosi - secret unchallenged mastermind of the Democratic party - is inspirational.
LOL