SCREAMS BEFORE SILENCE

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
93,215
23,148
113
It was a stupid choice by the Palis. They had more than enough land for their own use. They were offered more land than the Israelis. Instead those war and continue to do so. And once again, if the UK reneged on the deal, that is not Israel's fault.

More and more of their people die, more and more land is lost to Israel, more and more the anti-Semites whine. All of the Palis actions have had consequences.

Your arguments are without merit. They are no more than the talk of losers.
I'm sure you're willing to give up 60% of your home to Palestinian refugees, you have more than you need now that you're stuck with the walker.
Shall we send your info to immigration so they can pick suitable new landlords for you?

 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
93,215
23,148
113

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
52,204
10,489
113
Toronto
I'm sure you're willing to give up 60% of your home to Palestinian refugees, you have more than you need now that you're stuck with the walker.
Shall we send your info to immigration so they can pick suitable new landlords for you?
Considering what they have now, it was a good deal.

Tom Hagen : When a plot against the Emperor failed... the plotters were always given a chance... to let their families keep their fortunes. Right?

Frank Pentangeli : Yeah, but only the rich guys, Tom. The little guys got knocked off and all their estates went to the Emperors. Unless they went home and killed themselves, then nothing happened. And the families... the families were taken care of.

Tom Hagen : That was a good break. A nice deal.

Hamas is only giving bad deals to the Gazans. Die by being human shields or die by letting letting us withhold your food.
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
52,204
10,489
113
Toronto
How was it a good deal letting the people who are still stealing land and committing genocide to do it, come in?
Ask your buddy, Kaut. After I said that the Arabs should have taken the deal, he just said that hindsight is 20:20.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
93,215
23,148
113

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,971
6,853
113
You are such a shitty hasbara troll.
Your quote says both sides are supposed to implement the ceaefire.
...
Problem with your logic is Hamas rejected it. Just another case where you think it okay to completely ignore what Palestinians say.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,971
6,853
113
I am not ignoring what they want. You are ignoring what they want. You are quoting a poll,
Yes, a poll of Palestinians with similar results to Palestinian polling for more than a decade. They have been clear that their goal is a Palestinian only state. Every time you say otherwise, you just expose yourself as an elitist clown.


And here's the moronic fake history
They DID NOT immigrate to Mandatory Palestine. You use immigrate and settlers in the same sentence. You are either an immigrant or a settler. They SETTLED in Mandatory Palestine. So yes, your comparison of immigration to Canada and established state, to that of settlement in Mandator Palestine is patently ridiculous.

The valid comparison here would be to compare settlement in Canada to settlement in Mandatory Palestine. You'd see similar atrocities etc.,
Bullshit. Pre-European colonization, there was not authority overseeing Canada. Europeans colonized the place. The Ottomans and later the Brits did have government and administration with rules for immigration. All you are doing is showing your elitist thinking Ottomans were incapable of running their own empire




The Jews who lived there along with the Palestinians, sure. Eastern Europeans who have no connection to the land claiming it is their ancestral homeland and colonizing the land, were not entitled to be there. That is the same as me, an Indian, and a Roman Catholic claiming
Yes, according to your ridiculous double standard, you as a Catholic and an Indian have absolutely no legitimacy in being in Canada.

Your arguments are simply incoherent ramblings, trying to justify your actions while demonizing people who did the same thing (while ignoring that around half of Israeli jews are Arabs..
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
52,204
10,489
113
Toronto
The deal should never have been offered in the first place.
Palestine should have stayed as a pluralistic state and not been given away to foreign terrorists.
But the deal was offered and done so by the powers that be at that time.

So, basically you both agree that the Palis were stupid to turn down the deal. They were offered land with which they could have that pluralistic state or any other kind of state. Instead they walk away with nothing and become eternal refugees. That's a perfect example of biting off your nose to spite your face. They should have taken the deal.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
93,215
23,148
113
But the deal was offered and done so by the powers that be at that time.

So, basically you both agree that the Palis were stupid to turn down the deal. They were offered land with which they could have that pluralistic state or any other kind of state. Instead they walk away with nothing and become eternal refugees. That's a perfect example of biting off your nose to spite your face. They should have taken the deal.
No, the Brits were wrong to offer the deal. They backstabbed the Palestinians after their support in WWII.

zionism = genocide
Do you think that was smart?
Do you think being on the same moral level as nazis is a smart move, Shazi?

 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
93,215
23,148
113
Problem with your logic is Hamas rejected it. Just another case where you think it okay to completely ignore what Palestinians say.
No, Hamas accepted it and Netanyahu refused.
Netanyahu says he won’t agree to a deal that ends the war in Gaza, testing the latest truce proposal

That is a crappy, lie, basketcase.
Is that seriously the best a hasbara troll can come up with to defend the genocide you've been waiting for?

 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
52,204
10,489
113
Toronto
No, the Brits were wrong to offer the deal. They backstabbed the Palestinians after their support in WWII.
Regardless the deal WAS offered and the Arabs had to make a choice. They said "no" to the land offered, chose war and have had no homeland since. They chose to be eternal refugees that only seem to be able to always pick violence.

They bit off their nose to spite their face. They were stupid then and they were stupid on Oct.7.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
93,215
23,148
113
Regardless the deal WAS offered and the Arabs had to make a choice. They said "no" to the land offered, chose war and have had no homeland since. They chose to be eternal refugees that only seem to be able to always pick violence.

They bit off their nose to spite their face. They were stupid then and they were stupid on Oct.7.
The original zionists were terrorists, Shazi.
You keep arguing you can't make deal with terrorists.

Regardless, its time to end zionism altogether.

Zionism = genocide.

 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
52,204
10,489
113
Toronto
The original zionists were terrorists, Shazi.
We are talking about the deal that was offered in 1948 by the UK and the choice that the Arabs were offered.

The Arabs had to make a choice. Don't deflect. The Arabs chose violence over land. That is the reality of that time.

They chose violence over land. They screwed their people into becoming refugees with no land of their own.
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
52,204
10,489
113
Toronto
The deal where the Brits gave away land owned by Palestinians?
So you agree that there was a deal offered. If they'd have accepted it, they wouldn't be refugees now. It's a very basic concept that cannot be refuted. They had a choice to accept that land, but they chose war.
 
Toronto Escorts