Yet the possibility of Biden losing over aiding genocide might pressure him to stop before the election.
You have already said that he still couldn't be supported even if that happened.
Also that it would have stopped on its own because you don't expect it to continue.
Also that everything will be exactly the same under Trump so in fact none of this has any effect at all no matter what.
Are you going to pick one of these theories at some point?
This is about the long game, letting rump win will force change in the dems.
Ahh, we are going to stick to this theory, then?
You still think "The pro-Israel side winning the election will teach the opposing party that they should be less pro-Israel"?
Have you...
looked at US electoral history?
So to answer this.
1) I don't see any reason to believe your theory of cause and effect should be true.
2) I see even less reason to inflict suffering on people short term in order to get your preferred long-term result.
I do understand that "Look, you can't make an omelette without breaking some eggs" is a thing some people believe and even embrace.
But doubling down on that on the hope - unsupported by evidence - that it will be worth it in the end isn't really my jam.
This is Biden's last election and watching the AIPAC/Bowman fight is a preview of how that money will look during November.
Interesting.
So how is it going to look, extrapolating from what you are seeing in that fight?
Zionism as a movement must be ended, the leaders taken to court and the occupation ended. That won't happen ever under Biden. He needs to go.
Even if he stops the war, which you think he can stop?
He just needs to go, no matter what?
We're back to "Biden must me made an example of and punished" I see?
Your sole argument is that you think rump might be worse for the genocide.
its a genocide, it really can't get much worse.
It isn't my sole argument.
Are you even reading?
Long term it may change that policy. In 2028 its a different discussion.
No, repeatedly voting third party in tiny amounts
isn't going to change policy, even long term.
You would need impressive numbers.
But even then, you have a serious problem in that you have NOT ONCE proposed what people should do instead.
If they stay home, no one knows why and so they don't get counted.
If they vote for RFK - he is more pro-Israel than Biden and possibly even than Trump.
If they vote Stein in massive numbers, maybe you get a signal.
Or maybe voting West.
But if the idea was to make a serious statement, there would be a coordinated effort to rally behind a pro-Palestinian candidate with it being clear that is why they are getting that support.
Outside of one poll in one state that hasn't been repeated, we haven't seen that and their certainly hasn't been any such attempt to create a coordinated message.
Hell, you - in all your "But We ARE CHANGING THE SYSTEM" hasn't even thought to bring it up.
Trump couldn't enact a Muslim ban and won't be able to enact this, even if its still going on in Nov.
He's senile and more worried about pardoning himself, a nice piece of chocolate cake and cheating at golf.
Ahh, we are back to "It's all right because nothing bad will happen because Trump is incompetent".
While I think this is ludicrous wishcasting, at least it is better than "No, everyone SHOULD suffer if they don't agree with me".
This is just "If I wish and pray really hard, I won't have to feel bad about what I helped cause happen! (even if I think it is ok because my hands would be clean because I don't understand voting systems)"
You think he'll be worse than this?
Are you under the impression these are Federal police and that the US Government is deporting them?
blogs.timesofisrael.com
m.jpost.com
