Israel at war

[shack]

How do past acts justify killing 15,000 children?
How do past acts justify starving 1 million people to death?

That's a laugh, Geno. How many times have you attempted to justify Oct.7, with your baseless claims of a 76 year old occupation. Oct. 7 was the event that set off Israel's strong response which resulted in the deaths and suffering of Gazans. Hamas initiated their campaign of incestuous genocide and you support them. You are not allowed to cry about the outcome. Everybody knew this would be Israel's response.

Do you think that Oct.7 was a smart tactic? (All I hear is crickets every time I ask. Geno, there is no right or wrong answer. Just your opinion.)

 

[shack]

No, correcting your lies is not lying, grandpa.

Lies and insults from you. And whatever insults you sling my way does not change that you are a racist.

 

[shack]

There is enough video and photos to keep the ICJ and ICC busy for decades, grandpa.

Thanks for agreeing and admitting that that pic is not current and not from the current conflict.

 

[shack]

What is this a confession of, grandpa?

That is the rallying cry of you and Amoeba. Why wouldn't you understand what it means?

Is that the same as Amoeba not knowing what a Ziontologist is? You guys use words and phrases that you don't understand yourselves.

 

[Kautilya]

Israel has a fascism problem. Kinda explains the treatment of Ethiopian Jews.

 

[shack]

Thanks for admitting Israel targets children and civilians at large and has always done so.

There is no logic in saying that if I'm calling that a fake picture it is an admission of anything. Just another non-sequitur from you.

Nope it is you that is projecting. He said we will eliminate everything. That is not interpretation. That is the literal translation.

But then you said it means there would not be a single person remaining. He did not use those exact words. That is the interpretation. You used words that he didn't. That is the definition of interpretation. How can you not understand that?

Show me the exact words of "not a single person" and I'll retract my statement.

 

[Kautilya]

There is no logic in saying that if I'm calling that a fake picture it is an admission of anything. Just another non-sequitur from you.

The picture was about a child amputee. You made the comment that she was at a hospital. I responded saying it does not look like a hospital for very obvious reasons. There was no mention or discussion of the pic being fake. So this is an outright lie.

But then you said it means there would not be a single person remaining. He did not use those exact words. That is the interpretation. You used words that he didn't. That is the definition of interpretation. How can you not understand that?

Show me the exact words of "not a single person" and I'll retract my statement.

Everything is all encompassing. That is the literal meaning of everything. In fact it means more than "not a single person". So again, it is not interpretation. It is just the literal meaning of the sentence.

 

[shack]

He could have said eliminate Hamas but given Israel considers that there are no non combatants in Gaza, he chose to say eliminate everything.

So he's going to eliminate all air and water and sand? Those would be included in "everything".

 

[Klatuu]

That's a laugh, Geno. How many times have you attempted to justify Oct.7, with your baseless claims of a 76 year old occupation. Oct. 7 was the event that set off Israel's strong response which resulted in the deaths and suffering of Gazans. Hamas initiated their campaign of incestuous genocide and you support them. You are not allowed to cry about the outcome. Everybody knew this would be Israel's response.

Do you think that Oct.7 was a smart tactic? (All I hear is crickets every time I ask. Geno, there is no right or wrong answer. Just your opinion.)

Delusional

 

[Kautilya]

So he's going to eliminate all air and water and sand? Those would be included in "everything".

May be. He for sure turned off all water, food, electricity and fuel. Destroyed all buildings and razed the place to the ground. And committing an ongoing genocide as we speak.

 

[Klatuu]

So he's going to eliminate all air and water and sand? Those would be included in "everything".

Amateurish deflection

 

[Klatuu]

That's a laugh, Geno. How many times have you attempted to justify Oct.7, with your baseless claims of a 76 year old occupation. Oct. 7 was the event that set off Israel's strong response which resulted in the deaths and suffering of Gazans. Hamas initiated their campaign of incestuous genocide and you support them. You are not allowed to cry about the outcome. Everybody knew this would be Israel's response.

Do you think that Oct.7 was a smart tactic? (All I hear is crickets every time I ask. Geno, there is no right or wrong answer. Just your opinion.)

Wife beater defence

 

[shack]

He literally said those sentences. Those were his words. He uttered those 3 sentences. Case closed.

I am interpreting nothing. I am repeating translation of 3 sentences that literally came out of his mouth, word for word.

we do have the entirety of the relevant sentences anyway.

But the clip was edited, so he must have said other things. What were the statements that were edited out? Do you know? How does any body know if his other statements were relevant or not?

 

[Kautilya]

But the clip was edited, so he must have said other things. What were the statements that were edited out? Do you know? How does any body know if his other statements were relevant or not?

Maybe the other things he said are relevant in how they were going to carry out the genocide. But those 3 sentences were continuous one after the other proving genocidal intent.

 

[shack]

Stupidity is a key ingredient in ziontology

Stupidity would be using a word that you have no definition for.

What is Ziontology?
What is a Ziontologist?

I'm waiting to hear any non-stupid replies.

 

[The Oracle]

Wife beater defence

I've only seen one other poster on here use that terminology....Illuminating.

 

[shack]

That is the literal meaning of everything. In fact it means more than "not a single person". So again, it is not interpretation. It is just the literal meaning of the sentence.

That is exactly the definition of an interpretation.

Somebody uses certain words and you have to tell us what those words means is what interpretation means.

Dictionary
Definitions from Oxford Languages · Learn more

in·ter·pre·ta·tion
/inˌtərprəˈtāSHən/
noun

1. the action of explaining the meaning of something.

Go argue with Oxford. What you said you were doing is what Oxford says is interpreting.

 

[Kautilya]

That is exactly the definition of an interpretation.

Somebody uses certain words and you have to tell us what those words means is what interpretation means.

Dictionary
Definitions from Oxford Languages · Learn more

in·ter·pre·ta·tion
/inˌtərprəˈtāSHən/
noun

1. the action of explaining the meaning of something.

There is no need to explain anything. That is what am telling you. The sentence and its meaning stands on its own. You are the one trying to interpret it..

 

[Klatuu]

Zionist Taliban

Duly noted by the ICJ and ICC

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1799962402114724279

 

[Butler1000]

That is exactly the definition of an interpretation.

Somebody uses certain words and you have to tell us what those words means is what interpretation means.

Dictionary
Definitions from Oxford Languages · Learn more

in·ter·pre·ta·tion
/inˌtərprəˈtāSHən/
noun

1. the action of explaining the meaning of something.

Go argue with Oxford. What you said you were doing is what Oxford says is interpreting.

They like to make up their own definitions now.