Israel at war
- Thread starter Butler1000
- Start date
But the clip was edited, so he must have said other things. What were the statements that were edited out? Do you know? How does any body know if his other statements were relevant or not?
Stupidity would be using a word that you have no definition for.
What is Ziontology?
What is a Ziontologist?
I'm waiting to hear any non-stupid replies.
That is exactly the definition of an interpretation.
Somebody uses certain words and you have to tell us what those words means is what interpretation means.
Dictionary
Definitions from Oxford Languages · Learn more
in·ter·pre·ta·tion
/inˌtərprəˈtāSHən/
noun
- the action of explaining the meaning of something.
Last edited:
This will give you an idea of the depth of racism in POS Nation
How will this whole situation end?
On both side as soon as member of your family is killed you devote your life for revenge. Its not like if your kid is killed in a daily mass shooting by a mentally disturbed who was able to buy as many gun as he wanted.
No the hate is real. The hate is infiltrated in these people on both side. A few years ago i remember hearing a palestinien mother say that now that her 2 sons were killed she would have to birth 2 more to continue the fight...
Where will it end?
On both side as soon as member of your family is killed you devote your life for revenge. Its not like if your kid is killed in a daily mass shooting by a mentally disturbed who was able to buy as many gun as he wanted.
No the hate is real. The hate is infiltrated in these people on both side. A few years ago i remember hearing a palestinien mother say that now that her 2 sons were killed she would have to birth 2 more to continue the fight...
Where will it end?
One thing you'll notice after the Israeli raid that rescued four hostages is how deep the divide is on this. Many people are happy with the rescue. Then there are the voices who describe it as a "release" of four hostages and focus primarily on the claims that many people were killed in the operation
Most of those who condemn the operation put up talking points such as "200 killed to release 4". These commentators NEVER condemn the taking of hostages in the first place, and they NEVER condemn Hamas for unlawfully keeping hostages in civilian areas
What's clear here is just how totally captured these commentators are by the extremist pro-Hamas mentality. Notice how after the operation, knowing that Hamas is hiding hostages in densely populated civilian areas, they NEVER call on Hamas to free hostages and stop this.
Even when they find out that people like journalists and doctors are being brought into the Hamas crimes by keeping hostages in their homes, there is never a Road to Damascus moment here, where these people say "oh this is a red line, how dare Hamas do this."
I'll admit over the years to supporting many causes. But there has to be a red line in any cause. Why did supporting Palestinians become an excuse for every Hamas crime imaginable? A normal person would be shocked to find out hostges were held by civilians.
The number of civilians already implicated in the crimes of Oct. 7 and kidnapping and holding hostages is already a large number. This illustrates a radicalized society. We need to ask tough questions about this.
If human rights groups were doing their job, they'd ask tough questions about how Hamas was able to get civilians to hold hostages, including journalists and medical personnel. This endangers these people obviously.
Instead what happens is that all the Hamas men who dress as civilians are described as civilians when they are killed and all these other civilians who take part in hostage taking are all described as civilian professionals when they also end up killed in this war.
The whole process is directed toward trying to "civilianize" Hamas completely, such that, with the exception of Oct. 7, everyone in Gaza is portrayed as a civilian.
If Hamas and the pro-Palestinian crowd had been held to an equal standard many years ago this wouldn't have happened. Hamas was given excuses and empowered to create a criminal terrorist empire in Gaza in which everything is hijacked to help Hamas.
As Hamas hijacked every aspect of civilian society in Gaza, the int'l community was there beside it to whitewash its conquest of that society, and always turn Hamas into "armed groups" and never condemn or mention them.
This is why when Hamas members turn up at hospitals or UN facilities...it's never a shock to the managers of the facility...in fact they always welcome Hamas. When Hamas places hostages in civilian homes, there is never condern or shock.
You can tell how much the int'l community is connected to Hamas by looking at statements after the June 8 raid in Nuseirat. Has even one organization called on civilians in Gaza to stop holding hostages? Has even one? No.
The excuses for Hamas crimes aren't helping Palestinians. Obviously Hamas crimes have always been a setback for two states. Hamas only exists in order to sabotage peace and two states and to create endless war.
If the int'l community had been responsible it would have isolated Hamas and made it clear that its crimes are unacceptable and it would have supported peace and moderate groups; instead of excusing how Hamas radicalized Gaza and took over civilian institutions to exploit them.
x.com
Most of those who condemn the operation put up talking points such as "200 killed to release 4". These commentators NEVER condemn the taking of hostages in the first place, and they NEVER condemn Hamas for unlawfully keeping hostages in civilian areas
What's clear here is just how totally captured these commentators are by the extremist pro-Hamas mentality. Notice how after the operation, knowing that Hamas is hiding hostages in densely populated civilian areas, they NEVER call on Hamas to free hostages and stop this.
Even when they find out that people like journalists and doctors are being brought into the Hamas crimes by keeping hostages in their homes, there is never a Road to Damascus moment here, where these people say "oh this is a red line, how dare Hamas do this."
I'll admit over the years to supporting many causes. But there has to be a red line in any cause. Why did supporting Palestinians become an excuse for every Hamas crime imaginable? A normal person would be shocked to find out hostges were held by civilians.
The number of civilians already implicated in the crimes of Oct. 7 and kidnapping and holding hostages is already a large number. This illustrates a radicalized society. We need to ask tough questions about this.
If human rights groups were doing their job, they'd ask tough questions about how Hamas was able to get civilians to hold hostages, including journalists and medical personnel. This endangers these people obviously.
Instead what happens is that all the Hamas men who dress as civilians are described as civilians when they are killed and all these other civilians who take part in hostage taking are all described as civilian professionals when they also end up killed in this war.
The whole process is directed toward trying to "civilianize" Hamas completely, such that, with the exception of Oct. 7, everyone in Gaza is portrayed as a civilian.
If Hamas and the pro-Palestinian crowd had been held to an equal standard many years ago this wouldn't have happened. Hamas was given excuses and empowered to create a criminal terrorist empire in Gaza in which everything is hijacked to help Hamas.
As Hamas hijacked every aspect of civilian society in Gaza, the int'l community was there beside it to whitewash its conquest of that society, and always turn Hamas into "armed groups" and never condemn or mention them.
This is why when Hamas members turn up at hospitals or UN facilities...it's never a shock to the managers of the facility...in fact they always welcome Hamas. When Hamas places hostages in civilian homes, there is never condern or shock.
You can tell how much the int'l community is connected to Hamas by looking at statements after the June 8 raid in Nuseirat. Has even one organization called on civilians in Gaza to stop holding hostages? Has even one? No.
The excuses for Hamas crimes aren't helping Palestinians. Obviously Hamas crimes have always been a setback for two states. Hamas only exists in order to sabotage peace and two states and to create endless war.
If the int'l community had been responsible it would have isolated Hamas and made it clear that its crimes are unacceptable and it would have supported peace and moderate groups; instead of excusing how Hamas radicalized Gaza and took over civilian institutions to exploit them.
x.com
x.com
Brainwashed. Plus the usual manipulative and oily thumb sucking so common among ZiontologistsOne thing you'll notice after the Israeli raid that rescued four hostages is how deep the divide is on this. Many people are happy with the rescue. Then there are the voices who describe it as a "release" of four hostages and focus primarily on the claims that many people were killed in the operation
Most of those who condemn the operation put up talking points such as "200 killed to release 4". These commentators NEVER condemn the taking of hostages in the first place, and they NEVER condemn Hamas for unlawfully keeping hostages in civilian areas
What's clear here is just how totally captured these commentators are by the extremist pro-Hamas mentality. Notice how after the operation, knowing that Hamas is hiding hostages in densely populated civilian areas, they NEVER call on Hamas to free hostages and stop this.
Even when they find out that people like journalists and doctors are being brought into the Hamas crimes by keeping hostages in their homes, there is never a Road to Damascus moment here, where these people say "oh this is a red line, how dare Hamas do this."
I'll admit over the years to supporting many causes. But there has to be a red line in any cause. Why did supporting Palestinians become an excuse for every Hamas crime imaginable? A normal person would be shocked to find out hostges were held by civilians.
The number of civilians already implicated in the crimes of Oct. 7 and kidnapping and holding hostages is already a large number. This illustrates a radicalized society. We need to ask tough questions about this.
If human rights groups were doing their job, they'd ask tough questions about how Hamas was able to get civilians to hold hostages, including journalists and medical personnel. This endangers these people obviously.
Instead what happens is that all the Hamas men who dress as civilians are described as civilians when they are killed and all these other civilians who take part in hostage taking are all described as civilian professionals when they also end up killed in this war.
The whole process is directed toward trying to "civilianize" Hamas completely, such that, with the exception of Oct. 7, everyone in Gaza is portrayed as a civilian.
If Hamas and the pro-Palestinian crowd had been held to an equal standard many years ago this wouldn't have happened. Hamas was given excuses and empowered to create a criminal terrorist empire in Gaza in which everything is hijacked to help Hamas.
As Hamas hijacked every aspect of civilian society in Gaza, the int'l community was there beside it to whitewash its conquest of that society, and always turn Hamas into "armed groups" and never condemn or mention them.
This is why when Hamas members turn up at hospitals or UN facilities...it's never a shock to the managers of the facility...in fact they always welcome Hamas. When Hamas places hostages in civilian homes, there is never condern or shock.
You can tell how much the int'l community is connected to Hamas by looking at statements after the June 8 raid in Nuseirat. Has even one organization called on civilians in Gaza to stop holding hostages? Has even one? No.
The excuses for Hamas crimes aren't helping Palestinians. Obviously Hamas crimes have always been a setback for two states. Hamas only exists in order to sabotage peace and two states and to create endless war.
If the int'l community had been responsible it would have isolated Hamas and made it clear that its crimes are unacceptable and it would have supported peace and moderate groups; instead of excusing how Hamas radicalized Gaza and took over civilian institutions to exploit them.
x.com
Last edited:
I am guessing the irony of what you wrote escapes you. But, wallow in your liberal Zionist kumbaya moment if you must.
Unfortunately, yes.
Biden's support of genocide will go down in US history as one of the biggest blunders and moral failings ever.
zionism is dead, grandpa.
Netanyahu and his genocide has killed it.
Do you think getting the chance to kill 40,000 Palestinians was worth losing the country?
That's like being called a racist by a nazi.
It will end when Palestinians get their own state and focus on improving their lives, not trying to eliminate their neighbors from the river to the sea...that motto doesn't end well for the Palestinians....as history should've taught them...
"justified hatred" and you claim you didn't justify Oct 7....LOL
There you go again with your racial slurs...you really believe those who criticize hamas are white people?
...that's all you really have going 923 pages in... "I'm brown, I'm a victim and anybody who opposes my view is white". LOLThat's what make sense to me too. But we have come to an era where I am not even sure the Palestinians want that. They, like the Iranian, want Israel eradicated and completely evicted. Am I wrong?
