Great news. A victory for the cause of universal human rights. Full transparencyJust to follow up since as the community notes points out, that tweet is misleading, this is what was actually agreed to.
View attachment 322301
Like I said earlier, how you view this may vary depending on what you think the point of the protests were.Great news. A victory for the cause of universal human rights. Full transparency
Ok, you have declared Palestinians are allowed full human rights.Of course they are full humans and allowed full human rights.
The right to self defence doesn't include any rights to attack civilians, but it does include the right to attack IDF. So your Oct 7 count has to remove all IDF killed on that day as within Palestinian rights. That brings the total down to about 600 civilians and we still don't know how many were killed by Israel's Hannibal Doctrine, likely about half.The right of self-defense does not include the right to attack, rape and kill 1,200 peaceful civilians as Hamas did on Oct.7
A basic human right does not include the right to become Israeli citizens or vote in Israeli elections. As a sovereign nation, Israel has the right to decide who is entitled to become a citizen, just like every other sovereign nation in the world.
This is how the end of South African apartheid started.Like I said earlier, how you view this may vary depending on what you think the point of the protests were.
Transparency on investments and an agreement to publish a report on what can or can't be done to change those investments in winter 2025 may not be seen by some as a victory.
But it sounds like you are suggesting they negotiate for permanent misery instead of perpetual.Those things have to be negotiated. My point is that Palestinian sovereignty should be number 1 on the the priority list. May be some land swaps to enable a contiguous land needs to be agreed to. The alternative is perpetrual misery.
Israel does not have any incentive to agree to a 2 state or a 1 state solution. They have money, power, control and the patronage of the world's most powerful country that will go to any lengths including hurting their own countrymen, to protect Israel. The Palestinians are at a severe disadvantage and it is time to look at their reality and make the best out of it. I am not saying it is just or ideal. I am saying, what else can they do, to get Israel to agree?
Things like BDS take a long time to work. People are fundamentally uncaring so when you tell an American business to choose between money and the Palestinians, they are going to choose money. So I guess what I am saying is, aim for quick wins. And then negotiate from there.
The devil is in the details. For example, no normal person would agree that self-defense means murdering 1,200 innocent civilians in a surprise terrorist attack.Ok, you have declared Palestinians are allowed full human rights.
The right to self determination
The right to self defence
The right of return
Why do you back terrorism.Now you need to explain why you back...
That is the complaint I see some people levelling.Sounds wishy washy to me. When faced with demands you cannot acquiesce to, just throw a committee at it and add more red tape, process complexity to it, so decisions can never get made and the status quo continues.
The new South African talking.The devil is in the details. For example, no normal person would agree that self-defense means murdering 1,200 innocent civilians in a surprise terrorist attack.
Or that self-determination means voting in the elections of a country of which you are not a citizen.
Why do you back terrorism.
Why do you back denying your citizens free and fair elections.
Why do you back using human shields.
Why do you back executing people because of their sexual preferences.
Why do you back taking infants as hostages and then you back defying UN, ICC, ICJ orders to return those hostages immediately and unconditionally.
Ditto on all of this.But it sounds like you are suggesting they negotiate for permanent misery instead of perpetual.
In 2007 Israeli PM Olmert issued this warning:
In an interview with the Israeli newspaper Ha'aretz, Ehud Olmert said Israel was "finished" if it forced the Palestinians into a struggle for equal rights.If the two-state solution collapsed, he said, Israel would "face a South African-style struggle for equal voting rights, and as soon as that happens, the state of Israel is finished". Israel's supporters abroad would quickly turn against such a state, he said."The Jewish organisations, which were our power base in America, will be the first to come out against us because they will say they cannot support a state that does not support democracy and equal voting rights for all its residents," he said.
Those reports have come out and Israel has worked incredibly hard to keep them out of the mainstream. Add in charges at the ICJ and ICC and Israel becomes a pariah state. Already they've lost about half their support of US Jews and the support of most Americans and Canadians. Governments can't continue to be backing an apartheid state in trial for genocide.
For Palestinians this means not fighting for slightly better bantustans it means fighting for the end of zionism and its rule in Israel.
That is now coming.
Agreed, murdering 1,200 civilians, or in this case 300-600 civilians is not self defence.The devil is in the details. For example, no normal person would agree that self-defense means murdering 1,200 innocent civilians in a surprise terrorist attack.
Yes, self determination means having a say in the country you live, including the rights of citizenship and citizens.Or that self-determination means voting in the elections of a country of which you are not a citizen.
I don't back any of those things.Why do you back terrorism.
Why do you back denying your citizens free and fair elections.
Why do you back using human shields.
Why do you back executing people because of their sexual preferences.
Why do you back taking infants as hostages and then you back defying UN, ICC, ICJ orders to return those hostages immediately and unconditionally.
I disagree.Firstly, Israel is full of right wingers. There is not much room for left wing politics in Israel. Even the most liberal guy that gets elected to power, will never give up this idea of a Jewish ethnostate. That is reality.
Secondly, although a 1 state solution will be the most reasonable, there is no chance in hell it happens today. A 1 state solution is something that will maybe, be feasible in another 100 years. But right now, it is not possible. Neither will it have any support in Israel, nor the US.
So the only possible resolution that could maybe happen, and that is a huge maybe, is a 2 state solution.
And ICJ and ICC? They are useless. They always offer "middling" pronouncements, and even if they were to outright call out Israel, nothing will happen. An ICC arrest warrant? Useless again. There is no way, anyone can enforce anything, against any country. Israel does not care about being a pariah state because they have the US at their beck and call and most other western nations will fall in line behind their big brother. That is all they need.
Given all this, the end of Zionism is a lofty goal because the Palestinians themselves are not united under one movement and are severely disenfranchised and do not even have good advocates. Therefore, I think "get Israel off our backs" should be the number 1 priority even if it means just a slightly better Bantustan.
Already we have the Greens and NDP calling out for Palestinian rights.Well, I guess we can hope! I guess I am a bit more cynical and pessimistic on this. Will Canada and EU sanction Israel? Will they go against big bro USA? I think not, but if they do, hey, I would love to be wrong!
With American students setting up tents on campuses? I thought that it started this way.This is how the end of South African apartheid started.
Call me what you wish, but I am talking the truth to you.The new South African talking....
Then why are Hamas using their own people as human shields as their method of self defense. Hamas intentionally triggered an enormous increase in Israeli aggression on Oct.7 after having built their military infrastructure directly alongside civilian populations, hospitals and schools.Agreed, murdering 1,200 civilians, or in this case 300-600 civilians is not self defence.
Murdering 35,000 civilians, including 25,000 women and children is therefore also not self defence.
Self-determination does not mean being automatically granted citizenship, the vote, healthcare etc.. Just like Kautilya said he did for Canada, certain rules, standards, conditions, tests etc. must be met. Every sovereign nation on the globe has the right to impose whatever standards they wish for someone to attain those benefits.Yes, self determination means having a say in the country you live, including the rights of citizenship and citizens.
The fact that you do not condemn Hamas for any of these actions means that you most certainly do support them.I don't back any of those things.
You've accused everyone who disagrees with a word you say, of which there are dozens and dozens, of backing all those things to the point that your accusations are considered nothing more than bombast. Maybe you shouldn't have cried wolf so often.Why do you back an illegal occupation?
Why do you back colonialism?
Why do you back apartheid?
Why do you back genocide?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internal_resistance_to_apartheidWith American students setting up tents on campuses? I thought that it started this way.
Internal resistance to apartheid - Wikipedia
You are less truthful than Netanyahu.Call me what you wish, but I am talking the truth to you.
It was Geno's comment that was inaccurate.
Why are you ok with Israel murdering 25,000 women and children, hammy?Then why are Hamas using their own people as human shields as their method of self defense. Hamas intentionally triggered an enormous increase in Israeli aggression on Oct.7 after having built their military infrastructure directly alongside civilian populations, hospitals and schools.
So you don't back equal rights.Self-determination does not mean being automatically granted citizenship, the vote, healthcare etc.. Just like Kautilya said he did for Canada, certain rules, standards, conditions, tests etc. must be met. Every sovereign nation on the globe has the right to impose whatever standards they wish for someone to attain those benefits.
And I told you, I don't support any of those.I asked:
Why do you back terrorism.
Why do you back denying your citizens free and fair elections.
Why do you back using human shields.
Why do you back executing people because of their sexual preferences.
Why do you back taking infants as hostages and then you back defying UN, ICC, ICJ orders to return those hostages immediately and unconditionally.
I'm repeating reports by the UN and human rights organizations, hammy.You've accused everyone who disagrees with a word you say, of which there are dozens and dozens, of backing all those things to the point that your accusations are considered nothing more than bombast. Maybe you shouldn't have cried wolf so often.