Speaking of characterization of statements.I posted a parallel case further up the thread where the cops charged assault with a weapon and dangerous driving and got convictions for pretty much exactly the same scenario.
If their balls weren't bigger than their brains, they would have pulled the murder one charge, laid a new information for DD and AwaW and never given those ludicrously fabricated statements.
I mean, think it through. A guy is in front of you and you ram him with the car going at 15 or 20 mph - probably the max speed you can attain in a couple of seconds. You're going to break - maybe just bruise - the vic's legs and throw him up on the car hood. The vic's not going to go down under the wheels.
What a dumb fucking statement!!!!
Only the three lying police officers claimed that Officer Northrup was standing in front of the car. Zameeer, his wife, the Police Sargeat Collision Expert, the defence expert, the lack of any marks on the front of the car, Officer Northrups smeared handprints on the SIDE windows of the car, the physical injuries to Northrup not including any frontal impact.... All the evidence is that Northrup fell at the side of the car and was run over without Zameer even being able to see him.
So, yeah... there's that evidence.
As for the 15-20 mph? Where did you get that speed from? The BMW only moved 20-30 feet from where it was parked, (the point of initial contract) to where the body was rolled under the car. Is this BMW's new Electromagnetic Rail Gun powered model that can accelerate that fast in such a short distance?
BTW, the link you posted took me to some other Daily Case News kind of page. I didn;t find the case you referred to. So, contrary to TERB customs, I can't comment on it.