The One Spa

Israel at war

Leimonis

Well-known member
Feb 28, 2020
10,090
9,911
113

richaceg

Well-known member
Feb 11, 2009
14,899
6,852
113
I'm using the definition used in the ICJ case against Israel.
That's the only one that counts.

Israel tortures and kills UN workers.
They are a terrorist, pariah state committing genocide.


Israel uses human shields.
ICJ never said genocide was commited...you understood wrong and try your best to cling to what you thought....anything we say won't change your view, because you refuse to understand it....you hate Jews and want them gone....just like Hamas....and that poses a big problem to Israel because it threatens their existence....read the Hamas covenant everyday...
 

richaceg

Well-known member
Feb 11, 2009
14,899
6,852
113
The ICJ said that the case was 'plausible' so ordered Israel to not commit genocide, prevent killing Palestinians in Gaza and allow all aid through.
Israel has not abided and will stand trial for genocide.

After that the ICJ will rule on whether genocide has been committed

They never said "Israel commited genocide"...what they said is..."whatever steps you gonna take to get Hamas, make sure civilian casualties is at a minimum"...
 

Leimonis

Well-known member
Feb 28, 2020
10,090
9,911
113

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
94,117
23,653
113
They never said "Israel commited genocide"...what they said is..."whatever steps you gonna take to get Hamas, make sure civilian casualties is at a minimum"...
Of course they didn't, its a court, they have to hold a trial before they issue a verdict.
What they said is the charges are plausible and Israel should not do any genocidal shite.

So Israel will go on trial for genocide.

Israeli tank strike killed ‘clearly identifiable’ Reuters reporter: UN report


 
  • Angry
Reactions: Klatuu

richaceg

Well-known member
Feb 11, 2009
14,899
6,852
113
  • Like
Reactions: whynot888

Robert Mugabe

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2017
9,793
6,832
113
So I watched Erin Burnett interviewing the ex Israeli Prime Minister last night. His point was that Israel will continue the slaughter until they have killed every Hamas member which does entail a full onslaught of the remaining enclave of Rafa, regardless of the killing of any civilians sheltering there. He mansplained to her that it is the only way to solve the problem once and for all. Once that is done there will be no hard feelings from the Palestinians and all will be fixed and back to normal. He didn't explain how you get em all. Just take a sledge hammer to it. What am I missing here?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Klatuu

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
94,117
23,653
113
Whe did they say the "charges were plausible "? Stop making shit up.
Its in the ruling.
A top U.N. court says Gaza genocide is 'plausible' but does not order cease-fire

Before delivering the decision, Donoghue read statements from Israeli officials that she said made South Africa's case plausible. She also gave a bleak assessment of the deteriorating humanitarian situation in Gaza.

"In the Court's view, the facts and circumstances mentioned above are sufficient to conclude that at least some of the rights claimed by South Africa and for which it is seeking protection are plausible. This is the case with respect to the right of the Palestinians in Gaza to be protected from acts of genocide and related prohibited acts," the court decision said.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
94,117
23,653
113
So I watched Erin Burnett interviewing the ex Israeli Prime Minister last night. His point was that Israel will continue the slaughter until they have killed every Hamas member which does entail a full onslaught of the remaining enclave of Rafa, regardless of the killing of any civilians sheltering there. He mansplained to her that it is the only way to solve the problem once and for all. Once that is done there will be no hard feelings from the Palestinians and all will be fixed and back to normal. He didn't explain how you get em all. Just take a sledge hammer to it. What am I missing here?
That Hamas is the government, the police and a party still supported by most Palestinians in Gaza.
Netanyahu would love to kill them all but would at least likely try to kill every male of age.

 

richaceg

Well-known member
Feb 11, 2009
14,899
6,852
113
Its in the ruling.
A top U.N. court says Gaza genocide is 'plausible' but does not order cease-fire

Before delivering the decision, Donoghue read statements from Israeli officials that she said made South Africa's case plausible. She also gave a bleak assessment of the deteriorating humanitarian situation in Gaza.

"In the Court's view, the facts and circumstances mentioned above are sufficient to conclude that at least some of the rights claimed by South Africa and for which it is seeking protection are plausible. This is the case with respect to the right of the Palestinians in Gaza to be protected from acts of genocide and related prohibited acts," the court decision said.
The International Court of Justice has found it is "plausible" that Israel has committed acts that violate the Genocide Convention. In a provisional order delivered by the court's president, Joan Donoghue, the court said Israel must ensure "with immediate effect" that its forces not commit any of the acts prohibited by the convention

So they already had a ruling on it...and can't state Israel commited genocide....If there was no evidence of Israel committed genocide after 3 months of bombing Gaza...what makes you think the result will be different 3 months from now? Unless Hamas release hostages and surrenders ICJ ruling will never change...
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
94,117
23,653
113
The International Court of Justice has found it is "plausible" that Israel has committed acts that violate the Genocide Convention. In a provisional order delivered by the court's president, Joan Donoghue, the court said Israel must ensure "with immediate effect" that its forces not commit any of the acts prohibited by the convention

So they already had a ruling on it...and can't state Israel commited genocide....If there was no evidence of Israel committed genocide after 3 months of bombing Gaza...what makes you think the result will be different 3 months from now? Unless Hamas release hostages and surrenders ICJ ruling will never change...
You are a bit thick, aren't you rich?

SA submits the charges to the ICJ. The ICJ looks at the charges and decides whether they should take them to trial, they make a ruling saying the charges are 'plausible' then order Israel to not commit genocide, prevent killing Palestinians in Gaza and allow all aid through and then report back on that progress after 30 days. Israel submitted their report after 30 days, SA submitted their reply along with another request for urgent action and now we await the ICJ's next steps.

Its almost certain the charges of genocide against Israel will be taken to trial. That is when a ruling on whether or not zionists are genocidal will be made.

Meanwhile you keep backing a racist movement that is putting zionism on the same moral ground as the nazis.



 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
53,159
11,337
113
Toronto
I'm using the definition used in the ICJ case against Israel.
That's the only one that counts.
Are they a branch of the UN, the body that you say we must always agree with?

The UN, as a world body, refuses to call for a ceasefire and refuses to pass a resolution saying that Israel is committing genocide. Show us those resolutions and the resolution numbers.

You really aren't very smart. If you were, you wouldn't keep painting yourself into corners on a daily basis.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts