Climate Change

[JohnLarue]

You've posted the opinions of this physicist as if they were science.

If he is so brilliant, post the research papers and data backing his claims.
If he is a scientist that has seriously studied the issue that should be easy to do.

After all, the thousands of scientists you keep trying assassinate characters all post their work, data and papers publicly so you can check them.
Where is the science?

ha ha

the better question is where is the " cloud-sunlight-reflexivity thermostat mechanism" in the propaganda you flaunt as 'science'
science propaganda which is based on flawed computer models

cloud formation is currently impossible to model correctly...... so they just ignore it.

Where is the science?

If he is so brilliant

btw he won a noble prise in physics
his brilliance has been confirmed

did you pass even one high school level physics class before you dropped out of school ?
Apparently not

 

[JohnLarue]

JOHN CLAUSER, 2022 PHYSICS NOBEL PRIZE WINNER:

"I can very confidently assert, there is NO climate emergency."
“As much as it may upset many people, my message is the planet is NOT in peril. … atmospheric CO2 and methane have negligible effect on the climate.

The policies government have been implementing are total unnecessary and should be eliminated.
So far, [we] have totally misidentified what is the dominant process in controlling the climate, and all of the various models are based on incomplete and incorrect physics.
The dominant process, is “the cloud-sunlight-reflexivity thermostat mechanism. Clouds are all bright white, and they reflected 90% of the sunlight back into space making them the most crucial yet most overlooked aspect of the climate system. Two-thirds of the Earth are ocean. The Pacific Ocean alone is half the Earth. The average cloud cover for the Earth is 67%; about 50% over land and 75% over oceans.
I claim that the above conspicuous properties of clouds are the missing part of the puzzle.

I can very confidently assert, there is no climate emergency."

polar bear extinction
ocean acidification
coral bleaching
droughts / floods
wild fires
more / less snow
extreme weather events
global boiling
crop failure
catastrophic sea level rise

all broken hockey sticks and evil propaganda lies

the con has not worked

 

[Frankfooter]

ha ha

the better question is where is the " cloud-sunlight-reflexivity thermostat mechanism" in the propaganda you flaunt as 'science'
science propaganda which is based on flawed computer models

cloud formation is currently impossible to model correctly...... so they just ignore it.

Where is the science?


btw he won a noble prise in physics
his brilliance has been confirmed

did you pass even one high school level physics class before you dropped out of school ?
Apparently not

The IPCC has been correctly projecting the global temperature and climate for decades and their work keeps getting more accurate.
They won a Nobel.

So why do you ignore their work in the field and only listen to the opinion, and not scientific work, of this one physicist instead?
Why do use character assassinations on 99.9% of scientists then say its wrong to do so on the single, non climatologist you like?

Why do you ignore the physical proof of the models by NASA?
Why can't Clauser make a single accurate projection of the climate?

And here is a post rebutting Clauser's claims about clouds.

 

[Frankfooter]

JOHN CLAUSER, 2022 PHYSICS NOBEL PRIZE WINNER:

Clauser is also a paid lobbyist, he's on the board of the CO2 Coalition.

About - CO2 Coalition

co2coalition.org

 

[JohnLarue]

You're back to cut and paste spamming, larue.
This always happens when you can't debate the facts.
Every single time.

The global temp is rising just like the IPCC warned.
Coral bleaching is hitting its 5th major event in 8 years.
Polar bears are struggling.
The oceans are acidifying.
Canadian farmers are struggling with drought in the prairies and floods elsewhere.
This was the warmest winter in Toronto/Canada.

Everything on your list is happening just as the IPCC projected.

oh
the climate clown doubles down
on failed propaganda once again

you have proven yourself to be completely untrustworthy

 

[Frankfooter]

oh
the climate clown doubles down
on failed propaganda once again

you have proven yourself to be completely untrustworthy

You've lost the argument, larue.
All you've got are insults and one oil lobbyist.

 

[roddermac]

You've lost the argument, larue.
All you've got are insults and one oil lobbyist.

Why are you so afraid of climate change?

 

[y2kmark]

Why are you so afraid of climate change?

Food and water supply mostly, why do you ask?

 

[roddermac]

Food and water supply mostly, why do you ask?

Israel has found a way do do both in the desert. Why can't the rest of the world.

 

[Frankfooter]

Why are you so afraid of climate change?

Because its going to make life miserable for most of the world.

 

[Frankfooter]

Israel has found a way do do both in the desert. Why can't the rest of the world.

You think the rest of the world should steal someone else's water and land?

 

[roddermac]

You think the rest of the world should steal someone else's water and land?

desalination is not theft. other countries have their own water and land to so so.

 

[Frankfooter]

desalination is not theft. other countries have their own water and land to so so.

But Israel is clearly stealing Palestinian water as their solution do water issues.
If you were just talking desalination there are other, better examples.

 

[Not getting younger]

Food and water supply mostly, why do you ask?

So.
in a world that no-one can envision. Even the experts admit this. How do we know climate change is a “bad” thing. We do know precipitation patterns will change, and we do know nature has a magical way of balancing carrying capacity.

Speaking of water.
We have over 20% of the worlds fresh water….. just…. in the Great Lakes. Never mind what’s a little north, a lot north, or right in and under your yards.

For a bunch of environment champions. Odd that we are shitting in it, like there’s no tomorrow nor lifting a hand.

 

[JohnLarue]

So.
in a world that no-one can envision. Even the experts admit this. How do we know climate change is a “bad” thing. We do know precipitation patterns will change, and we do know nature has a magical way of balancing carrying capacity.

Speaking of water.
We have over 20% of the worlds fresh water….. just…. in the Great Lakes. Never mind what’s a little north, a lot north, or right in and under your yards.

For a bunch of environment champions. Odd that we are shitting in it, like there’s no tomorrow nor lifting a hand.

CO2 is plant food and the increase in CO2 have help drive continuous crop yield improvements




in addition more CO2 in the atmosphere reduces the plants water usage.

finally more CO2 is making the planet greener.



The only danger is the loonie lefts attempts to reverse these wonderful trends via their ideological driven fools agenda

 

[roddermac]

But Israel is clearly stealing Palestinian water as their solution do water issues.
If you were just talking desalination there are other, better examples.

Netherlands is the largest food importer in the world. How does Israel steal water when they get it from the sea.

 

[Frankfooter]

CO2 is plant food and the increase in CO2 have help drive continuous crop yield improvements

View attachment 304242


in addition more CO2 in the atmosphere reduces the plants water usage.

finally more CO2 is making the planet greener.
View attachment 304248


The only danger is the loonie lefts attempts to reverse these wonderful trends via their ideological driven fools agenda

Correlation is not causation.
Trying to claim that crop yields are rising from CO2 when you also keep claiming that CO2 is too small a part of the atmosphere to cause climate change is idiotically hypocritical. Only a true moron would think both claims are true.

Which is it, can CO2 increases raise crop yields or are they too small to change the climate?

 

[JohnLarue]

Correlation is not causation.
Trying to claim that crop yields are rising from CO2 when you also keep claiming that CO2 is too small a part of the atmosphere to cause climate change is idiotically hypocritical. Only a true moron would think both claims are true.

Which is it, can CO2 increases raise crop yields or are they too small to change the climate?

your ignorance of science is on full display.... once again

those are two completely different processes
photosynthesis is a chemical process - small changes can have a significant effect
it is also a non -reversable reaction so increases in the input drive the reaction
A separate process (decomposition or cellular respiration ) is required to release CO2 previously bound by plants

absorption of infrared radiation is a physical process - small changes do not cause a significant effect.

chemical processes determines chemical structure
chemical structure determines physical properties
physical properties determines physical effects/ processes

so do not try to compare chemical effects/ processes to physical effects/ processes (grade 10 science class)
which is exactly what you have ignorantly done

what is idiotic is you pretending you have any scientific understanding
it is idiotic and comical

Correlation is not causation.

that is the fundamental issue with the anthropogenic climate change narrative
a 0.01% change in atmospheric composition can not possibly heat up the atmosphere, oceans and surface land mass by any measurable amount
absorption of infrared radiation is a physical process - small changes do not cause a significant effect.
there is also a logarithmic relationship between concentration and absorption , therefore diminishing returns with each incremental addition
absorption by co2 is saturated and has been for millions of years

climate systems are non linear, dynamic, chaotic systems with many many inputs & interdependences
you incorrectly view climate as driven solely by an inert trace gas measure in parts per million
co2 is not the control knob for climate

when is your next clown show ?

 

[JohnLarue]

Netherlands is the largest food importer in the world. How does Israel steal water when they get it from the sea.

actually the Netherlands is the second largest food importer exporter in the world

 

[Not getting younger]

CO2 is plant food and the increase in CO2 have help drive continuous crop yield improvements

View attachment 304242


in addition more CO2 in the atmosphere reduces the plants water usage.

finally more CO2 is making the planet greener.
View attachment 304248


The only danger is the loonie lefts attempts to reverse these wonderful trends via their ideological driven fools agenda

While I’d dearly love to focus on and change the channel just wee bit and what the GTA is shitting in, plus how vital cold water streams are. Never mind warm water streams and lakes the Kawarthas, Muskokas and many more kettle lakes. Or why people that champion the environment can’t be bothered to lift and hand. Or the fact shit runs downhill to 20% of the world’s surface fresh water, known precipitation changes ( how do we know….nature has a funny way of balancing things)

Or even simply snowpacks and aquafers the champions are pissing and shitting in

Snowmelt Runoff and the Water Cycle | U.S. Geological Survey

Perhaps you've never seen snow. Or, perhaps you built a snowman this very afternoon and perhaps you saw your snowman begin to melt. Regardless of your experience with snow and associated snowmelt, runoff from snowmelt is an important component of the global movement of water, possibly even if...

www.usgs.gov

.

Regarding crop yields since the 60s

Jamie Sarkonak: The Liberals' unserious, unfeasible fertilizer emissions plan

The federal plan to cut total fertilizer emissions to 30 per cent below 2020 levels by the end of the decade is really just a funding package for research and techn…

nationalpost.com