INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE: LATEST

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
51,719
10,119
113
Toronto
If someone tells you - "Don't do XYZ". It means they think you currently do XYZ.
Not true at all.

They would say don't do it again or don't keep doing it. ICJ said "we're not saying that you have done XYZ, but just in case make sure you don't start now."

Your logic seems to be as weak your claim of neutrality.
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
51,719
10,119
113
Toronto
The ICJ says evidence that Israel is committing genocide is 'plausible'
Thank you for agreeing that the ICJ did NOT declare that Israel is actually committing genocide. So now you need to stop saying that Israel should stop committing genocide. How can you stop doing something that you have not been doing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Knuckle Ball

toguy5252

Well-known member
Jun 22, 2009
15,964
6,108
113
Not true at all.

They would say don't do it again or don't keep doing it. ICJ said "we're not saying that you have done XYZ, but just in case make sure you don't start now."

Your logic seems to be as weak your claim of neutrality.
One of the 10 commandments says thou shalt not kill so I must be a killer.
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
51,719
10,119
113
Toronto
Yes, they have politicians in the US wrapped around their finger. It is a problem.
That's the way the world has always worked. Deal with it. Palestinian's only method of influence peddling is violence. How's that working out for them and the 25,000 resultant deaths.

The court also ruled that Israel must take steps to prevent genocide, which means Israel is not preventing genocide right now, which consequentially means that Israel is committing genocide.
That line of thinking is as wrong this time as it was the 1st time, when I debunked it. Like the Rolaids commercial:

How do you spell desperate? Kautilya.
 

toguy5252

Well-known member
Jun 22, 2009
15,964
6,108
113
No they did not. The verdict is explicitly clear. Let me paraphrase for you - "Stop the genocide of the Palestinians from the river to the sea".

And that violence will continue as long as the genocide continues. This is why activism here in the west is important.
LOL. Add paraphrasing to the list of English skills of which you have no clue.
 

toguy5252

Well-known member
Jun 22, 2009
15,964
6,108
113
Thank you for agreeing that the ICJ did NOT declare that Israel is actually committing genocide. So now you need to stop saying that Israel should stop committing genocide. How can you stop doing something that you have not been doing.
The ruling required Israel to prevent and punish any public incitements to commit genocide against Palestinians in Gaza and to preserve evidence related to any allegations of genocide there
 

toguy5252

Well-known member
Jun 22, 2009
15,964
6,108
113
The ruling required Israel to prevent and punish any public incitements to commit genocide against Palestinians in Gaza and to preserve evidence related to any allegations of genocide there

Thant is they did not say stop the genocide they said prevent genocide.
 

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
32,700
60,769
113
You don't understand the ruling.

No judge found Israel guilty of genocide. 2 judges dismissed the charges immediately.

15 judges directed Israel to take steps to ensure that genocide didn't take place and adjourned the case. No judge found Israel guilty of genocide. There you go.
I saw a couple of the individual judge's statements linked.
Is anyone going to link to the actual decision?

Here.
All the relevant documents.

 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,866
22,266
113
The ICJ made no rulings saying that Israel needs to do anything differently.

If you think otherwise, then you are the delusional one.
The ICJ says evidence that Israel is committing genocide is 'plausible' so demands Israel stop committing genocide and report back in a month.
Just as they say Israel must preserve all evidence of allegations of genocide for trial.

Israel is to report back on the actions they took in that month, that report will be sent to South Africa and then South Africa will decide whether to proceed to trial with Israel's genocide.

After Israel's actions on day one of that verdict its almost certain Israel will be put on trial for genocide at the ICJ.

And you think that is a win.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Klatuu

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,866
22,266
113
I saw a couple of the individual judge's statements linked.
Is anyone going to link to the actual decision?

Here.
All the relevant documents.

The full decision is here.


The ICJ says the case that Israel is committing genocide is 'plausible' so demands Israel stop committing genocide and report back in a month.
Just as they say Israel must preserve all evidence of allegations of genocide for trial.

Israel is to report back on the actions they took to end the genocide in that month, that report will be sent to South Africa and then South Africa will decide whether to proceed to trial with Israel's genocide.

After Israel's actions on day one of that verdict its almost certain Israel will be put on trial for genocide at the ICJ
 
Toronto Escorts