Sexy Friends Toronto

Israel at war

Previous Thread Next Thread
R

richaceg

Well-known member
Feb 11, 2009
13,833
5,618
113
Hamas getting exposed....they do use schools, hospitals and residential areas....Cowards using civilian infrastructures....stage 4 cancer in Gaza...
 
Last edited:
S

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
51,424
9,979
113
Toronto
Frankfooter said:
You really have no clue.
Until you read the Amnesty, HRW, UN and B'tselem reports you're just posting from ignorance and hate.
Click to expand...
It matters not what they say. Undeniably they redefined the word as it was initially defined by S. Africa. End of story. New definitions means that a new name is in order. Two different things do not have the same name. It's like saying that you are a racist and you are untrustworthy are the same.

Question: Does their definition of apartheid contain the same parameters as that of S. Africa? The SA parameters dealt only with citizens of their country. It did not affect people living outside of their borders AKA foreigners.

The hate part you mention is the hatred of Israel, which was their motivation in changing the definition. Glad to see that you are continuing that fine tradition of anti-Semitism, racism and hate. Maybe they can call it "a-part-of-our-hate".

Are you still calling for all Palestinians to have the full rights of Israeli citizens including the vote?
 
Last edited:
S

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
51,424
9,979
113
Toronto
Frankfooter said:
Maybe Netanyahu should have listened to previous PM warnings and settled for the two state solution instead of going for apartheid.
Israel are the occupying power, its their choice to continue settler colonialism and apartheid.
Click to expand...
The 1948 the Arabs rejected a 2 state solution. Arafat rejected a 2 state solution.

There is no apartheid. All Israeli citizens have the same rights.
 
K

Klatuu

Well-known member
Dec 31, 2022
5,662
3,314
113
shack said:
It matters not what they say. Undeniably they redefined the word as it was initially defined by S. Africa. End of story. New definitions means that a new name is in order. Two different things do not have the same name. It's like saying that you are a racist and you are untrustworthy are the same.

Question: Does their definition of apartheid contain the same parameters as that of S. Africa? The SA parameters dealt only with citizens of their country. It did not affect people living outside of their borders AKA foreigners.

The hate part you mention is the hatred of Israel, which was their motivation in changing the definition. Glad to see that you are continuing that fine tradition of anti-Semitism, racism and hate. Maybe they can call it "a-part-of-our-hate".

Are you still calling for all Palestinians to have the full rights of Israeli citizens including the vote?
Click to expand...
Childish
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Previous Thread Next Thread
Toronto Escorts
Top Bottom