Yuh. You didn't need steam locomotives because India was doing just fine - aside from a famine every few months. The British built railways to transport excess food from one region to another to prevent starvation because India was too fucked up and useless to do that for herself.No. Because we had lands rich in natural resources, human capital, wealth, tasty food and culture, that we did not have the need to go invade other people's cold, snowy lands. We minded our own business, unlike the Europeans, who stole and brutalized the entire world and continue to do it or support those who do it even in the 21st century, while claiming to be the guardians of civilization (which they are not).
WTF?...
In fact, non whites invented fuck all after 1300, right? Whites invented everything.
That’s stupid even by your standards.
Got my vote. Bunch of cockroaches.
The ones multiplying in Israel are the Orthodox. & kids, welfare no military. Some of them feel the existance of Israel is a sin and against the Torah. .Considering that people who built todays civilization don’t feel like multiplying while poor and dumb of the world do, the demographic trends look pretty bad for the entire world
Don't you think that would reduce the value of the real estate and shower the rest of Israel with radioactive dust?Waste of good ammunition. A tactical nuclear weapon could wipe out Gaza cleanly without putting any Israeli lives at risk.
you can defend youself up to and including killing him. However, you are not allowed go to his house and kill all his kids, his entire family, neighbours and demolish her houses. If you had booted his family out of their houses through force of arms, then you deserve it and I will be there to add salt for my own amusement.Let's do an example. I have a neighbour who comes over to my house with a knife and a pair of pliers and cuts my fingers off every Monday. Now this is not an "existential threat", but it is nasty. Do I get to defend myself against that neighbour or not?
The starvation is Israeli policy.
Are you both cheering for the killing of journalists and then trying to make a joke that it was a 'birthday present' from Israel?
Yes, the side that's winning usually surrenders. Don't you think that it's Hamas' responsibility to protect their own citizens, not Israel?Surrender by Israel would be even better. Solving the Gaza, West Bank and Lebanon problems in an instant. Don’t you agree sad Shack?
Yes. Being disenfranchised is the most important. That is your typical play. Dismiss a point out of hand because you can't provide a logical rebuttal.The right to vote, is not the only thing that is linked or even the most important thing with Apartheid.
They changed the original definition as it explicitly applied to S. African policy. That policy did not affect any non-citizens. If you want to include a policy designed against foreigners, call it something else. It is not how the S. Africans applied that term.The definition of apartheid, per international law, which is the only definition that matters, which is universally accepted and applied equally to all nations, shows that Israel is an apartheid state.
Evidently you are that obtuse.I understood your post.
You're just trying to walk back calling genocide as serious as a hangnail.