Israel at war
- Thread starter Butler1000
- Start date
There are close to 10,000 dead, shack.
Israel is clearly not avoiding civilians.
How do you think this works, shack?
Do they march around with civilians at gunpoint?
Do you think Hamas has a tunnel underneath every single building destroyed?
Why would Hamas use human shields, Israel is bombing the shit out of Gaza regardless of what is there.
You push a really stupid argument to idiocy daily.
All to defend Jewish supremacy.
The red cross says there were no Hamas near the ambulances.
Your just justifying genocide.
Yes, now Israel is a pariah state.
Antisemitism and hate crimes are on the rise.
And Israel will face global sanctions.
10 minutes after Blinken met with Netanyahu he bombed 3 hospitals.
This sums up the situation. Netanyahu knows he has to stop.
Israel trying to kill ‘as many Palestinians as possible’ as pressure mounts, analyst says
Israel killed Americans who were told to go to the crossing by Israel.
Israel trying to kill ‘as many Palestinians as possible’ as pressure mounts, analyst says
Israel killed Americans who were told to go to the crossing by Israel.
IDF nonsense to justify war crimes.
The next war will be against AIPAC and Project Butterfy.
Then the sanctions start.
Why Israel Slept
The long catalogue of intelligence failures that allowed Hamas to stage its brutal surprise attack on October 7 begins at The Venetian, Sheldon Adelson’s Las Vegas resort.
www.thenation.com
Congrats, you helped kill another terrorist.
Sorry. In this particular situation, Hamas is inextricably linked to the Gazan civilians killed.
Hamas triggered Israeli retaliation on Oct 7 which has resulted in death and suffering.
Yes or no, do you think that so many Gazans would have been killed in the last 4 weeks if Hamas had not launched their attack on Oct. 7.
I know that frank would never answer such a question, but at this point I consider you be much more honourable and a more honest debater than frank, so I hope that you will do me the courtesy. Feel free to expound on your reasoning, but I'd like to hear a yes or no.
Quite possibly not, but I'm using that as an example of a historical reality. The loser of war has more casualties. And the corollary is that having more casualties is what causes one side to lose the war.
I don't think that will ever change. You're not going to win a war by keeping things proportional.
Should Hamas be taken to the Hague for the Oct. 7 attack? Clearly they targetted civilians.
You are the most dishonest person on this board, shack.
You make repeated demands that everyone answer your questions, then change the terms so you can say they didn't answer.
You refuse to answer any questions or to make even basic statements.
Like your refusal to say you shouldn't kill children.
So you'll get something like this for every post until you do.
Here's one of your failures, shack. A couple of terrorists who lived.
You better send more money for bombs.
Yes, take them and take the Israeli leadership and anyone who pulled a trigger to the Hague.
Do you agree?
Do you think that so many Gazans would be dead in the last 4 weeks if Hamas had not launched their attack on Oct 7? Yes or no.
Clearly the answer is no yet you still support that attack. You obviously don't care how many Gazans die.
Hamas arent following the rules either by using civilians as human shields
Yes. But you didn't call that out. You called out the slaughter of the Jews by Hitler and said it was opposed by now. Which is ridiculous. Millions died opposing it.
The same way neither Israel nor anyone else wants to take in Palestinian refugees and you defend that? Bit hypocritical, no? Also not what you called out either. Kind of unfair to act like I implied Jews never suffered except at the hands of Hitler when I all I did was point out the folly of your statement claiming "the slaughter of Jews by Hitler was opposed by no one."
No, they don't. Repeatedly the UN has turned any issue raised regarding Israel and Palestine to be a demand for Israel to end their illegal occupation, and everytime the vote passes by a large margin and the US steps in to veto it.
You're the one that has that honour all locked up. I think they'll name that trophy after you.
Starting Oct. 8, you have refused to say that Hamas' attack on Israeli citizens of Oct. 7 was an act of terror.
You set the rules of engagement and I'm following your precedent. It's funny how you don't like someone using the same tactics that you initiated. That is so typical of you. You like to dish it out, but you clearly can't take it.
