Israel at war
- Thread starter Butler1000
- Start date
Excellent! Now apply that exact same logic to 'reconciliation' with First Nations here in Canada....oops...
Time for the usual...
Why Arabs Lose Wars
Arabic-speaking armies have been generally ineffective in the modern era. Egyptian regular forces did poorly against Yemeni irregulars in the 1960s.1 Syrians could only impose their will in Lebanon during the mid-1970s by the use of overwhelming
www.meforum.org
Lose every time and then whine & cry
oh yes, tribes never ever moved around and the people that were there were always there. Hilarious, you're so brainwashed.
If you can find people alive who were there before the First Nations, let me know.
A devout Muslim cannot accept that a non Muslim can seize and hold land that has previously been a Muslim land and must wage permanent jihad against the unbelievers until they are all dead or converted to Islam or driven out and the land is once again blessed by Allah.
Do ordinary Muslims believe that?.... Probably not 100%. But HAMAS believes it.
Under British rule, the Jews bombed the king david hotel, terrorism against the Brits. The Brits passed the buck to the UN and now Palestine is the cluster fuck it is.
The NDP Sharia Law proposal died thanks to protests by Muslim Iranian (Persian) women.
But it doesn't matter, does it?
They were turfed over 50 years ago by a nation with a first rate army and nukes. The Israelis ain't going anywhere. No matter how many suicide bombers offer their souls to Allah, the Jews are there to stay.
So the Palestinians either adapt to that reality. Or leave.
Is this the makeup of the UN Security Council?
"You're talking about the alleged Human Rights Council that includes paragons like
Algeria, Angola, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Cameroon, China, both Congos, Cuba, Djibouti, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Gabon, Iraq, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Libya, Nicaragua, Qatar, Russia, Rwanda, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Sudan, Thailand, Uganda, UAE, Uzbekistan, Venezuela, and Vietnam.
At least a third of the council is made up of massively authoritarian regimes who behave in ways you would normally condemn but since the council ridiculously fixates on Israel like you do, you fully support them."
"You're talking about the alleged Human Rights Council that includes paragons like
Algeria, Angola, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Cameroon, China, both Congos, Cuba, Djibouti, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Gabon, Iraq, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Libya, Nicaragua, Qatar, Russia, Rwanda, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Sudan, Thailand, Uganda, UAE, Uzbekistan, Venezuela, and Vietnam.
At least a third of the council is made up of massively authoritarian regimes who behave in ways you would normally condemn but since the council ridiculously fixates on Israel like you do, you fully support them."
Yuh. My uncle and my best friend's dad served there in the British army and it was miserable as fuck!
Prior to the Brits controlling Palestine, that area was under Ottoman control and called something else. The Brits promised the Arabs in the area their own state if they took up arms against the Ottoman Empire.
Not sure they did. They offered the Saudis their own state and were taken up on the offer. Palestine was closely controlled by the Ottomans until 1918.
This one for sure was all Britain's fault. They offered the Jews a Homeland in Palestine and being British, they assumed everyone would be reasonable and discuss their issues over tea. And when the Jews and Arabs were "damned uncivilized and bad sports about the whole show!" fucked off quickly back to Britain.All problems start with the British.
well that’s one of a few misconceptions you have. Also an interesting choice of words. Because prior to, and during British rule. Palestine never existed. Period. And had they tried to give peace a chance, longer than 24 hours….who knows what Palestine might look like today.
And AFAIK Jews were in that area as well predating the Ottomans. Did king David not decree that 3,000 years ago.?
be all that as it may, that’s all ancient history.
