Oakville teacher wears huge prosthetic breasts to shop class

Dutch Oven

Well-known member
Feb 12, 2019
6,996
2,483
113
What debate is this, Richie?

Mr 1947 Private Eye is lurking outside a school in Hamilton, so he can jump out and confront the formerly large-breasted and cross-dressing Lemieux. Is there an issue or argument there that I missed. It just seemed like time-wasting and mental wanking to me.
Of course there's something you are missing. In fact, you are missing the point entirely. Menzies has had a fair bit of contact with Lemieux, perhaps more than any other reporter. Menzies has said that it is his theory that Lemieux is a sexual pervert that is deriving some sexual enjoyment from his antics. Not a disingenuous right winger trying to embarrass the school board. Not a genuine trans person. Not a cross dresser who wants to present as a woman as a matter of identity.

In other words, Menzies thinks Lemieux should not be working with teenage children in a position of authority. Seems like the kind of story an ethical journalist might stick with until there is some sort of resolution. Put another way, Menzies is doing the job that the Board of Education should be doing by actually getting to the bottom of Lemieux's fitness to teach.

And, of course, because Menzies has not been delegated any authority from the government, and is instead acting as a member of the free press, you absolutely hate what he's doing, authoritarian that you are!
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,866
22,266
113
"right wingers" how would you know it's right wingers? is this one of your conspiracy theories?
You haven't been paying attention.
All through the busty larue threads there were repeated reports of right winger threats to schools.
These are continuing now and only right wingers would still be pulling this kind of nonsense.
 

richaceg

Well-known member
Feb 11, 2009
14,027
5,817
113
You haven't been paying attention.
All through the busty larue threads there were repeated reports of right winger threats to schools.
These are continuing now and only right wingers would still be pulling this kind of nonsense.
I call bullshit...what makes you think they are right wingers...because you say so?
 

richaceg

Well-known member
Feb 11, 2009
14,027
5,817
113
right wingers are angry and stupid...
also left wingers: trans females can give birth.
also left wingers: trans females are real women
also left wingers: think this is a woman... :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: i mean is he even trying?
 
  • Like
Reactions: mitchell76

mandrill

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2001
76,541
88,162
113
If he's doing illegal business in schools stalking that teacher...let's have him arrested...if he's doing business within his rights...what's in it to you?
I get to call people "dicks", if I think they're dicks, Richie.

What's in it to you?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Frankfooter

mandrill

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2001
76,541
88,162
113
Of course there's something you are missing. In fact, you are missing the point entirely. Menzies has had a fair bit of contact with Lemieux, perhaps more than any other reporter. Menzies has said that it is his theory that Lemieux is a sexual pervert that is deriving some sexual enjoyment from his antics. Not a disingenuous right winger trying to embarrass the school board. Not a genuine trans person. Not a cross dresser who wants to present as a woman as a matter of identity.

In other words, Menzies thinks Lemieux should not be working with teenage children in a position of authority. Seems like the kind of story an ethical journalist might stick with until there is some sort of resolution. Put another way, Menzies is doing the job that the Board of Education should be doing by actually getting to the bottom of Lemieux's fitness to teach.

And, of course, because Menzies has not been delegated any authority from the government, and is instead acting as a member of the free press, you absolutely hate what he's doing, authoritarian that you are!
Menzies has no proof of why LeMieux does anything, right?

So he just makes up whatever he thinks will titillate his audience. If he has no evidence of what he's claiming, then he's an asshole lying piece of shit who runs his mouth.
 
  • Like
Reactions: silentkisser

Skoob

Well-known member
Jun 1, 2022
6,796
3,940
113
In other words, Menzies thinks Lemieux should not be working with teenage children in a position of authority. Seems like the kind of story an ethical journalist might stick with until there is some sort of resolution. Put another way, Menzies is doing the job that the Board of Education should be doing by actually getting to the bottom of Lemieux's fitness to teach.
The Board of Education...actually putting in the effort to go after a union teacher? hahahahahaha That sounds like too much work! Imagine all the paperwork and meetings that would need to take place! Much easier to do nothing and count the days until early retirement on a juice pension than deal with negative impacts to children. Ain't nobody got time for that!
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,866
22,266
113
  • Wow
Reactions: mandrill

Dutch Oven

Well-known member
Feb 12, 2019
6,996
2,483
113
Menzies has no proof of why LeMieux does anything, right?

So he just makes up whatever he thinks will titillate his audience. If he has no evidence of what he's claiming, then he's an asshole lying piece of shit who runs his mouth.
Nope, wrong again. Menzies has 1st person reports of this guy's pervy behaviour. Start watching this at about 50 mins in, and he outlines the evidence he has received:

 
  • Like
Reactions: mitchell76

mandrill

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2001
76,541
88,162
113
Nope, wrong again. Menzies has 1st person reports of this guy's pervy behaviour. Start watching this at about 50 mins in, and he outlines the evidence he has received:

I just wasted 4:21 of my life listening to a saggy old hack pseudo journo who dyes his hair orange telling the credulous that he has "an un named source" who claims that Busty jerks off to young girls while dressed in women's clothes.

Apparently, this only happened on 1 recorded instance and the un named source just happened to be there at the time. But the un named source apparently saw an unmistakable male erection under the fake boobage and skirt as Busty was sitting - not standing - there and despite the fact that the lights were dimmed and Busty wasn't sitting close to the "un named source" - at least not that we're told.

This is about as large a turd of bullshit as I have ever smelled, Dutchie. Chapeau, mon ami! You have posted the silliest nonsense yet!!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: silentkisser

mandrill

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2001
76,541
88,162
113
was he being a dick? or everyone is a dick if they don't agree with your views?
If they're being a dick, yes.

If someone is being a dick, then a dick they are being.
 

Dutch Oven

Well-known member
Feb 12, 2019
6,996
2,483
113
I just wasted 4:21 of my life listening to a saggy old hack pseudo journo who dyes his hair orange telling the credulous that he has "an un named source" who claims that Busty jerks off to young girls while dressed in women's clothes.

Apparently, this only happened on 1 recorded instance and the un named source just happened to be there at the time. But the un named source apparently saw an unmistakable male erection under the fake boobage and skirt as Busty was sitting - not standing - there and despite the fact that the lights were dimmed and Busty wasn't sitting close to the "un named source" - at least not that we're told.

This is about as large a turd of bullshit as I have ever smelled, Dutchie. Chapeau, mon ami! You have posted the silliest nonsense yet!!!
Yes, the unnamed source "just happened to be" where their own daughter was. And you find that strange? Compared to creepy Lemieux being there with no child involved and no reason to be there?

And you think hard-ons are hard to spot? Under a tight skirt?

Your judgement is simply horrible. Menzies makes MUCH more sense than you do!
 
  • Haha
Reactions: silentkisser

silentkisser

Master of Disaster
Jun 10, 2008
4,328
5,428
113
Yes, the unnamed source "just happened to be" where their own daughter was. And you find that strange? Compared to creepy Lemieux being there with no child involved and no reason to be there?

And you think hard-ons are hard to spot? Under a tight skirt?

Your judgement is simply horrible. Menzies makes MUCH more sense than you do!
I'm not going to watch the Rebel...but, I guess my question is, if this "unnamed source" witnessed someone rubbing one out in public....why the fuck didn't they call the cops? Maybe I'm missing something here.

Now, all that being said, is this person a pervert? Probably not, but that won't stop the right from smearing them. I don't really care about this story. And it seems that only Menzies does, and of course Rebel's easily triggered right-wing audience.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: mitchell76

Dutch Oven

Well-known member
Feb 12, 2019
6,996
2,483
113
I'm not going to watch the Rebel...but, I guess my question is, if this "unnamed source" witnessed someone rubbing one out in public....why the fuck didn't they call the cops? Maybe I'm missing something here.
Of course you're missing something there, because you didn't/don't watch Rebel. The sequence of events is well explained in the video. Lemieux was confronted by parents and high-tailed it out of there.

Now, all that being said, is this person a pervert? Probably not, but that won't stop the right from smearing them. I don't really care about this story. And it seems that only Menzies does, and of course Rebel's easily triggered right-wing audience.
WTF? If "all that being said" includes watching little girls and getting sexually aroused - Yes - THAT MAKES HIM A PERVERT!
 
  • Like
Reactions: mitchell76
Toronto Escorts