Hot Pink List

Modi scolds Trudeau over Sikh protests in Canada against India

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
29,113
7,010
113
Yes he was a Separatist militant. That makes him a terrorist.

Yes he was a FOREIGN citizen. A foreign citizen who wants to break up India, is a non-state actor, and is engaged in war against the state of India. He therefore qualifies as an enemy combatant and as such can be killed by India in retaliation. Not saying India did it, but it would be justified for India to kill him.

Yes he was implicated in killings and other illegal activities and is a designated terrorist. India handed Canada a dossier on him. Canada ignored it. Given Canada has a history of not acting on credible intelligence, and then have it bite them in the ass, as in the case of Air India Flight 182, the Indian authorities are far more credible on this matter. Both because they know Khalistani terrorism and because they know the history.

Some details below: https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/har...acks-in-india-dossier-details-history-4416503

A foreign citizen does not have any rights to organize a referendum in India (or in any other country for that matter). Only the Indian govt. can and anyone else trying to is infact illegal and constitutes war against the state. There is no question of allowing a referendum in general, or any sort of partition of India anyway. If people are not happy to live under the tri-colour, as Indians, they are free to pack their bags and fuck off to wherever it is they want. India does not allow foreign interference like that. Infact in such cases, I support putting one right between the eyes (regardless of whether India actually did this or not).

The Sikhs in India will themselves not agree to it, and will never support Khalistanis. They identify as Indians and they don't even consider Canadian Khalistanis as real Sikhs.

Here is an Indian Sikh for example:
You are constantly quoting NDTV that has very close links with the Modi Government. Remember that Modi flew in the Adani Jet for his inauguration. Yes, this same Adani purchased the NDTV and some of the credible journalists resigned:

india-press-freedom-journalists-modi-bbc-documentary

The media in India has been increasingly censored on a constant basis. Why was the BBC documentary also banned in India, that is supposed to be the "Largest Democracy" in the world?

There are two sides to every story:

Many supporters of Khalistan in Canada maintain that the movement is peaceful, and that they have been a target of disinformation campaigns and harassment by India.
Other Sikhs have distanced themselves from the separatist movement and said that it does not represent the view of the majority of Sikhs in the country.
Ujjal Dosanjh, a Sikh Canadian and a former Premier of British Columbia, said in an interview with BBC Newsday that he does not believe Mr Nijjar was a prominent figure in the global Khalistan movement, calling him a "small fry".
Gurpreet Singh, a British Columbia-based journalist and radio host who has interviewed Mr Nijjar in the past, said he is sceptical of India's claims against the murdered Sikh leader.
"The Indian government has established that he was a terrorist, but on what basis? He was never convicted on any court of law. He has no criminal record in Canada," Mr Singh told the BBC.
The journalist, who describes himself as a secular Indian and who does not support the Khalistan movement, said he remembered Mr Nijjar as a "very soft spoken" person who was active in the local community.
"Nobody saw him spew venom against anyone or be angry," he said. "You may disagree with him on (Khalistan) ... but he had every right to ask for it."

Not sure if you are aware that there were also terrorist attacks in Northern Ireland. The mainland UK itself also suffered from the terrorist attacks by the IRA. The Catholics in Northern Ireland were victims of terrorist attacks by the opposing Protestant Ulster Unionists. Now, there were several IRA organized demonstrations etc in the USA. Some of the organizers in the USA were accused of feeding the terrorism, but we did not see similar killings orchestrated by the UK Government like that of Nijjar:


Today even Trudeau mentioned that the USA was going to bring this up with India. So who would I trust, India or the USA/Canada's allegations. Definitely not Modi!!
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
29,113
7,010
113
Watch this entire video. Khalistanis are terrorists. Someone killed Nijjar, and we have zero evidence India did.

But on a personal note, if India did do it, then Canada should be thanking India for getting rid of these terrorists. Infact, I would support offing each of these scumbags to make the world a better place. lol.

Of course that meeting with that Shamsher Singh will now be used as fodder for the cattle......LOL!!

This was a controversy from over 5 years ago when Jagmeet Singh's attendance at this Rally in the presence of Shamsher was revealed by the Globe and Mail. Jagmeet apologized at that time and condemned terrorism.

as-jagmeet-singh-condemns-terrorism-second-video-shows-him-speaking-alongside-sikh-separatist

India did not provide any credible evidence of Nijjar's actual involvement in the acts of terrorism. The Intel Services in Canada will take something like this very seriously.
Again if one thinks that they are living in a Nation that supports terrorism like Canada, then for their safety they should flee to a "Democratic Nation" like India where the journalism is supposed to be "Gospel Truth"!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Frankfooter

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,516
22,155
113
Well regardless of the hacking, they are still people who are able to understand the basic requirement of proof to reach a conclusion. Something loyal Trudeau foot soldiers don't seem to understand.
So India is hacking Canadian government sites and you still don't think there is any proof that India is interfering in Canada?
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,516
22,155
113
But on a personal note, if India did do it, then Canada should be thanking India for getting rid of these terrorists. Infact, I would support offing each of these scumbags to make the world a better place. lol.
We do not need immigrants offering to kill other Canadian immigrants.
 

Darts

Well-known member
Jan 15, 2017
23,023
11,217
113
You are constantly quoting NDTV that has very close links with the Modi Government. Remember that Modi flew in the Adani Jet for his inauguration. Yes, this same Adani purchased the NDTV and some of the credible journalists resigned:

india-press-freedom-journalists-modi-bbc-documentary

The media in India has been increasingly censored on a constant basis. Why was the BBC documentary also banned in India, that is supposed to be the "Largest Democracy" in the world?

There are two sides to every story:




Not sure if you are aware that there were also terrorist attacks in Northern Ireland. The mainland UK itself also suffered from the terrorist attacks by the IRA. The Catholics in Northern Ireland were victims of terrorist attacks by the opposing Protestant Ulster Unionists. Now, there were several IRA organized demonstrations etc in the USA. Some of the organizers in the USA were accused of feeding the terrorism, but we did not see similar killings orchestrated by the UK Government like that of Nijjar:


Today even Trudeau mentioned that the USA was going to bring this up with India. So who would I trust, India or the USA/Canada's allegations. Definitely not Modi!!
You are a great counterpoint to that overly biased poster who thinks India is the greatest country in the world and a Modi apologist.

Regarding Ireland, the U.K. government did send the SAS to assassinate IRA freedom fighters.
 

pavel bure

Active member
Apr 20, 2002
219
66
28
You are a great counterpoint to that overly biased poster who thinks India is the greatest country in the world and a Modi apologist.

Regarding Ireland, the U.K. government did send the SAS to assassinate IRA freedom fighters.
As far as I am aware the SAS was sent to Gibraltar to assassinate the IRA who entered Gibraltar on false identities and allegedly planned a car bomb attack on the British Forces stationed there.
 

Not getting younger

Well-known member
Jun 29, 2022
4,555
2,458
113
As far as I am aware the SAS was sent to Gibraltar to assassinate the IRA who entered Gibraltar on false identities and allegedly planned a car bomb attack on the British Forces stationed there.
IRA/UK

Great example of one persons terrorist being another persons freedom fighter.

While not taking either side despite my Irish lineage. I wonder how many people here, if the day came, and you had to fight a numerically and equipped superior army.

Would stand in a field of honour and trade volley fire. Play by anyone’s rules.
/boggle
 

Knuckle Ball

Well-known member
Oct 15, 2017
7,341
3,476
113
Some Sikhs in Punjab worry about pro-Khalistan sentiments from abroad
Two people sit on a couch.

Atamjeet Singh, left, sits with Sardoor Singh, right, one of his neighbours in the northern Indian state of Punjab, as they discuss the deepening tensions between Canada and India. (Salimah Shivji/CBC)
The conversation is rowdy at a home in a small village outside Amritsar, in India's northern state of Punjab, as paneer tikka and pakoras are passed around to the elders gathered, and it's dominated by the deepening tensions between India and Canada.

But every time the word "Khalistan" comes up, it's dismissed.

The dream of an independent Sikh homeland in northern India called Khalistan is at the heart of a diplomatic rift between the two countries, with the movement banned in India but enjoying some support in the Sikh diaspora.

Not so in Punjab, where much of the Sikh population feels as though the push for independence is far from their reality as the state deals with high unemployment and a crippling drug crisis.

Some Sikhs in the state now fear the increased attention on Khalistan, fuelled by the diaspora community, might make them targets of politicians hoping to stoke divides ahead of India's general election next year.

"When extremist [discourse] wins, it's always the general public that feels like it's exposed and vulnerable," said Kulvinder Singh, 58, one of the leaders of Sangna village.

A person rides a scooter on a rural road.

In Punjab’s rural countryside outside Amritsar, many are more worried about a high unemployment rate and a severe drug addiction crisis than fighting for an independent Sikh homeland. (Salimah Shivji/CBC)
Ramanpreet Kaur, 31, passing around tea to her guests, was also concerned that politicians are too quick to "pour oil on the Khalistan [issue], separating Hindus and Sikhs."

"It is wrong," she told CBC News.

The contentious issue has been the prime focus of discussion for many in Punjab, and in the wider media landscape across the South Asian country, since Prime Minister Justin Trudeau accused the government of India of having a hand in the killing of a Sikh separatist leader in British Columbia in June.

"What does it mean, what is Khalistan, really?" said Sardoor Singh, 78, as he sat with his neighbours and fretted over how the political tensions between his country and Canada would affect the Sikh minority in India.

A person sitting on a counch leans slightly forward.

Former police officer Naseeb Singh Sangna said hearing the word ‘Khalistan’ repeatedly in the media the past two weeks has reminded him of the ‘dark days’ of anti-Sikh violence in the 1980s when the Indian government quelled the separatist insurgency. (Salimah Shivji/CBC)
"We just believe that Sikhs should get justice."

While Singh said he doesn't believe in the fight for independence, he would like those who committed crimes against Sikhs in the past to be prosecuted.

That sentiment was echoed by Kaur, his granddaughter.

A person smiles and looks forward.

Ramanpreet Kaur criticized the 'people who are talking about Khalistan in Canada,' and said they should come to Punjab and see what the reality is. (Salimah Shivji/CBC)
"We don't want Khalistan. We want justice," said 31-year old Kaur, a lawyer who is pursuing a master's degree in criminology.

She said that the people of Punjab don't want a return to the violence and chaos of the 1980s, when the Khalistan movement was at its height.

"We just want our state to be peaceful."

WATCH | Many Sikhs in Punjab reject the idea of a separate Khalistan:
Why Sikhs in India fear Khalistan support is being exaggerated
On the streets of Punjab, many Sikhs reject the idea of a separate Khalistan and fear the idea is being exaggerated on social media. CBC’s South Asia correspondent Salimah Shivji breaks down why.
Thousands of people were killed when the Indian government initiated a crackdown to stifle the movement for an independent Sikh state, which had grown into an armed and violent insurgency in the 1970s and 1980s.

The crisis culminated in 1984, when Indian soldiers stormed the holy Golden Temple in Amritsar, after armed separatists had taken refuge inside. Operation Blue Star killed around 400 people, according to official figures, although Sikh groups believe the number is in the thousands.

Months later, deadly anti-Sikh riots erupted after the Indian prime minister who ordered the raid on the temple, Indira Gandhi, was assassinated by her Sikh bodyguards.

Lingering anger
Anger against the Indian government and its actions towards the Sikh minority, which makes up less than two per cent of the country's population, is still very present on the ground in the state, even decades later, along with the sense that Punjab has been slighted and not given its due.

One of the men at the village table, 65-year old Naseeb Singh Sangna, said he was serving as a police officer in the early 1980s and recalled "the dark days" of the religious riots.

He told CBC News that those outside Punjab who had not experienced that time could not fully understand how much trouble it caused to hear the word "Khalistan," even as he also expressed a wish the Indian government would give Punjab more autonomy.

Three people sit on a bench in the shade under a tree.

Many across the northern Indian state of Punjab have spent the past week and a half debating what will come next in the diplomatic spat between Canada and India, and many are anxious that ordinary Punjabis will be affected. (Salimah Shivji/CBC)
Still, "we definitely want to stay with India," Sangna said.

The worry for many whom CBC spoke to in Punjab is that as the movement for an independent Khalistan garners more attention globally, all Sikhs will be branded as terrorists.

The Indian government under Prime Minister Narendra Modi has increasingly warned of what it sees as a potential revival of separatist sentiment in Punjab, and that rhetoric has heated up online following the accusations from Canada.

Worry over rhetoric
The term "Khalistani" was also used by some in Modi's party, the BJP, in reference to the large-scale farmers' protests and unrest a few years ago, which eventually resulted in three controversial farm laws being overturned.

"Khalistan is a fantasy, a rhetorical nuisance," prominent Sikh journalist Hartosh Singh Bal, editor of Caravan Magazine, one of India's few independent publications, wrote on X, formerly known as Twitter, on Sept. 22.

But the heavily charged rhetoric online is a major worry for Kaur.

Two people take a selfie beside a body of water in front of a golden temple.

The Golden Temple is a major tourist destination in Amritsar. (Salimah Shivji/CBC)
"Politicians have a policy to divide and rule," she said. "They have an election ploy: Let's talk about Khalistan. Let's create a mess in the people," Kaur added, referring to India's general elections, set to take place by May 2024.

Kaur also criticized the "people who are talking about Khalistan in Canada," saying they should come to Punjab and see what the reality is.

"We are living here peacefully, why are you demanding Khalistan?" she said.

'Things have changed a lot'
According to retired political science professor Jagroop Singh Sekhon, a co-author of the book Terrorism in Punjab: Understanding Grassroots Reality, the Khalistan movement in Punjab "abruptly came to an end in 1992 or 1993."

But even though support among the general Sikh public in India collapsed decades ago, Sekhon said the diaspora has clung to a past that is no longer.

"There, they don't go by logic, sometimes they go by history. Some [think of] that glorious period that was there. But things have changed a lot," he said.

A person sits in front of lush greenery.

Retired political science professor Jagroop Singh Sekhon says that many in the younger generation in Punjab are focused on getting a visa to study abroad. (Salimah Shivji/CBC)
Not least of which is that the younger generation in Punjab is more aspirational, Sekhon said, with many putting all of their energy into securing a visa to study abroad, mostly in Canada, as a path towards permanent residency.

There may be no active insurgency in the state, but the Khalistan movement still has some support.

Kanwar Pal Singh is a longtime activist and one of the leaders of Dal Khalsa, a pro-independence group based in Amritsar. He spoke to CBC News in the group's small office filled with posters, some faded after so many years on the wall, with slogans like "Khalistan is our Birthright" and "Never Forget 1984."

The newest sign, printed in the past week, thanks Canada for "exposing brain behind killing of H.S. Nijjar."

A person sits in a chair in front of a wall with posters on it.

Kanwar Pal Singh, a longtime activist with the Dal Khalsa pro-independence group, is convinced that many of the supporters of Khalistan stay quiet about their political opinions out of a fear of repercussions from Indian authorities. (Salimah Shivji/CBC)
In Singh's view, support for Khalistan in the state is strong but silent.

"Over here, there is fear of a crackdown. There is fear of harassment. There is fear of being booked under draconian laws, which is not the case in Canada, the U.K. and U.S.A.," he said.

"Whatever we see in the diaspora [communities], that is a reflection of the movement in Punjab."

People sit along a wall beside a body of water with a golden temple in the background.

The Golden Temple in Amritsar is one of the holiest sites for the Sikh community. (Salimah Shivji/CBC)
But outside the Golden Temple, the site of so much violence in the fight for Khalistan four decades ago, Amanpal Singh firmly rejected the idea that the independence movement is thriving in the state.

"There is no Khalistan movement in Punjab. Nobody wants it," Singh, 40, told CBC News as he visited the temple with his wife and young child.

He said unemployment is the main issue that people in Punjab are focused on, and any renewed push for Sikh independence could easily disrupt the harmony of Hindus, Muslims and Sikhs living together peacefully.

That's why, he said, "I don't want to have any kind of Khalistan right now."

ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Salimah Shivji is CBC's South Asia correspondent, based in Mumbai. She has covered everything from natural disasters and conflicts, climate change to corruption across Canada and the world in her nearly two decades with the CBC.


 
  • Like
Reactions: Kautilya

Darts

Well-known member
Jan 15, 2017
23,023
11,217
113
"On the streets of Punjab, many Sikhs reject the idea of a separate Khalistan"
Most probably because they fear getting killed if they speak up.
 

Darts

Well-known member
Jan 15, 2017
23,023
11,217
113
IRA/UK

Great example of one persons terrorist being another persons freedom fighter.

While not taking either side despite my Irish lineage. I wonder how many people here, if the day came, and you had to fight a numerically and equipped superior army.

Would stand in a field of honour and trade volley fire. Play by anyone’s rules.
/boggle
Long story short. Ireland was invaded and occupied by the Orangemen. The IRA were resistance fighters who took the fight to the British homeland.

Freedom and rights are not freely granted but fought and won. Ukraine is a current example.

It is also why the Palestinians get some sympathy from the Irish. The problem is that the Palestinians turned down a two state solution which is the one favoured by the Irish.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,516
22,155
113
I agree. That is why the Khalistanis who actually killed Canadians and continue to engage in violence against Canadians and targeted killings of Indians, should either be banned or neutralized.
You're still here as an Indian immigrant defending and offering to support killing other Indian immigrants.

Hackers abound everywhere. So? And no that does not qualify as the state of India interfering in Canada. Next you will be claiming that scam calls from India qualify as interference. Lol.
You don't have a problem with likely Indian hackers targeting the government of Canada over investigating a political assassination?

I don't care who Jagmeet buddies around with. Jagmeet is a Khalistani sympathizer
Yes, we know what you think of Sikhs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bver_hunter

Anbarandy

Bitter House****
Apr 27, 2006
10,848
3,420
113
These idiots in Canada should live their lives as Canadians. lol.
Hmmm?

I know huh?

Any others that have but a physical footprint on Canadian soil while their minds, hearts and souls totally are coo-coo bananas for their homeland?

Think McFly, think.
 
Last edited:

Anbarandy

Bitter House****
Apr 27, 2006
10,848
3,420
113
Think McFly think? You should have before posting that.

There is a huge difference between wanting good things for both countries, and wanting to do damage to India, and in the process damaging Canada as well.

Identities are not created or erased by swapping passports. So I am both. Indian and Canadian.
Hello, hello McFly? Is anybody in there?

There is a mind-bending and gob smacking difference between proclaiming yourself an Indian and Canadian while actually being an:

INDIAN and Canadian.
 
Last edited:

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,516
22,155
113
I am supporting military action against terrorists.
No you're not, you were personally threatening violence against a separatist movement for a foreign country.

But on a personal note, if India did do it, then Canada should be thanking India for getting rid of these terrorists. Infact, I would support offing each of these scumbags to make the world a better place. lol.

You once again sound like the news.
Newly revealed threats against Sikh activists in Canada, U.S. boost urgency to solve Nijjar's death
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,516
22,155
113
No. I was supporting military action including and up to putting one between the eyes, of a militant, a separatist and a terrorist, that worked to kill people in India and possibly in Canada as well.

You on the other hand were JUSTIFYING murder of innocent civilians both in Canada and India in the name of "freedom of speech" and because "Trudeau said so". So think about who is personally threatening who. You are threatening Indians both in Canada and in India on behalf of terrorists. Not the other way around.

And that article doesn't say anything new than what we already knew. It just tells you that Nijjar was a goon and a terrorist and was probably threatened by his own rivals in Canada (and possibly killed by them as well). Nothing to do with India.
No, I'm supporting the rule of law, not justifying terrorism by Sikhs or Indians. CSIS should watch for terrorism by the Indian state as well as any other local political group, including Sikhs.
You are saying you support and would actively support political assassinations by a foreign country while living here as a Canadian.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bver_hunter

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
29,113
7,010
113
I don't care who Jagmeet buddies around with. Jagmeet is a Khalistani sympathizer so an apology doesn't cut it (although I did not read about one in that article, so not sure what you are talking about). We know those are his views as well. But it is the Khalistani's and their attitude that I am pointing out. Again, watch the video where Shamsher admits to targeted killings of 2700 police officers, a Chief Minister (Beant Singh), a PM (Indira Gandhi), and many other military officers and politicians these guys have killed over the years and continue to do today. Watch how he wants India to break up etc., Not that they are going to be successful but that is who they are. They are terrorists.

The Indian govt. dossier provided details on Nijjar's activities, including training in arms in Pakistan (Yeah, that's right bver_hunter). The Canadian govt. not taking it seriously is not new. They didn't back in 1985 and 329 people died. The govt. couldn't even vet a private citizen. So no, the intel services so far have only shown that they are incompetent or lethargic. India has more credibility in this matter.

Yes, Canada as of now is sheltering these terrorists purely for political convenience. So what should happen is either the terrorist group should be designated as one, or the terrorists need to be neutralized. As the Indian External Affairs Minister, S. Jaishankar said recently at the UNGA meeting, "Political convenience should not be allowed to determine a country's response to terrorism".

PS: By the way, its a funny thing. One of the reasons I supported NDP, was because of Jagmeet. I saw him as an Indian or a person of Indian origin, so figured he would understand immigrant issues better etc. I did not even pay attention to his Khalistani views. But now I know that he won't look at Indians the same way, as we do him and is instead buddying around with these cowardly dirtbags who don't have the balls to go to India to fight for what they say they truly believe in, but instead operate out of Canada and engage in terrorism. There is a reason why Sikhs in India don't even consider these Khalistanis real Sikhs.
How about Modi and his BJP's ties with the Hindu Fundamentalists who are calling for killings that are actually occurring and on the rise in India:

Hindu extremists in India escalate rhetoric with calls to kill Muslims
A petition filed to India’s Supreme Court said recent comments by Hindu nationalist leaders “amount to an open call for murder of an entire community.”

India’s Supreme Court says it will investigate after complaints that Hindu nationalist leaders called on followers to take up arms against the country’s Muslim minority.
The notice of investigation was issued last week to the northern state of Uttarakhand, where a Hindu nationalist conference in the city of Haridwar was attended by hundreds of right-wing activists.
“We must prepare to either kill or be killed,” one of the speakers, Swami Prabodhananda Giri, said at the three-day conference, which was held Dec. 17-19.
Anti-Muslim sentiment has been rising in Hindu-majority India under Prime Minister Narendra Modi, a Hindu nationalist. But recent calls to violence are shocking in their extremity, experts say, going beyond hate speech to advocate ethnic cleansing.
No arrests have been made in either Haridwar or Delhi, and the Modi government has not commented. The official silence, critics say, could be interpreted by Hindu nationalists as a tacit endorsement.

“To give speeches against us and to say you want to drive out an entire population based on their religion, I don’t understand how they can ignore this,” said Maulana Mahmood Madani, president of Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind, which describes itself as India’s largest Muslim organization.

Since Modi consolidated power with his re-election in 2014, Muslims in India — who make up about 14 percent of the population, have faced increased violence, discrimination and government persecution. Attacks from Hindu nationalists have ranged from property destruction and the disruption of religious services to deadly lynch mobs.

So tell us why Swami is not being arrested for calling for acts of terrorism on the Muslims? Here we actually know that more Muslims were killed as a result.

The actual acts of terrorisms today in India are perpetrated by these extreme elements. Contrast that with what is occurring in Canada today. We are not seeing it and if it is happening please post the actual evidence and not WION.........Modi's mouthpiece's take on their opinion while they deny that the violence and killings against Muslims and more recently Christians are a daily occurrence. You are constantly talking about the downing of the Air India jet by those real terrorists. We condemned it and am glad that those responsible are either paying the price or are in jail. However, Sikhs calls for separation is does not mean that it automatically has to be designated as an act of "terrorism". We have seen that in Quebec where there were violence incidents, however the referendums went ahead and the rule of democracy prevailed. Modi will never have a referendum as he wants to govern more like an autocrat, and I have no doubt that he gave the green signal for the killing of Nijjar. That is why they do not want to co-operate in this investigation but just deny it.
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
29,113
7,010
113
India: Sikhs protest in Amritsar after Canada's allegations
Sikhs gathered outside the Golden Temple in Amritsar demanding punishment for the killers of a Sikh separatist in Canada. Meanwhile, India's foreign minister said he'd discussed the issue during his trip to the US.

Hundreds of Sikh activists on Friday staged a demonstration outside the Golden Temple in Amritsar, in the northern Indian state of Punjab, demanding punishment for the killers of a Sikh separatist shot dead in Canada.

What issue were they protesting?
Hardeep Singh Nijjar was shot and killed in July this year in the parking lot of a Sikh temple in British Columbia, a quarter of a century after he left India following the death of his father, also a Sikh separatist leader.

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau earlier this month told parliament that there may be a link between the Indian government and the murder. Nijjar had been declared a terror suspect by India in 2020.

This prompted stern responses from India, which described Ottawa's allegations and plans for an investigation as "absurd."

Narendra Modi's Hindu-nationalist government temporarily suspended visa processing for Canadiansand issued a travel warning either for Indians in Canada or people planning a trip there, seemingly in response to the accusations. Both countries sent a diplomat home, in a tit-for-tat move.

Canada has not yet provided any evidence to back up its suspicion, but Trudeau did say when challenged that his government's decision to make its suspicions public was not "taken lightly."

The country is home to both a large Indian diaspora and a large Sikh community that emigrated from India.

Demonstration at Sikhism' holiest site
Holding posters of Nijjar, and placards often with English language slogans, the protesters called on Delhi to stop extrajudicial operations against separatists seeking an independent state in Punjab or part of that majority-Sikh region that spans India's border with Pakistan.

"It is time and opportunity for New Delhi to talk with Sikh leadership," said Paramjit Singh Mand, a leader of Dal Khalsa, the group, which is advocating for a separate Sikh homeland and organized the protest.

Sikhs make up just under 2% of India's population, according to the government's most recent census, with Sikhism the country's fourth most prevalent religion after Hinduism, Islam and Christianity. However, Sikhs also make up the majority of the population in the Punjab area of northern India and southern Pakistan. Some seek an independent nation known as Khalistan, to be located on some or all of this territory.

Canada's allegations, and the stern response from New Delhi, thrust an often forgotten issue back into an international spotlight several weeks after Nijjar's death passed with only relatively muted coverage outside Canada.

"We thank the Canadian government for exposing the Indian design, how India is operating on foreign soil, intervening in Canadian affairs," said Kanwar Pal, political affairs secretary of the group.

Indian foreign minister says he raised the issue during US visit
Meanwhile, Indian Foreign Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar was just south of Canada's borders on Friday, visiting Washington DC.

He said that he had discussed the issue with US State Secretary Anthony Blinken and US National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan during his visit.

Speaking at an event at the Hudson Institute think tank, Jaishankar said, "They shared US views and assessments on this whole situation, and I explained to them at some length ... a summary of the concerns which I had."

 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
29,113
7,010
113
Irrelevant to the discussion. Atleast the Supreme Court says it will investigate these allegations. Not so in Pakistan where your majority Sunni muslims routinely slaughter, Hindus, Christians, Sikhs and other Muslim minorities.

Go fix your Pakistan first.
Goes to show how your "facts" are 100% wrong as I have nothing to do with Pakistan and rate them lower than India for now where democracy is concerned. You are fixated on that myth about me and are defending the real terrorist sympathizer called Modi!!

He has everything to do with this whole case as he had his finger in this whole affair with the ordering of the killing of Nijjar. Now you better go to your temple to pray for his "innocence"!!
 
Toronto Escorts