Climate Change

Addict2sex

Well-known member
Jan 29, 2017
2,463
1,278
113
I love the chart. I'm sure its posted to make science look too complex to understand but all it does is point out larue's ignorance.
But even better is the 0.01% change comment.

NASA has a pinned tweet for ignorant people who make stupid claims about trace amounts of elements.
The other week on the front page of Toronto Sun - new Mayor Olivia Chow

'We’re talking about banning leaf blowers and weed whackers at City Hall, can the demands to ban gas stoves and wood fired pizza ovens be far behind? Welcome to the new City Hall, where thanks to Olivia Chow’s election win last week, progressive councillors and the even more progressive staffers will feel emboldened.'

https://torontosun.com/opinion/columnists/under-chow-expect-council-to-focus-on-everything-but-you
 

Addict2sex

Well-known member
Jan 29, 2017
2,463
1,278
113


Growing food causes climate change ✅️
Breathing people causes climate change ✅️
Un-suffering people cause climate change ✅️
Humanity is their target 💀

PS. Endless war helps the fight against climate change and will counteract the ill effects of eating and breathing, and
no, nuclear winter is not climate change
 

Addict2sex

Well-known member
Jan 29, 2017
2,463
1,278
113
Wait, now we're moving the goalposts?

So you can't be alarmist about climate change, but you also have to convince governments to act.

But only through certain, approved chanels. But ALSO go on climate strike, but like, don't be alarmist about it.

Strike Quietly? Is that what you're trying to say here?

Dude, I'm just here for the titties, and a hope that future generations will be able to walk into an air conditioned building and also touch some stranger's titties.
What is this "Climate Alarmism" that the far right Climate Change Deniers seems to harp on a constant basis?
Lets get real as this Climate Change is reality that somehow needs to be addressed. Especially, as these forest fires from the record warm temperatures as early as May, is unearthing more and more Canadians from their homes, especially for now those residing in Alberta and even BC. The fact is that Climate Change Deniers must come to some common sense and look to a Greener and less Green House Gas Emission Future, rather than building and rebuilding more and more pipelines that no one wants in their own backyards. (NIMBY). They are okay if these pipelines are built in the lands designated for the Indigenous Community who are opposed to it. They have had to put up with spillages and contaminated water over the decades!!

Sure you should go and sue whoever you feel is not implementing these policies in a more concise manner!!
Oh, but @boobtoucher , if you can, stay long enough for LaRue to short circuit into repeating the same meme or quote again and again like a broken robot.
It's kind of hilarious the first time you see it.
Johnny Larue you know I love you like a brother but Jeez-o-Pete's can you spew the bullshit.

Keep believing your own bullshit! Here more facts! One day you will wake up and realized you been lied to! You only a pleb to serve the WEF globalist . The pleb like you only serve a purpose…being a good usefulness commie idiot pushing their agenda 2030 until your usefulness is no longer needEd then you will be jail or executed or a pleb eating a bug for dinner when CBDC arrived !



On Friday evening, The Wall Street Journal published an op-ed by Milloy titled "Hottest Days Ever? Don't Believe It."

"One obvious problem with the updated narrative is that there are no satellite data from 125,000 years ago. Calculated estimates of current temperatures can't be fairly compared with guesses of global temperature from thousands of years ago," Milloy wrote.
Despite concerns about the model's reliability, Axios' Thursday headline read, "Earth sees three hottest days on record," while Bloomberg ran with "The World Recorded Its Hottest Days Ever This Week."

Heads of the global warming industry have spent the last three decades frantically running around the globe in private jets, prophesying how the world would imminently end because of emissions from fossil fuel engines.

Al Gore





Michael Bloomberg





In 2018, remember, climate alarmist child Greta Thunburg tweeted some 'scientist' who claimed "all of humanity" would be "wiped out" unless "we stop using fossil fuels over the next five years."


We're still typing and using fossil fuels -- the world has not ended.








Full disclosure we ( conservatives) don't discount climate change because the climate has been constantly changing for 4.54 billion years.

Last week was a media blitz campaign by the global warming industry to push 'misinformation' with a model that even NOAA has warned is not dependable.
 
Last edited:

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
90,512
21,748
113
Keep believing your own bullshit! Here more facts! One day you will wake up and realized you been lied to! You only a pleb to serve the WEF globalist . The pleb like you only serve a purpose…being a good usefulness commie idiot pushing their agenda 2030 until your usefulness is no longer needEd then you will be jail or executed or a pleb eating a bug for dinner when CBDC arrived !



On Friday evening, The Wall Street Journal published an op-ed by Milloy titled "Hottest Days Ever? Don't Believe It."


Despite concerns about the model's reliability, Axios' Thursday headline read, "Earth sees three hottest days on record," while Bloomberg ran with "The World Recorded Its Hottest Days Ever This Week."

Heads of the global warming industry have spent the last three decades frantically running around the globe in private jets, prophesying how the world would imminently end because of emissions from fossil fuel engines.

Al Gore





Michael Bloomberg





In 2018, remember, climate alarmist child Greta Thunburg tweeted some 'scientist' who claimed "all of humanity" would be "wiped out" unless "we stop using fossil fuels over the next five years."


We're still typing and using fossil fuels -- the world has not ended. Last week, we noted, "New Month, Another Movement: Corporate Media Refocuses Energy On Climate Doom."








Full disclosure we ( conservatives) don't discount climate change because the climate has been constantly changing for 4.54 billion years.

Last week was a media blitz campaign by the global warming industry to push 'misinformation' with a model that even NOAA has warned is not dependable.
Wrong.

Global land surface temp records:

Global see temps

 
  • Like
Reactions: mandrill

Addict2sex

Well-known member
Jan 29, 2017
2,463
1,278
113
What is this "Climate Alarmism" that the far right Climate Change Deniers seems to harp on a constant basis?
Lets get real as this Climate Change is reality that somehow needs to be addressed. Especially, as these forest fires from the record warm temperatures as early as May, is unearthing more and more Canadians from their homes, especially for now those residing in Alberta and even BC. The fact is that Climate Change Deniers must come to some common sense and look to a Greener and less Green House Gas Emission Future, rather than building and rebuilding more and more pipelines that no one wants in their own backyards. (NIMBY). They are okay if these pipelines are built in the lands designated for the Indigenous Community who are opposed to it. They have had to put up with spillages and contaminated water over the decades!!

Sure you should go and sue whoever you feel is not implementing these policies in a more concise manner!!
Oh, but @boobtoucher , if you can, stay long enough for LaRue to short circuit into repeating the same meme or quote again and again like a broken robot.
It's kind of hilarious the first time you see it.
Johnny Larue you know I love you like a brother but Jeez-o-Pete's can you spew the bullshit.


THe White House published a new report Friday, July 2, 2023 indicating that the Biden administration wants to manipulate planetary systems to block the sunlight to save the planet.

The congressionally mandated report released by the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy shows the Biden administration is very eager to explore "geoengineering" methods to block sunlight because they allege the planet is burning and there's an imminent climate crisis that will destroy the world.

A program of research into the scientific and societal implications of solar radiation modification (SRM) would enable better-informed decisions about the potential risks and benefits of SRM as a component of climate policy, alongside the foundational elements of greenhouse gas emissions mitigation and adaptation," the White House report said.
The report continued, "SRM offers the possibility of cooling the planet significantly on a timescale of a few years."


In a statement, the White House said, "There are no plans underway to establish a comprehensive research program focused on solar radiation modification."



An increasing number of climate alarmists who trust "global warming science" have pitched the idea of large-scale interventions such as solar engineering to reverse 'climate change.' They believe human activity is the sole reason for the Earth's increase in temperature and say large-scale intervention is immediately needed to stop the planet's destruction. Some have even called for fleets of planes to spray chemicals into the atmosphere to deflect the sun's rays as the world's last hope for survival.



Meanwhile, scientists from Harvard University have called for "spraying tiny particles called sulfate aerosols into the atmosphere to reflect away sunlight." And MIT recently wrote, "Geoengineering might be our final and only option."

Speaking to reporters Frans Timmermans, the European Union climate policy chief, said, "Nobody should be conducting experiments alone with our shared planet" and "This should be discussed in the right forum, at the highest international level."



European leaders are worried that geoengineering experiments could go horribly wrong if unchecked. The risks of manipulating Earth's climate need to be better understood, and necessary rules and procedures are needed.

The European Commission outlined the potential risks and” unintended consequences ” of manipulating planetary systems to fight global warming.

The commission warned:

In the context of accelerated global warming, deliberate large-scale intervention in the Earth's natural systems (referred to as "geoengineering"), such as solar radiation modification, is attracting more attention. However, the risks, impacts and unintended consequences that these technologies pose are poorly understood, and necessary rules, procedures and institutions have not been developed.
Some of these risks include:

These technologies introduce new risks to people and ecosystems, while they could also increase power imbalances between nations, spark conflicts and raises a myriad of ethical, legal, governance and political issues.
Blocking the sun's rays globally with artificial particles in the name of 'climate change' is gaining traction. However, there's too much risk involved that could possibly harm biodiversity and agriculture on a global scale. THE fact that this technology could alter global weather patterns and the Biden administration wants to explore it -- is frightening~~~> . SEE REPORT HERE.


PS. What can go wrong?? :eek: Believe the fake data manipulation of science push by the WEF and the neoliberals ! Remember the lies told by governments like IRAQ WMD or COVID-19 is not airborne, or if you get vaccinated you won’t get covid19 pushed by pharmaceutical industries or spread to other by Fauci, or lockdowns of school pushed local & state governments.
 
Last edited:

y2kmark

Class of 69...
May 19, 2002
19,064
5,440
113
Lewiston, NY
The other week on the front page of Toronto Sun - new Mayor Olivia Chow

'We’re talking about banning leaf blowers and weed whackers at City Hall, can the demands to ban gas stoves and wood fired pizza ovens be far behind? Welcome to the new City Hall, where thanks to Olivia Chow’s election win last week, progressive councillors and the even more progressive staffers will feel emboldened.'

https://torontosun.com/opinion/columnists/under-chow-expect-council-to-focus-on-everything-but-you
Well, leaf blowers and weed whackers work better as electric. Those two stroke engines are double bad news. Wood fired anything uses the fossil fuel with the highest pollutant to energy ratio. Aren't the Campfire Girls supposed to change their name???
 
  • Like
Reactions: Frankfooter

mandrill

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2001
75,647
84,433
113

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
90,512
21,748
113
Anyone know the origin of this meme?
I'm curious to see if it holds up to any scrutiny at all.
Its from a German station that used to post its weather forecasts just as numbers over a green background but then added in colour to match temperatures years later.
So of course its not what larue claims.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Valcazar

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
16,872
2,582
113
I don't have to prove a thing Sweet Larue, it is you that has to pry his head out of the piscadur.
wrong again
it is you who is demanding massive economic & societal change be imposed on others to solve a non-problem driven by propaganda & pseudoscience
so it is you who needs to provide evidence to back up your claims
Here's your evidence @ 4:08!

your evidence has the same value as the spoonful of intestinal gravy, which he dropped into his shorts @ 4:08!
 

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
32,546
60,127
113
In 2018, remember, climate alarmist child Greta Thunburg tweeted some 'scientist' who claimed "all of humanity" would be "wiped out" unless "we stop using fossil fuels over the next five years."

I've always found the reliance on these sorts of deliberate misreadings fascinating.
I can never decide if it is the people making the memes being dumb or the people making the memes counting on their audience being dumb.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
90,512
21,748
113
I've always found the reliance on these sorts of deliberate misreadings fascinating.
I can never decide if it is the people making the memes being dumb or the people making the memes counting on their audience being dumb.
I suspect its people from the oil&gas industry preaching to idiots.
The same lobbyists/disinformation types that used to support the tobacco industry.
 

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
16,872
2,582
113
Anyone know the origin of this meme?
I'm curious to see if it holds up to any scrutiny at all.

sure
did you think I was not expecting this to be asked?
Posts mislead on German weather map colors, climate change | Fact Check (afp.com)
they fact checked the claim
German TV program's weather maps from 2017 and 2022 to claim it now uses more vivid colors to exaggerate heat and the effects of climate change. This is misleading; the channel said it adopted a more accessible format that uses color, not just numbers, to reflect daily temperatures.

however they also confirm the temperature to be accurate for those days in 2017 & 2022

HR spokesperson Sabine Renken said in a July 27, 2022 email that, until the end of 2019, weather forecasts for Tagesthemen were prepared externally.

She told AFP: "The supplied temperature maps in the Tagesthemen session showed the temperature exclusively in numbers," with a green background regardless of temperature.
how can one pretend this is not subliminal influencing ?
the photo are accurate and produce the same subliminal reaction that cause you to question their origin
you immediately thought how could 2017 be warmer than 2020 as 2020 is all red ?

how can one pretend the red color does not create a subliminal image of heat
how can one pretend this was not intentional ?

mis-information via a damn fool mistake?
I do not think so
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: Valcazar

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
16,872
2,582
113
It's actually a stroke of genius. I mean, what destroys the environment more than the methane that grazing meat animals emit?....

what is the concentration of methane in the atmosphere ?
i bet you do not have a clue
i also bet you have no concept of how insignificant that miniscule amount is
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
90,512
21,748
113
sure
did you think I was not expecting this to be asked?
Posts mislead on German weather map colors, climate change | Fact Check (afp.com)
they fact checked the claim
German TV program's weather maps from 2017 and 2022 to claim it now uses more vivid colors to exaggerate heat and the effects of climate change. This is misleading; the channel said it adopted a more accessible format that uses color, not just numbers, to reflect daily temperatures.

however they also confirm the temperature to be accurate for those days in 2017 & 2022

HR spokesperson Sabine Renken said in a July 27, 2022 email that, until the end of 2019, weather forecasts for Tagesthemen were prepared externally.

She told AFP: "The supplied temperature maps in the Tagesthemen session showed the temperature exclusively in numbers," with a green background regardless of temperature.

how can one pretend this is not subliminal influencing ?
how can one pretend this was not intentional ?

mis-information via a damn fool mistake?
I do not think so
Adding in colour is 'intentionally' 'misleading' to you?
Wow.

And that would make this article....?
 

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
32,546
60,127
113
sure
did you think I was not expecting this to be asked?
Posts mislead on German weather map colors, climate change | Fact Check (afp.com)
they fact checked the claim
German TV program's weather maps from 2017 and 2022 to claim it now uses more vivid colors to exaggerate heat and the effects of climate change. This is misleading; the channel said it adopted a more accessible format that uses color, not just numbers, to reflect daily temperatures.

however they also confirm the temperature to be accurate for those days in 2017 & 2022



how can one pretend this is not subliminal influencing ?
the photo are accurate and produce the same subliminal reaction that cause you to question their origin
you immediately thought how could 2017 be warmer than 2020 as 2020 is all red ?

how can one pretend the red color does not create a subliminal image of heat
how can one pretend this was not intentional ?

mis-information via a damn fool mistake?
I do not think so
Aww, you're adorable.
Just a wall of unfalsifiable "I know it is true" theorizing about the evil conspiracy.
 

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
16,872
2,582
113
Aww, you're adorable.
Just a wall of unfalsifiable "I know it is true" theorizing about the evil conspiracy.
do not tell me you did not immediately think 2020 must be hotter than 2017 when you saw the image's
subliminal advertising is nothing new. this was intentional

the evil conspiracy. ... you can blame Michael Mann for that
polar bears, hockey sticks, acidification of the oceans, barrier reef bleaching , sea level rise, more hurricanes, tornados & more wildfires
all climate alarmism fabrications which have been proven false
The climate alarmists will promote any misleading story so long as it scares the public. Absolutly despicable behavior
if you want to call it the evil conspiracy., that is your choice, but do not think for a second, this intentional misleading of the publics is not occurring
there is nothing adorable about it.
what is wrong with you ??
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Valcazar
Toronto Escorts