I would listen to Shapiro talk about anything like I would listen to my turds talk about anything.....
Jordan Peterson says Ontario psychologist licence may be suspended over public statements
- Thread starter Knuckle Ball
- Start date
Many of us enjoy listening to your turds here.
You won't have to wait long. This Congresswoman is on the case.
No, Wyatt, its not double talk.
This has happened in other threads where you've stated you won't read legit sources that are handed to you.
You did it again in this thread.
You were given the CPO statements, multiple quotes and references from Peterson's tweets and statements.
Your response was 'Are you trying to say it's wrong to ask questions of authority?'
I'd say asking questions when you've been given the answers to your questions repeatedly is just a reminder that you refuse to check anything that runs against your own confirmation bias.
Seriously?!?!.... Dinesh?!?!?!....
The dude who did the ludicrous "200 Mules" dum-dum movie?!
That and the Shapiro shit is just proof that these assholes grift together and use each other's stunts to grift further. The issue with Doc Pee is he's no longer a legit professional. He's joined ranks with the liars and simp-milkers.
Well, this isn't the issue currently before them, is it?
And anyway the meme is wrong and the CPO takes a different view.
Well, what would you call it?Yeah! She's a grifter!!
I could surf Tiktok and look for dumbass Proud Boy and Oathkeeper types and hardcore anti vaxxers and post them in a silly thread on TERB and call it a silly name..... and I do.
But I wouldn't suggest it's mainstream GOP / right of centre thinking. (Most Republicans don't quite yet publicly state that they believe the Lizard-aliens run America. Although who knows, give it a couple of years.... )
I suppose you can dismiss decades of studies on the internet if it doesn't fit your worldview.Oh look!... A morning talk show pretending to be science!
Unlike Frank's line of reasoning above, I also referenced the key point out of the video so one didn't have to sit through a video clip. In any event, the woman cites Gallup.`Perhaps she's making it all up for television.
Last edited:
mandrill is of the persuasion that men and women are identical in all respects other than physical strength.
Temperament, personality, interests, mating strategies, are identical.
Of course, his position is nonsense, but first hand experience and scientific data won't move change his opinion. These well established differences manifest themselves in the job market, academics, dating market, relationships, law, and every facet of life. But it's ideologically essential for him to be right, even when he's obviously wrong.
Temperament, personality, interests, mating strategies, are identical.
Of course, his position is nonsense, but first hand experience and scientific data won't move change his opinion. These well established differences manifest themselves in the job market, academics, dating market, relationships, law, and every facet of life. But it's ideologically essential for him to be right, even when he's obviously wrong.
Last edited:
From which she derives a significant income. And which is presented under false pretences. But it's not grifting. Of course not.
There are truth seekers who are curious about the world and how it works no matter where that takes them. Then there are truth keepers who believe they know and defend the truth. No one fits into one category all the time, but you do see the dominant characteristics in some.
Truth keepers can also come at things from right wing dogma. Several of the posters labeled "right wing" here are fairly pragmatic in my opinion. Truth keepers don't care for pragmatism either. In the TERB stew, pragmatists just interfere with the truth.
Truth keeping seems like an oppressive burden to shoulder while navigating this world.
Last edited:
Okay fine. If I use that definition, then I would say Rachel Maddow is a grifter. I don't mind if you mention Tucker Carlson.
I still think Rachel and Tucker are simply entertainers, but a lot of people take them at face value.
By the way, did anyone see that CNN is considering replacing their prime time line-up with a comedic news program?
CNN... that's a network I haven't heard about in awhile.
But I have to give them their due. Something remarkable happened recently. I saw one of the dumbest "news" hosts, Don Lemon, actually be truthful for once. Is he still on CNN? If he keeps talking like he did in this clip, he might get fired.
But I have to give them their due. Something remarkable happened recently. I saw one of the dumbest "news" hosts, Don Lemon, actually be truthful for once. Is he still on CNN? If he keeps talking like he did in this clip, he might get fired.
A truth seeker would have checked out the CPO findings, standards and comments directly and without people feeding them links here.
A truth keeper would believe they know the truth and don't need outside confirmations like facts or evidence. Which makes them more 'faith based'.
I'm curious. Does anyone suspect that some of the progressive members have more than one handle here on TERB?
I've noticed that in the last several months some progressive newcomers have emerged and often they sound exactly like well-known established members. Now that would be a potential ban on MERB and other sites. Here on TERB it's pretty much anything goes.
One might ask why would anyone bother. It's simple. The echo chamber gets bigger and louder.
I've noticed that in the last several months some progressive newcomers have emerged and often they sound exactly like well-known established members. Now that would be a potential ban on MERB and other sites. Here on TERB it's pretty much anything goes.
One might ask why would anyone bother. It's simple. The echo chamber gets bigger and louder.
Last edited:
Some of the people on this thread should be checked out by Jordan Peterson.
To much sea lioning.
To much sea lioning.
