Given how wrong you are, I can only assume it is personal or partisan bias.
Jordan Peterson says Ontario psychologist licence may be suspended over public statements
- Thread starter Knuckle Ball
- Start date
To be fair, the modern use of the word "stoic" isn't the same as the traditional philosophical school.
Jordan isn't that, either, but I did just want to point that out.
Last edited:
Classic Dr. Peterson at Oxford....Watch it at your peril.....Is this what the left calls misogynistic?
And I know you're going to find some clips where he is crying but they are a small scintilla of his interviews or videos.
He is angry, than crying, most of the times. Thats why he is emotional.
I dont care much about JP. Some of what he says is okay. I just consider him a grifter.
Tate on the other hand.....
You are correct. I have read his last two books and can confirm he lives up to all of his rules.
Glad we got that cleared up....
There's that word again.....When on the attack....Default to calling your foe a ''grifter''.
Think hard on this one. Is there anybody that you disagree with politically that isn't a ''grifter''?
Depends on the person.
I disagree with Greta Thunberg on climate change for example. I dont consider her a grifter.
LOL......Jeez Louise even I would call her that. I don't think I ever have said that though but I think about it.
I figure she's on the spectrum though and is just being manipulated so move on from her.
Oh please.
You are trying to tell me that this man lives up to: 6, 8 9 or 10?
I could probably argue for more, but these will do.
That's my point... there is a lot to disagree about when there is no way of clearly deciding what is true. Malpractice is defined by a group of people who believe there is a right way, professional standards are agreed upon by a group of people, regardless of who decides what is right, it doesn't mean that it's right, just that it's agreed upon, That's why we have concepts like academic freedom and the freedom of speech, just because one groups beliefs are hegemonic doesn't mean they are right or true, hence controversy, debate and dialogue may lead to a better set of beliefs. Until someone then challenge's those beliefs and perhaps a new paradigm establishes itself. Sanctioning and silencing someone for their beliefs prevents or delays this from happening at worst and can lead to horrendous violence. Today's belief will one day be viewed as wrong-headed, superstitious or another example of group hysteria. A little humbleness on the part of everyone might lead to a better outcome. I'm no friend of any group that believes they know what is true, especially when it comes to human affairs. If you don't believe me, then read some of the books that Peterson suggests or speak to people who have lived in countries that have repressive or authoritarian regimes.
Personally, I've had my fill of interacting with fanatics who will forcefully assert all manner of nonsense and then try to force me into believing that 2+2=5
Believe what you want to believe but allow me to believe what I want to believe and lets agree to disagree if that's the best we can do.
Translation: I'm a partisan hack. I can't admit that JP is an outstanding highly intelligent person whose views I agree with. But to stay safely within my predefined political sphere I'll attack him by calling him emotional and pretend that he is weak for crying. Then I'll use the penultimate label that will really get hi-fives from my side of the political aisle... I'll call him a grifter.
Tate doesn't cry and is descended directly from a genius (his father). He's also a big guy and athletic. I have to pull out the big guns to shut him down or I might be seen as sympathetic to him by my peers. Therefore, with no evidence produced, he's a misogynist, trafficker, abuser, and pimp.
Finally, I detest incels. I hate them. I don't even know why but I do because the media told me to. The media says they're subhuman scum, so that's what they are. The media also told me that incels are somehow linked to JP and AT, therefore I must ensure I hate them passionately.
Don't squeeze one out while you're in there.Dammit, I agree with all of this. Excuse me, I have to go shower!!!!
JP might call this stupid, and he'd be right:
The people that complain about patriarchy, safe spaces for women, and mansplaining will defend men like this running and taking over women's spaces in sport, education, employment, and entertainment lol.
Men keep winning, in any shape or form they take.
The people that complain about patriarchy, safe spaces for women, and mansplaining will defend men like this running and taking over women's spaces in sport, education, employment, and entertainment lol.
Men keep winning, in any shape or form they take.
Last edited:
LOL........Is this the evening gown round?
What's interesting is when you talk to people in daily life, all of them find this woke stuff absurd.
It's only online in places like TERB and Twitter where you have these packs of weirdos that come out in full force defending this garbage. Even on Facebook, you'll get laugh mocking emojis on stories like this because everyone recognizes how stupid it is.
But again, on TERB you'll have people fighting tooth and nail trying to convince you that this is progress and should be normalized.
It's only online in places like TERB and Twitter where you have these packs of weirdos that come out in full force defending this garbage. Even on Facebook, you'll get laugh mocking emojis on stories like this because everyone recognizes how stupid it is.
But again, on TERB you'll have people fighting tooth and nail trying to convince you that this is progress and should be normalized.
Last edited:
Not true. We know exactly what Peterson has said in his Tweets and YOUTUBE videos.
Yes. That’s how a professional college works. It exists to protect the public and prevent “snake oil salesmen” from engaging in practice that may harm the public and/or bring the profession into disrepute
The College’ response to what you are saying would be that their role is to protect the public from crackpots who dispense unprofessional advice that contradicts the college’s standards and practices and may cause harm to the community.
If you wish to be a member of any professional college it means that you are buying into the way they do things and practice accordingly. If you want to be a “free thinker” and spout off anything that you wish then you can’t be part of the college.
Last edited:
Thats a pretty long translation for a two liner. Are you sure its a translation and not just you ranting and regurgitating the same shit over and over again, despite evidence to the contrary?
