By telling him that he can't say certain things publicly and that he should take special courses too teach him what and how he should speak next time.
That's how.
Last edited:
Jordan Peterson says Ontario psychologist licence may be suspended over public statements
- Thread starter Knuckle Ball
- Start date
That's how.
They are saying he can say what he wants to say, but contend that it violates their code of conduct. That's very different from what you are claiming. Freedom of speech doesn't equal freedom from consequences.
He is facing consequences for allegedly violating the code of conduct. Not for his speech per se. Those are very different things.
It will be interesting to see what exactly did he say that violated the code of conduct.
Read Jordan Peterson's tweets that prompted complaints to psychologists' college
Jordan Peterson posted a document online that detailed a number of the complaints made against his conduct. Read the full document here
nationalpost.com
It's laughable really....
It is laughable.Read Jordan Peterson's tweets that prompted complaints to psychologists' college
Jordan Peterson posted a document online that detailed a number of the complaints made against his conduct. Read the full document here
It's laughable really....
The woke believe that all psychologists should think the same way.
In fact the woke believe that we all should think like them.
This is a move by psychologists, not the 'woke'.
How many times do we have to repeat this?
Peterson is free to tell his incel supporters about the 'horrors' of masturbation.
But not as an acting psychologist, who would think this a total nutso position.
Yep there you go. Just like fact checkers on these sites cancelling people out for spreading so called covid misinformation didn't have any medical backgrounds.Yes, a lot of the CPO discipline committee are just public citizens.
Committees – CPBAO Public
cpo.on.ca
It just turns out to be a merry-go-round of woke ideology.
Academia today has a lefty bias. This is well known and the lefties are always quick to point it out to everyone, except when it becomes inconvenient.
Of course Academia has a leftist bias. Academics go through rigorous training in factual analysis, logic and moral issues.
Interesting, I didn't expect you to push a "Peterson is backed by shadowy money with a political agenda" conspiracy here.
and indoctrination which now they want to force on others
I just started watching this and it makes no sense. What is he talking about? Feeling guilty after masturbation? if one feels like feeling guilty after ejaculation one can feel guilty about each and every kind of it. Why not feel guilty if you got to your ejaculation through simping, like kissing your wife’s ass? Or if you are a “top G” why not feel guilty knowing that you have used a young woman who did it know better? If you paid for sex why not feel guilty about wasting money?
phd my ass lol
Rigorous with respect to ideological indoctrination, yes.
Of course.
Since various freedoms come into conflict, one of the major roles of society is about negotiating how those freedoms are limited and under what circumstances.
I'm curious how he will reply.
He's talking about guys who are addicted to porn and feel guilty about it and Huberman backs him. One of the foremost neuro scientists in the world backs him up, lol.
If speech is free, there are also always consequences.
Acting - and speech is an act - has consequences.
