Because we have the ability to read summaries and decide not to support racist bullshit that makes even less sense than flat earth.How can any man have an opinion without watching the movie?
Did you watch it?
Because we have the ability to read summaries and decide not to support racist bullshit that makes even less sense than flat earth.How can any man have an opinion without watching the movie?
Did you watch it?
Holy Shit. I'm impressed.Ok. So I’m going to have to pause it. I’m 30 min in and I don’t know how much I can take. This is what I got from this pseudo ass shit so far.
It begins saying our bondage is due to the curse of Israel. It says it was a 400 year bondage from 1619 to 2019. The slave trade began in 1444 and Africans were sent to America as early as 1526. So this is inaccurate. We weren’t enslaved because of a curse. It was for profit.
They then ask. Who are the real children of Israel. Then show aborigine Australians, Kenyans, Zulu’s, Mexicans, Brazilians, Haitians and African Americans. Judaism is not the main religion in many of these nations. Practicing the religion of the OT doesn’t make you those people.
The documentary says we have been tricked with Islam and Christianity. As if Judaism is inherently African or black. They take this stance because they believe in the idea of Gods chosen people.
Different African tribes have had religious mythos just as long. A lot of the creator Deities like Oludumare don’t involve themselves in human affairs so a Gods chosen people is a foreign concept.
They are using Genesis 10:6-12 to claim the fathers of nations. We have genetic testing now. We don’t need to understand who we are from a book that we predate. We are the original man.
They are now speaking of skin color. They are using race science in an idea that should be based on genetic science. People who live in equatorial zones will have dark skin.
Now they are trying to find out the ethnicity of a mythological person in Abraham. It’s like finding Spider-Man’s race.
Now he’s trying to equate Sumerian civilization to the Palestinians of the Bible. That has been debunked for years. I won’t waste my time.
I have to pause this. I can’t do anymore. I’ll finish later. Well I may not. Lol
Someobody on Twitter watched "Hebrews to Negroes" movie | Toronto Escorts Review Board Forum | Terb
So basically you don't know or haven't witnessed anything.Because we have the ability to read summaries and decide not to support racist bullshit that makes even less sense than flat earth.
What theory was that from Kyrie?Wow. Pushing racist conspiracies to defend Kyrie's racist conspiracy theories.
I'm sure you can find a list of other random imaginary Jews to base your claims on too.
I didn't state an opinion of the film.How can any man have an opinion without watching the movie?
Did you watch it?
I'm implying that this has been blown out of proportion.I didn't state an opinion of the film.
You implied that because it is still on Amazon that it can't be anti-Semitic.
Except quotes from the movie that the makers would have challenged if untrue. I don't have to stick my dick in a light socket to know it's a stupid idea but even that would just be hurting myself and not promoting hatred. C-M watched much of it and stated his opinion too (which you've ignored).So basically you don't know or haven't witnessed anything.
...
He quite clearly stated his views can't be anti-semitic because he's a Jew and they're not.What theory was that from Kyrie?
What's your opinion on the NBA's handling of Donald Sterling and Robert Sarver?I'm implying that this has been blown out of proportion.
Exactly. The NBA has shown a willingness to force owners out of the league for this kind of behaviour…so they are able to look Kyrie in the eye and honestly state that they are holding him to the same standard as they hold themselves.What's your opinion on the NBA's handling of Donald Sterling and Robert Sarver?
And that's the beauty of free speech. You know exactly what everyone is saying if they choose to air it out.The NBA is ultimately decide whether it can have an openly anti-Semitic player in the league and I think the answer is probably No.
If they told you to stick your dick in the socket, you'd probably do it, no hesitation asked and ridicule those who question it. You'd probably pull up a website showing this is why it needs to be done.Except quotes from the movie that the makers would have challenged if untrue. I don't have to stick my dick in a light socket to know it's a stupid idea but even that would just be hurting myself and not promoting hatred. C-M watched much of it and stated his opinion too (which you've ignored).
You've said you watched it. Do you deny those statements were in it?
Can't wait to see what your next excuse is.
Through the bible and other sources, that's the conclusion he's come to.He quite clearly stated his views can't be anti-semitic because he's a Jew and they're not.
They made a direct statement with no room for interpretation.What's your opinion on the NBA's handling of Donald Sterling and Robert Sarver?
In order for Irving to be reinstated, he must reportedly:
These requirements are coming from the Nets, not the league — which told Yahoo Sports last week it was “unaware of the depth of what Irving was asked to fulfill by the team.”
- Issue a verbal apology and condemn the antisemitic film
- Share the apology on social media
- Complete sensitivity trainings
- Meet with Jewish leaders in the Brooklyn community
- Meet with Tsai
- Make a $500,000 donation to anti-hate causes
“I don’t believe Kyrie Irving is antisemitic,” Brown said, via The Globe. “I don’t think people in our governing bodies think he’s antisemitic. He made a mistake. We understand from an outside perspective how important sensitivity is to not condone hate speech and not condone anything of that nature. It’s sensitivity to the dialect around that.“We don’t want to stand up for somebody in order to not condemn hate speech, but I don’t believe Kyrie Irving is antisemitic. And hopefully the NBA feels the same way … There is an interesting distinction between what somebody says verbally and what somebody posts as a link on a platform with no description behind it. Some people will argue there’s no difference and some people will argue there is a difference. There’s no language in our CBA. There’s no rules against it. This is uncharted territory for everybody, and everybody is trying to figure out the difference between the two.”
Gee, that's a lot of word salad to defend overt antisemitism. You claim to have watched that trash; do you claim that the quoted statements aren't actually in it?If they told you to stick your dick in the socket, you'd probably do it, no hesitation asked and ridicule those who question it. You'd probably pull up a website showing this is why it needs to be done.
C-M posted another persons review.
What statements? Lord knows what you're crying about now.
Through the bible and other sources, that's the conclusion he's come to.
They made a direct statement with no room for interpretation.
Kyrie found a documentary with tons of info in it. As a public figure he shouldn't have endorsed such a controversial movie, but I don't believe he did it to be anti-Semitic.
He won't and he'll use the whole thing as 'proof' about Jews trying to enslave black people....
Me thinks Kyrie is toast unless he falls on his sword.
I only got through half. I'll get through the other half hopefully by next week. You can't have an opinion on anything. That would just make you fake, but you seem to be comfortable with that so I don't know.Gee, that's a lot of word salad to defend overt antisemitism. You claim to have watched that trash; do you claim that the quoted statements aren't actually in it?
Kyrie promoted an antisemitic video with absolute trash accusations and his employer feels it goes against NBA policy condemning people for hateful statements. They've punished team owners for it so they sure as hell are going to hold a well know conspiracy theorist accountable.
The league has been very proactive with the Black Lives matter movement and it follows that they hold an individual accountable for their racism.
And despite watching a big chunk, you still want to claim that their anti-semitic thesis isn't antisemitic? Sorry but the racist themes aren't obscure thrown in at the end of the movie but are the entire basis of the film. They don't promote a "range of info" but simply spew hatred and if you're halfway through and still pretend it isn't then you must either be completely ignorant or agree with them.I only got through half. ...