In that case, bring back the McKenzie Brothers.....I'll make it a little clearer:
We should not be funding content that is not good enough to stand on its own merits.
In that case, bring back the McKenzie Brothers.....I'll make it a little clearer:
We should not be funding content that is not good enough to stand on its own merits.
The US has 10x the market.I'll make it a little clearer:
We should not be funding content that is not good enough to stand on its own merits.
If you like their shit overpriced government coffee so much, then you pay for it.The US has 10x the market.
Its a bit like you running a coffee shop and saying you have to stand on your own merit when starbucks moves in next door and uses free samples for a month to put you out of business.
How is the CBC a "political shill"?A billion dollars to be a political shill is outrageous.
Then scale. If you want to play the market size card, then I guess small businesses have no chance and should not bother. There are plenty of real life examples of small businesses succeeding on their own.The US has 10x the market.
Its a bit like you running a coffee shop and saying you have to stand on your own merit when starbucks moves in next door and uses free samples for a month to put you out of business.
Holy fuck what are you smoking??How is the CBC a "political shill"?
The CBC is really the only apolitical news organization in this country, especially when compared to the hard right turn Postmedia has taken since 2014.
And to the wanker calling CBC "state run news," you're getting your interpretation of what 'state run' means from the bastion of sensibility Pissbaby Pierre, aren't you?
It's not "fake news" or "propaganda" just because you don't agree with it.Holy fuck what are you smoking??
Oh believe me, I’ll never tell my political leanings because my option doesn’t matter.It's not "fake news" or "propaganda" just because you don't agree with it.
Any truly objective viewer can see the liberal bias of the CBCacted
It's not "fake news" or "propaganda" just because you don't agree with it.
if its is govt funded yesWhy stop at CBC? I would say that we should get rid of television altogether.....
And the CBC should not be in the business of cancelling or suing the conservative party , no matter how much $ Justin gives themThis is nothing but conservative cancel culture.
Federal government wants to make CBC News commercial free : op-ed
CBC News has been a TV ratings loser for decades.www.fraserinstitute.org
Show us the public record that states exactly what the supposed subsidies are and how much was paid to which specific oil companies ?According to public record.
The Feds spent $1.4 billion on the CBC. At the same time they subsidized private corporations to the tune of $29 billion, a good chunk of it to subsidize the oil company...and some of that payout beyond oil and gas has the stench of Nortel to it.
The semi-freddo MAGAS on this board are barking up the wrong tree.
Whatever.....if its is govt funded yes
The Liberals and Conservatives both fund the CBC, depending on who's in power at the time.And the CBC should not be in the business of cancelling or suing the conservative party , no matter how much $ Justin gives them
I am actually quite puzzled as to why we should show d*ckheads like you anything, especially when you won't believe any of it or cherry-picks whatever shows your narrative. Beginning with the conclusion and trying to make everything fit it is the dumbest thing that you can do.....Show us the public record that states exactly what the supposed subsidies are and how much was paid to which specific oil companies ?
Name the government department dispersing these supposed subsidies and the minister in charge ?
I say there is no such public record, as there are no subsidies ( at least before Justin Trudeau )
but hey you claim a good chunk of $29 B, so you must have the details
unless of course you just mindlessly parroted a lie
or could it be capital cost depreciation against taxable income?
available to all companies who spend money on assets , equipment etc -not a subsidy
Meanwhile
RBC: oil and gas companies poured $48 billion into government coffers | Financial Post
That could rise to $64 billion in royalties and taxes in 2023 if oil prices stay high
pays for the CBC close to thirty times, while the CBC villainizes the industry , how does that smell for you?
you are very wrong
the cash flows ARE from oil companies to government AND IN A BIG WAY
On satellite TV, no.I don't watch the CBC much so not really sure on what to vote.
Only thing I can think of is cutting back on the number of stations. Do we really need 12 CBC stations?