and why do you need to know? it is a commitment women offer for free...nobody is pointing a gun to a woman who wants to do it. a husband's last name doesn't mean ownership...it's more of a symbol...it shows a lady has a commitment to a relationship. it shows solidarity...if you don't want to do it...don't.Hahahahahha. There is a big difference between signing a single paper at the hospital and changing your name on every government document, so SIN, passport, DL. Then bank accounts, credit cards, bills like rogers, etc. Yeah - I’m going to call that annoying paper work.
You still haven’t answer the question. What are the many reasons a woman should take a husbands name? Give me the reasons please.
I get it, it's pretty convenient to not go through all the "annoying paperwork" over a relationship...LoL...stay single...it's fun too.Hahahahahha. There is a big difference between signing a single paper at the hospital and changing your name on every government document, so SIN, passport, DL. Then bank accounts, credit cards, bills like rogers, etc. Yeah - I’m going to call that annoying paper work.
You still haven’t answer the question. What are the many reasons a woman should take a husbands name? Give me the reasons please.
I will thanks. I will love every minute of it as well. LOLI get it, it's pretty convenient to not go through all the "annoying paperwork" over a relationship...LoL...stay single...it's fun too.
In the end, it's only a name. But it's odd when a family doesn't share the same last name.What do you think happens to women when they change their name. Lots of family lines end when the father doesn’t have sons.
Why do I have to lose my family name for you? Not you and I directly but you get what I mean
That is where the tradition came from. To pass down the male line and own the woman. Why do you think the bride is given away by her father? Another stupid tradition.who said that?
With families being made up in so many different ways now, i would guess that thousands of families have different last names.In the end, it's only a name. But it's odd when a family doesn't share the same last name.
She did all the work, but the moment a man wants to walk away, she tells the law to take half his salary.How about the mothers? Again, she did all the work, didn’t she? Should that not account for something regarding the child?
Ok, I can kinda go with that, but we lost…. Then. Why can’t we change it now? You see how many men here would be upset if the wife or kids, especially kids, didn’t have their last name, yet all they did to create and bring forth the child was shoot some sperm. LOLThe kids have to take 1 name or the other. It's 50-50. Women lost and then the tradition carried on for thousands of years.
Why cry iver a coin toss, you lost, move on.
Lol
You are proving the point. Men don’t even have to stick around so why not have the women have the name or men should have to pay the wife to labouring his child with his name since she is in a sense, working for him.She did all the work, but the moment a man wants to walk away, she tells the law to take half his salary.
Funny how all this works.
And who initiates 70%-80% of divorces?Women should NOT change their names when they marry. 50% of marriages end in divorce and usually the mom has primary custody of the kids. A significant number of offspring may not be the product of the husband. We all know for sure who the mom is. Women should keep their names, with the children keeping the mom's name. The husband can take her last name or keep his own. It makes far more sense.
Men don't have to stick around, but their wallet does. We would gladly change 9months pregnancy for 18 years of extortion.You are proving the point. Men don’t even have to stick around so why not have the women have the name or men should have to pay the wife to labouring his child with his name since she is in a sense, working for him.
Why should a woman work for free? And I know neither of us, or I hope, neither of us are being serious because I don’t think you believe it is right that man walk away from his responsiblity, which includes paying for his part in the child’s finically upbringing.
Of course your wallet does. Why do you think you have the right to father a child but not pay your share of that child’s needs? Why do you think you are not responsible to feed, clothes, shelter the child you fathered?Men don't have to stick around, but their wallet does. We would gladly change 9months pregnancy for 18 years of extortion.
Make up your mind. Do you need us men or are you all strong independent women?Of course your wallet does. Why do you think you have the right to father a child but not pay your share of that child’s needs? Why do you think you are not responsible to feed, clothes, shelter the child you fathered?
BTW - fathers shouldn’t be leaving period. You should be in your child’s life to do other parenting things like teach and nurture and raise your child.
Again, what does being a strong woman have to do with your part of your responsibility? So a strong woman means you can get away with not being a father? How does that work? Men only have to be involved if the woman is weak? LOL. Nice try.Make up your mind. Do you need us men or are you all strong independent women?
You forgot the word independent.Again, what does being a strong woman have to do with your part of your responsibility? So a strong woman means you can get away with not being a father? How does that work? Men only have to be involved if the woman is weak? LOL. Nice try.