Prominent conservatives issue 72 Page report rebutting Trump election claims
- Thread starter bver_hunter
- Start date
Really? They eat shit and vomit and they can eat your couch given enough time. Why am I not amazed? “Insert shrug emoji here”
PS - and you also encourage the dog to vomit more…
Last edited:
Fact Check-Does ‘2000 Mules’ provide evidence of voter fraud in the 2020 U.S. presidential election?
A documentary directed by conservative commentator Dinesh D’Souza claims it can prove widespread fraud was carried out during the 2020 presidential election in the United States. Reuters Fact Check examined the main claims presented in the film and did not find any concrete...
www.reuters.com
Fact Check-Does ‘2000 Mules’ provide evidence of voter fraud in the 2020 U.S. presidential election?
a complete farcical, fictional joke of a movie.
Or you could look and say 'ok, I won't leave the raisins out again', or 'don't let them think 2000 mules is serious'.
Hmm, wonder how much further we can push this metaphor...
This was the guy who was found guilty of Campaign Violation Fraud and sentenced to five years of probation:Fact Check-Does ‘2000 Mules’ provide evidence of voter fraud in the 2020 U.S. presidential election?
A documentary directed by conservative commentator Dinesh D’Souza claims it can prove widespread fraud was carried out during the 2020 presidential election in the United States. Reuters Fact Check examined the main claims presented in the film and did not find any concrete...
Fact Check-Does ‘2000 Mules’ provide evidence of voter fraud in the 2020 U.S. presidential election?
a complete farcical, fictional joke of a movie.
Dinesh D’Souza Sentenced in Manhattan Federal Court to Five Years of Probation for Campaign Finance Fraud — FBI
Preet Bharara, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, announced today that DINESH DSOUZA was sentenced in Manhattan federal court to five years of probation, with eight months during the first year to be served in a community confinement center, after having pled...
www.fbi.gov
Can we believe someone as dishonest as him? Then Trump has to pardon him as he needs another ass kisser to come up with some BS in his favour.
This 2000 Mules became the laughing stock of even the Republicans. Watch the video in this link:
Fox News Host Blasts Ann Coulter After Trashing '2,000 Mules'
"Does it get any lower than Coulter? Speaking of grifters..." Mark Levin tweeted.
www.newsweek.com
Almost as funny as Alan Dershowitz claiming to be a dem who defended democracy when he was backing rump's coup attempt.Mark Levin labels Ann Coulter as a grifter. It's kind of entertaining, you'll have to admit...
Mark Levin labels Ann Coulter as a grifter
Dinesh D’Souza is so frequently wrong that he spawned a whole Twitter community that just dunks on him and his stupid takes. The man pretends to be some sort of intellectual, but anything he does would not stand up to the rigours of a peer review process. So, he makes stupid "movies" like this and Death of a Nation or Obama's America. They are the Fox News of documentaries where important and impartial facts are left out if they don't agree with his narrative. All he does is serve red meat to the MAGA cult who swallow it without asking questions. You can argue that Michael Moore does similar stuff with his left-leaning docs, and I wouldn't disagree. But from the ones I've seen of D'Souza's...he makes impossible leaps of logic or uses innuendo to make his arguments without the pesky requirement for actual fact. They are more in the realm of fiction than anything else.Fact Check-Does ‘2000 Mules’ provide evidence of voter fraud in the 2020 U.S. presidential election?
A documentary directed by conservative commentator Dinesh D’Souza claims it can prove widespread fraud was carried out during the 2020 presidential election in the United States. Reuters Fact Check examined the main claims presented in the film and did not find any concrete...
Fact Check-Does ‘2000 Mules’ provide evidence of voter fraud in the 2020 U.S. presidential election?
a complete farcical, fictional joke of a movie.
The court cases were only decisions based on standards established by courts (not legislators) for obtaining pre-trial relief, which, frankly, are designed to make it extremely difficult for courts to overturn, or delay certification of elections.
Anything the judges said about "merit" in that context is strictly limited to that legal exercise.
Judges have no power to determine whether government officials can decide whether to audit elections (unless a law binds an official to do it) or whether they should report fully to the public concerning any election concerns raised.
You misunderstand the role of courts with respect to this issue (and probably their role in society overall).
You are misinformed. As an example, produce a link to a Pennsylvania government report which addresses all of the allegations raised in the myriad cases brought in that jurisdiction. It doesn't exist. Then try Michigan. The audits you refer to are recounts. Recounts are not audits. What people "can find" when full access to the evidence is denied to them is not of any persuasive value.
That's a theory, and there's no doubt that prominent public figures continue to be skeptical regarding the election, but you are overlooking the more obvious explanation that the critical states have done their best to avoid full scrutiny and/or providing full answers to the allegations made regarding the process in their states.
Reasonable theories are why investigations take place. If you had to "prove" your complaint in order to justify an investigation, there would be no need for investigations.
Last edited:
The "prominent public figures" are all GOP hacks and trump ass-kissers. If the GOP had any real evidence, they'd go in front of a judge. And you know.... they did that 60 times and the judges rolled their eyes and kicked Trump's ass out of court and wrote to the Bar Associations of his attorneys asking that they be disbarred.
Real controversies get litigated and resolved in the courts. They don't get kicked out of court all 60 times and still have grifter politicians still talking about them.
Sorry, but you've been proven wrong. Over 60 times. The courts have made it clear they are only willing to do so much towards resolving election integrity concerns. The ultimate responsibility resides with lawmakers. That's who the public are appealing to now.
What you have to understand is that in States like Arizona where the audits were conducted, votes for Biden increased and Trumps were found to be over counted. The Courts decide whether the Protocols were conducted in a timely and precise manner, without any sizeable irregularities. Remember that Dominion Voting Machines where all that BS allegations by far right media's misinformation have ingrained a false sense of this "Voter Fraud" and "Stolen Elections" that was found to have been garbaged in Court. No evidence whatsoever was provided by Giuliani and his defence team. Even Bill Barr openly laughed at the content of the "2000 Mules" that was mentioned in that Testimony from Him. So stop preaching what we do or do not comprehend in the courts as even Fox News as many of these right wing outlets are too embarrassed at the deceptive propaganda that they previously relayed to their viewers, and are quietly backing away from the "Stolen Elections" front line news. Now we have to see what Steve Bannon has to offer as he was one of the kingpins in this respect!!
A fundamental confusion seems to be at the core of your position. Recounting votes is not auditing. Most of the concerns raised (admittedly, not all) were about whether ballots were improperly harvested and/or fraudulently submitted by mail. Recounting those same ballots is immaterial to resolving those concerns. You'll never understand that most of the concerns raised have never been seriously addressed until you begin to understand the different natures of the different claims that were made.
I'm betting that the date this understanding will take root with you is never.
Do your research for once rather than post your usual drivel!! Arizona conducted an AUDIT for possible Voter fraud in some of the Counties:
Why Trump’s Election-Audit Circus Just Won’t End
A guide to Arizona’s sloppy recount, why other Republican-led states are following suit, and what “audit” proponents are really after.
nymag.com
In other words you are really brainwashed in believing the nonsense that the "Elections were Stolen". Real bud Plug play coming into action similar to the James fields Innocence Saga. ROTFLMAO!!
I make a point. You throw a chicken. That's your idea of a rebuttal. Throwing chickens. LOL!Do your research for once rather than post your usual drivel!! Arizona conducted an AUDIT for possible Voter fraud in some of the Counties:
Why Trump’s Election-Audit Circus Just Won’t End
A guide to Arizona’s sloppy recount, why other Republican-led states are following suit, and what “audit” proponents are really after.
In other words you are really brainwashed in believing the nonsense that the "Elections were Stolen". Real bud Plug play coming into action similar to the James fields Innocence Saga. ROTFLMAO!!
Dutch, if the courts thought that those cases were anything but 100% horseshit, they would have overturned the election.
It's preposterous to suggest that they wouldn't. You just don't like the fact that your orange-skinned Depends-wearing hero lost not only an election, but 60 lawsuits whining, pouting and sniffling about that election.
So proven how wrong your presumptions were. For a change think before you post, as it is so hilarious that you presume that only ballots were counted and there were no audits after the 2020 elections. ROTFLMAO!!
