'Astonishing bit of fake news' exposed in Canada

Dutch Oven

Well-known member
Feb 12, 2019
6,996
2,481
113
The fact that parents were not told about their children's death is beyond dispute.

Do you really think they came home on the bus at 3 pm every day?
No, but the vast majority came home for the summer. Even the small group who stayed at school year round had a measure of contact with their parents. It would be impossible for the parents not to notice their absence/lack of contact, or for the school to simply claim "Oh Johnny, don't know what happened to him. Haven't seen him in a few months." Gawd, you'd have be pretty detached from reality not to be able to think this through.
 

danmand

Well-known member
Nov 28, 2003
46,483
4,902
113
No, but the vast majority came home for the summer. Even the small group who stayed at school year round had a measure of contact with their parents. It would be impossible for the parents not to notice their absence/lack of contact, or for the school to simply claim "Oh Johnny, don't know what happened to him. Haven't seen him in a few months." Gawd, you'd have be pretty detached from reality not to be able to think this through.
If you think it appropriate for parents to only find out their child has perished when he or she does not return for the summer, I don't think you have any consideration for first nations people.
Remember that many children were taken to the Indian schools by force.

The disregard for the first nations people is a mark of shame on Canada that will never go away. It is only a few degrees from genocide.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nemohotpot

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,866
22,266
113
If you think it appropriate for parents to only find out their child has perished when he or she does not return for the summer, I don't think you have any consideration for first nations people.
Remember that many children were taken to the Indian schools by force.
I wonder how many people in Canada are this extreme as to deny the residential school scandals?
I think this would be as extreme as the organizers of the karenkonvoy but perhaps even a bit further out.
 

Dutch Oven

Well-known member
Feb 12, 2019
6,996
2,481
113
If you think it appropriate for parents to only find out their child has perished when he or she does not return for the summer, I don't think you have any consideration for first nations people.
You're not grasping my point. I DON'T believe that parents were only informed of their child's death at the end of the school year. I think they were informed promptly. I am simply responding to the ridiculous argument that they weren't informed at all. There was no conceivable way of hiding this information from parents.

Remember that many children were taken to the Indian schools by force.
They were made to go to school just like all children at that time by means of the truancy laws. It just happened that the schools that were established for them were residential. Some native families didn't like it. Some welcomed the offloading of responsibility. For some who had been living in abject poverty, even the modest provisions of the schools was a great improvement. I'm sure the children were anxious about being on their own (just as they are at any boarding school, even the most prestigious ones), and I'm sure they didn't like the adjustments to the lives that the schools forced upon them. However, the nature of exactly what happened to them is the issue to be addressed. I am not persuaded the schools were set up as death camps, or even allowed to become them through inadvertence. The numbers do not bear out this conclusion. Some children deeply resented the experience they had (and some were indisputably abused). Some children became educated and bettered their lives substantially. In that context, "residential school survivor" is an intentially misleading term.

The disregard for the first nations people is a mark of shame on Canada that will never go away. It is only a few degrees from genocide.
Genocide is very easy to distinguish from anything which is not genocide, and the two sides of that line are miles apart. The schools were not death camps. Children died. It has yet to be established just how extraordinary, or not, their death rates were relative to society as a whole, considering the state of medical care at the time, and the standard of medical care available in their particular communities. Walk through any graveyard in any community. You're going to find periods where children died at higher rates and lower rates depending on public health issues and the standard of care available from medical science at the time (in a particular community). Kids could not be choppered across the the provinces for the finest care in the big cities until relatively late in the story of the residential schools.

Some bad things happened in those schools to some children. Some bad things also happened to other children in other schools in other communities. The attempt to deprogram native culture out of the kids appears to have been unsuccessful, unnecessary, and unwise. I'm not sure why governments thought otherwise at the time. I'm completely sure it wasn't in order to exterminate those children or cause them to commit suicide.
 

danmand

Well-known member
Nov 28, 2003
46,483
4,902
113
You're not grasping my point. I DON'T believe that parents were only informed of their child's death at the end of the school year. I think they were informed promptly. I am simply responding to the ridiculous argument that they weren't informed at all. There was no conceivable way of hiding this information from parents.


They were made to go to school just like all children at that time by means of the truancy laws. It just happened that the schools that were established for them were residential. Some native families didn't like it. Some welcomed the offloading of responsibility. For some who had been living in abject poverty, even the modest provisions of the schools was a great improvement. I'm sure the children were anxious about being on their own (just as they are at any boarding school, even the most prestigious ones), and I'm sure they didn't like the adjustments to the lives that the schools forced upon them. However, the nature of exactly what happened to them is the issue to be addressed. I am not persuaded the schools were set up as death camps, or even allowed to become them through inadvertence. The numbers do not bear out this conclusion. Some children deeply resented the experience they had (and some were indisputably abused). Some children became educated and bettered their lives substantially. In that context, "residential school survivor" is an intentially misleading term.


Genocide is very easy to distinguish from anything which is not genocide, and the two sides of that line are miles apart. The schools were not death camps. Children died. It has yet to be established just how extraordinary, or not, their death rates were relative to society as a whole, considering the state of medical care at the time, and the standard of medical care available in their particular communities. Walk through any graveyard in any community. You're going to find periods where children died at higher rates and lower rates depending on public health issues and the standard of care available from medical science at the time (in a particular community). Kids could not be choppered across the the provinces for the finest care in the big cities until relatively late in the story of the residential schools.

Some bad things happened in those schools to some children. Some bad things also happened to other children in other schools in other communities. The attempt to deprogram native culture out of the kids appears to have been unsuccessful, unnecessary, and unwise. I'm not sure why governments thought otherwise at the time. I'm completely sure it wasn't in order to exterminate those children or cause them to commit suicide.
You must have missed the article about the starvation experiments, which included the withholding of medical and dental care to children in the Residential schools. The experiments went on to 1952.

Like many canadians you show no empathy whatsoever for the victims of the residential schools or the other first nations people for that matter.

Canada will forever be shamed by this.
 

nemohotpot

Member
Jan 30, 2022
72
92
18

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,866
22,266
113
You must have missed the article about the starvation experiments, which included the withholding of medical and dental care to children in the Residential schools. The experiments went on to 1952.

Like many canadians you show no empathy whatsoever for the victims of the residential schools or the other first nations people for that matter.

Canada will forever be shamed by this.
Bud plug spent hours on this board defending James Fields attack in Charlottesville.
There is a pattern to what he defends, its pretty black and white.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nemohotpot

dirtydaveiii

Well-known member
Mar 21, 2018
7,335
5,065
113
People just shake their head at you in amazement. Do you really think that Native parents were not told that their child had passed away? Didn't they notice their absence when the other children returned from school? You must have a very low opinion of them.

That's the thing about posters like you - you can't be satisfied with a reasonable question - was it reasonable public policy to have delivered education in this way to native children - instead you have to exaggerate the issue beyond all credibility to "the Residential Schools were death camps". It's difficult to seriously consider the first issue, and what should be done about it, when you leave such trash on the table as if it deserves equal consideration.
You must be baiting. I find it inconceivable that anyone could really be that stupid
 

dirtydaveiii

Well-known member
Mar 21, 2018
7,335
5,065
113
You're not grasping my point. I DON'T believe that parents were only informed of their child's death at the end of the school year. I think they were informed promptly. I am simply responding to the ridiculous argument that they weren't informed at all. There was no conceivable way of hiding this information from parents.


They were made to go to school just like all children at that time by means of the truancy laws. It just happened that the schools that were established for them were residential. Some native families didn't like it. Some welcomed the offloading of responsibility. For some who had been living in abject poverty, even the modest provisions of the schools was a great improvement. I'm sure the children were anxious about being on their own (just as they are at any boarding school, even the most prestigious ones), and I'm sure they didn't like the adjustments to the lives that the schools forced upon them. However, the nature of exactly what happened to them is the issue to be addressed. I am not persuaded the schools were set up as death camps, or even allowed to become them through inadvertence. The numbers do not bear out this conclusion. Some children deeply resented the experience they had (and some were indisputably abused). Some children became educated and bettered their lives substantially. In that context, "residential school survivor" is an intentially misleading term.


Genocide is very easy to distinguish from anything which is not genocide, and the two sides of that line are miles apart. The schools were not death camps. Children died. It has yet to be established just how extraordinary, or not, their death rates were relative to society as a whole, considering the state of medical care at the time, and the standard of medical care available in their particular communities. Walk through any graveyard in any community. You're going to find periods where children died at higher rates and lower rates depending on public health issues and the standard of care available from medical science at the time (in a particular community). Kids could not be choppered across the the provinces for the finest care in the big cities until relatively late in the story of the residential schools.

Some bad things happened in those schools to some children. Some bad things also happened to other children in other schools in other communities. The attempt to deprogram native culture out of the kids appears to have been unsuccessful, unnecessary, and unwise. I'm not sure why governments thought otherwise at the time. I'm completely sure it wasn't in order to exterminate those children or cause them to commit suicide.
OK let's play your game. So is youe position that
A ; All scientists are wrong
B: some scientists are wrong
C : no scientists are wrong

D : all internet bloggers are right
E all internet bloggers are wrong
F some internet bloggers are wrong
 

poker

Everyone's hero's, tell everyone's lies.
Jun 1, 2006
7,741
6,020
113
Niagara

Trudeau has just made Canada the laughingstock of the world..........

Just fucking wow…. This is the garbage you are posting now? This goes so beyond scumbag. I really have no words.
 

Dutch Oven

Well-known member
Feb 12, 2019
6,996
2,481
113
OK let's play your game. So is youe position that
A ; All scientists are wrong
B: some scientists are wrong
C : no scientists are wrong

D : all internet bloggers are right
E all internet bloggers are wrong
F some internet bloggers are wrong
Frankie knows I don't answer stupid questions. That's why he's happy for you to ask them for him.
 

Dutch Oven

Well-known member
Feb 12, 2019
6,996
2,481
113

Dutch Oven

Well-known member
Feb 12, 2019
6,996
2,481
113
You must have missed the article about the starvation experiments, which included the withholding of medical and dental care to children in the Residential schools. The experiments went on to 1952.

Like many canadians you show no empathy whatsoever for the victims of the residential schools or the other first nations people for that matter.

Canada will forever be shamed by this.
Let's start with the truth. Then we'll decide who were "victims", and what they were victims of. And then we can decide who was responsible, and whether all Canadians need to share in their guilt.

Here's an example. Read this reporting on your so-called "starvation" experiments: https://www.cbc.ca/radio/unreserved... some children,as controls in the experiments.

Even the CBC (hardly a right-leaning source) noted:

1. The government didn't restrict or worsen the diets of control group children. Malnutrition (not the same as "starvation") was already endemic to both the indigenous communities and the residential schools.
2. The government "experiment" was to see if nutional supplements could solve the problem. Put another way, the Government was looking to resolve malnutition amongst indigenous Canadians, not looking to torture them.
3. The experiments happened from sometime in the 40's to sometime in the 50's. A small slice of the history of residential schools.
4. The study group was 1000 children (control and supplement group). A small slice of the number of children who went to residential schools over their lengthy history.

You are badly misinformed on this topic.

The persistent problem with those who talk about truth and reconciliation is that they don't understand that we haven't arrived at the truth part yet.
 
Last edited:

danmand

Well-known member
Nov 28, 2003
46,483
4,902
113
Canada’s shameful history of nutrition research on residential school children: The need for strong medical ethics in Aboriginal health research
Noni E MacDonald, MD FRCPC, Richard Stanwick, MD, and Andrew Lynk, MD
Author information Article notes Copyright and License information Disclaimer
This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.


While both science and research have very long and detailed histories, the formal history of medical ethics is short. The discipline’s foundation arises from the medical atrocities performed in the name of science by a cadre of Nazi doctors during World War II. The actions were so despicable that 20 physicians were put on trial in Nuremberg for violation of the Hippocratic Oath and behaviour incompatible with their education and profession. A result of this 1946 trial was the Nuremberg Code of Medical Ethics (1).
Last year, Ian Mosby, a food historian and postdoctoral fellow at the University of Guelph (Guelph, Ontario), revealed details of highly unethical nutrition experiments performed on Canadian Aboriginal children at six residential schools between 1942 and 1952 (2) – our own medical atrocities. The experiments were performed by the Department of Indian Affairs of Canada under the direction of two physicians: Dr Percy Moore, the Indian Affairs Branch Superintendent of Medical Services, and Dr Frederick Tisdall, a famed nutritionist, a former president of the Canadian Paediatric Society and one of three paediatricians at The Hospital for Sick Children (Toronto, Ontario) who developed Pablum infant cereal in the 1930s. In these experiments, parents were not informed, nor were consents obtained. Even as children died, the experiments continued. Even after the recommendations from the Nuremberg trial, these experiments continued.
In these experiments, control and treatment groups of mal-nourished children were denied adequate nutrition. In one experiment, the treatment group received supplements of riboflavin, thiamine and/or ascorbic acid supplements to determine whether these mitigated the problems – they did not. In another, children were given a flour mix containing added thiamine, riboflavin, niacin and bone meal. Rather than improving nutrition, the children became more anemic, likely contributing to more deaths and certainly impacting development. In these experiments, efforts were made to control as many factors as possible, even when they harmed the research subjects. For example, previously available dental care was denied in some settings because the researchers wanted to observe the state of dental caries and gingivitis with malnutrition.
How could we have let this happen? Why did we not know about this long before now? Why did these experiments not stop when the Nuremberg Code was put forward?
Similar to the US Public Health Service Syphilis Study at Tuskeegee (3) – which, in 1932, set out with the “best of intentions” to learn about the natural history of syphilis among black men in hopes of justifying a treatment program for them – Canadian researchers used Aboriginal children in residential schools to learn about malnutrition. The problem in Tuskeegee (Alabama) was that the natural history observations continued long after penicillin became available to treat syphilis. In Canada’s case, the basics of alleviating malnutrition (adequate food) were well known even before these experiments began. The most striking fact is that both studies were performed among individuals who were already marginalized and vulnerable. No one was looking out for the best interests of these research subjects. They had no voice.
While many changes and improvements have been made in the area of ethical health research since the 1940s, Aboriginal children and youth remain a highly vulnerable population. Extra care must be taken.
The current issue of Paediatrics & Child Health includes a Canadian Paediatric Society position statement entitled ‘Health research involving First Nations, Inuit and Métis children and their communities’, (4) with recommendations on Aboriginal community ownership of research projects, one measure that can help to ensure the potential for research abuse is minimized. Other measures, such as data safety review committees as well as rigorous research ethics board review, are also critical. It behooves all of us who care for children and youth to ensure that research abuse and other potential opportunities for abuse are minimized by being vigilant, thoughtful and introspective.
Go to:
REFERENCES
1. United States Holocaust Museum The Nuremberg Code. < www.ushmm.org/information/exhibitions/online-features/special-focus/doctors-trial/nuremberg-code> (Accessed December 18, 2013). [Google Scholar]
2. Mosby I. Administering colonial science: Nutrition research and human biomedical experimentation in Aboriginal communities and residential schools, 1942–1952. Social History. 2013;46:145–72. [Google Scholar]
3. US Public Health Service Syphilis Study at Tuskeegee. <www.cdc.gov/tuskegee/timeline.htm#> (Accessed December 18, 2013).
4. Starkes JM, Baydala LT, Canadian Paediatric Society. First Nations. Inuit and Métis Health Committee Health research involving First Nations, Inuit and Métis children and their communities. Paediatr Child Health. 2014;19:99–106. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
 

danmand

Well-known member
Nov 28, 2003
46,483
4,902
113
The dark history of Canada's Food Guide: How experiments on Indigenous children shaped nutrition policy
Social Sharing
Zoe Tennant · Posted: Apr 19, 2021 3:52 PM ET | Last Updated: July 5, 2021



Unreserved15:32The dark history of Canada’s Food Guide: How experiments on Indigenous children shaped nutrition policy
This segment originally aired on April 18, 2021.

When historian Ian Mosby published evidence that the Canadian government had conducted nutritional experiments on Indigenous children in residential schools, his findings made headlines across the country.

Historian Ian Mosby (Submitted by Ian Mosby)In his academic article 'Administering Colonial Science,' published in 2013, Mosby revealed how nutritional studies and experiments were performed in Indigenous communities and residential schools in the 1940s and '50s.
The tests were apparently done, explained Mosby, without the informed consent or knowledge of the Indigenous people involved.
What isn't yet widely known, said Mosby, a professor of history at Ryerson University, is how these experiments are directly connected to Canada's Food Guide.
Government policies were creating conditions of hunger
In the 1940s, federal bureaucrats found that malnutrition was widespread in Indigenous communities and residential schools. But this wasn't new information to many Indigenous people.
"Indigenous people had been arguing for a long time that their kids were hungry in residential schools, that government policies were creating conditions of hunger in their communities," explained Mosby.
The Canadian government began to send researchers to examine these conditions of hunger. In many cases, the researchers found "severe malnutrition," said Mosby.
Some federal bureaucrats and scientists saw the pervasive malnutrition and hunger experienced by Indigenous people as an opportunity to test their scientific theories.
Lionel Pett
The federal Nutrition Services Division was established in 1941 under the leadership of a medical doctor and biochemist named Lionell Pett.
Pett was a "major player" in setting nutritional standards and policy in Canada, said Mobsy. Scientific questions were often on Pett's mind, explained Mosby, questions like what the daily recommended intake for different vitamins and minerals should be. But there was controversy over how to determine dietary standards, said Mosby, and it was challenging to do the kinds of studies that were needed to test Pett's questions.
The long term impact of that kind of hunger during childhood leads to a whole series of problems.- Ian Mosby
"It's really difficult to do those kinds of experiments because you need hungry people," said Mosby.
"When Pett began to uncover these accounts of hunger in Indigenous communities and in residential schools, he saw this as an opportunity to put some of these controversies to the test."
The experiments
Pett oversaw a series of nutritional experiments in Indigenous communities. Among these was a long-term study carried out in residential schools which used Indigenous students as experimental subjects.
In 1947, Pett began testing different nutritional interventions on close to 1,000 children in six residential schools across the country. These experiments used the baseline of malnutrition and hunger experienced by Indigenous children in the schools as a way to test "a whole bunch of both interventions and non-interventions," explained Mosby. These experiments included some children, who were known to be malnourished, receiving no changes to their diets in order to act as controls in the experiments.
You can draw a direct line between the types of experiments that were being done in residential schools and .... the food guide.-Ian Mosby
One intervention included testing an experimental fortified flour mixture on residential school students. There was a federal ban on fortified flour at the time, and there was debate over whether or not to legalize it, explained Mosby. Pett and his colleagues introduced an experimental flour mixture which included substances like bone meal. Pett and the researchers found increased incidences of anemia among the students who were fed the experimental flour.
The federal government's larger social experiment
The nutritional experiments were part of a larger series of "investigations" into the diets of Indigenous people during this period, what Mosby described as the federal government's "social experiment" to transform Indigenous people's diets.

“The most important connection between the nutrition experiments and Canada's Food Guide is Lionel Pett,” said Mosby. “Pett was the architect of Canada's Food Guide.” Canada's Official Food Rules was the country's first food guide. Issued in 1942, it was the precursor to Canada’s Food Guide. (Swift Canadian Co.)
A justification for these experiments, explained Mosby, was a theory going around among scientists and bureaucrats that the so-called "Indian problem" might have been caused by malnutrition and not due to what they saw as "racial traits."
"They took the extremely racist idea that Indigenous peoples were somehow racially inferior, and they suggested that might have had to do with nutrition. And so they took it upon themselves to solve this 'Indian problem' through expert intervention into Indigenous people's diets."
"At the heart of this was this …. willful attempt to ignore the actual cause of the changes in Indigenous people's diets which was colonialism, which was the Indian Act, which was the forced removal of Indigenous people from their lands, the limits placed on Indigenous peoples' livelihoods through regulations on hunting and trapping, through the effects of residential schools — all of these different elements of Canadian colonialism, which led to problems with Indigenous people's diets."
Direct line between nutritional experiments and Canada's Food Guide
"The most important connection between the nutrition experiments and Canada's Food Guide is Lionel Pett," said Mosby. "Pett was the architect of Canada's Food Guide."
Pett was the primary author of Canada's Official Food Rules, which was introduced in 1942 and was the precursor to Canada's Food Guide.
"The nature of the experiments that [Pett] conducted in residential schools was determined based on a whole series of internal debates among nutrition professionals and bureaucrats about Canada's Food Guide and about what a healthy and nutritionally adequate diet looked like."
"Pett used the opportunity of hungry kids in residential schools … who had no choice in what they were going to eat and whose parents had no choice in what they were going to eat … to attempt to answer a series of questions that were of interest to him professionally and scientifically."
"You can draw a direct line between the types of experiments that were being done in residential schools and these larger debates about how they should structure the food guide."
The ongoing impact of the nutritional experiments
"What happened to me because of these experiments?" is a question that Mosby has heard from many residential school survivors.
Following the publication of Mosby's 2013 article which revealed that nutritional experiments were conducted in Indigenous communities and on students in residential schools, Mosby co-authored an article that investigated the long-term health impacts of the widespread malnutrition and hunger experienced in residential schools.
''Hunger was never absent': How residential school diets shaped current patterns of diabetes among Indigenous peoples in Canada' was published in the Canadian Medical Association Journal in 2017 and was co-authored by Mosby and Tracey Galloway, an anthropology professor at the University of Toronto .
"We found that the food served in residential schools, that the level of hunger experienced by kids, had long term health effects not just on survivors themselves, but also on their children."
"The long term impact of that kind of hunger during childhood leads to a whole series of problems, starting with stunting and kids not reaching their growth potential, but leading to a higher incidence of type 2 diabetes, a tendency toward obesity later in life, and a whole range of problems that sort of cascade from there."
These are health problems that impact Indigenous people disproportionately in Canada, explained Mosby. "There's been a tendency over time to argue that there's a genetic basis for this," he said.
"That ignores the fact that …. a lot of these health conditions are produced by Canadian institutions like residential schools."
Mosby hopes his research "puts the lie to" the idea that there's "somehow an Indigenous genetic susceptibility" to health conditions like type 2 diabetes. "In fact, the susceptibility is Canadian colonialism and Canadian colonial policy."
 

danmand

Well-known member
Nov 28, 2003
46,483
4,902
113
Allison Daniel: Nutrition researchers saw malnourished children at residential schools as perfect test subjects
Opinion: For residential school survivors, malnutrition has lasting effects. Starvation during childhood increases risk of chronic conditions, and research indicates severe malnutrition may even cause epigenetic changes that can be passed on through generations

Author of the article:
Allison Daniel
Publishing date:
Jul 04, 2021 • July 29, 2021

The discovery of hundreds of children’s remains in Kamloops, Cranbrook, Brandon and Cowessess have exposed the absolute devastation settlers inflicted upon Indigenous children, families and communities through the Indian Residential School system.


As a nutrition researcher, and settler-Canadian, I am calling on my peers to recognize and understand the harms that malnutrition and nutrition experiments on Indigenous people have caused and the legacy they have left.



Ian Mosby, historian of food, Indigenous health and the politics of Canadian settler colonialism, uncovered that between 1942 and 1952, Canada’s most prominent nutrition scientists performed highly unethical research on 1,300 Indigenous people, including 1,000 children, in Cree communities in northern Manitoba and at six residential schools across Canada.

Many were already suffering from malnutrition because of destructive government policies and terrible conditions at residential schools.

In the eyes of researchers, this made them ideal test subjects.

Frederick Tisdall — famous for being a co-creator of the infant food Pablum at the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto — along with Percy Moore and Lionel Bradley Pett were the main architects of the nutrition experiments.

They proposed that education and dietary interventions would make Indigenous people more profitable assets to Canada, that if Indigenous people were healthier, transmission of diseases like tuberculosis to white people would decline and assimilation would be easier.

They successfully pitched their plan for nutrition experiments to the federal government.

Tisdall, Moore and their team based their pitch on the results they found after subjecting 400 Cree adults and children in northern Manitoba to a range of intrusive assessments, including physical exams, X–rays and blood draws.

The pitch from Pett and his team centred on determining a baseline. They wanted to give children at the Alberni Indian Residential School a low amount of milk for two years, enough to substantially deprive growing children of the calories and nutrients they needed.

Other experiments involved withholding essential vitamins and minerals to children in control groups, while preventing Indian Health Services from providing dental care under the guise that this could impact the study results.

And even before these experiments, children at Indian Residential Schools were going hungry — with reports of severe malnutrition and signs of serious vitamin and mineral deficiencies.

Interest in nutrition research rose dramatically in the 1940s after the Canadian Council on Nutrition stated publicly that more than 60 per cent of people in Canada had nutritional deficiencies.



Most experiments up to then had been done in animals, but researchers like Pett, who was the main author of what later became Canada’s Food Guide, capitalized on the opportunity to use Indigenous people as lab rats.

While perpetrators like Pett often operated under the facade of comprehending and helping Indigenous people, racial underpinnings of these nutrition experiments have been clear.

Investigators sought to unravel the “Indian Problem.” Moore, Tisdall and their collaborators attributed discriminatory stereotypes like “shiftlessness, indolence, improvidence and inertia” to malnutrition.

A.E. Caldwell, principal of Alberni Indian Residential School, claimed the malnutrition was caused by traditional diets and ways of living, which he also called “indolent habits.” The nutrition experiments, alongside the profoundly inadequate and low-quality foods given to children in residential schools, aligned perfectly with Caldwell’s mandate of assimilation.


Barring virtually all children from adequate traditional foods is yet another means of colonization and cultural genocide.

According to Mosby’s findings, Pett stated that he aimed to better understand the “inevitable” transition away from traditional foods, yet Indian residential schools were purposefully designed to cause this.

Their research is unethical by contemporary standards, and it is hard to believe it was ever acceptable to experiment on anyone, let alone children, without consent.

The aftermath of the Holocaust and the biomedical experiments in concentration camps led to the development of the Nuremberg Code in 1947, which states that voluntary consent for research is absolutely essential and that experiments should avoid all unnecessary mental and physical suffering.

The code came out the same year that Pett embarked on his nutrition experiments at six residential schools.

Childhood malnutrition can be deadly, especially when coupled with the risk of disease, which was often the case in residential schools.

The Truth and Reconciliation Commission’s Final Report indicates that the main causes of death in children at residential schools were physical harm, malnutrition, illness and neglect.

For residential school survivors, malnutrition has lasting effects. Starvation during childhood increases risk of chronic conditions like Type 2 diabetes, and research indicates that severe malnutrition may even cause epigenetic changes that can be passed on through generations.
 

Dutch Oven

Well-known member
Feb 12, 2019
6,996
2,481
113
The dark history of Canada's Food Guide: How experiments on Indigenous children shaped nutrition policy
Social Sharing
Zoe Tennant · Posted: Apr 19, 2021 3:52 PM ET | Last Updated: July 5, 2021



Unreserved15:32The dark history of Canada’s Food Guide: How experiments on Indigenous children shaped nutrition policy
This segment originally aired on April 18, 2021.

When historian Ian Mosby published evidence that the Canadian government had conducted nutritional experiments on Indigenous children in residential schools, his findings made headlines across the country.

Historian Ian Mosby (Submitted by Ian Mosby)In his academic article 'Administering Colonial Science,' published in 2013, Mosby revealed how nutritional studies and experiments were performed in Indigenous communities and residential schools in the 1940s and '50s.
The tests were apparently done, explained Mosby, without the informed consent or knowledge of the Indigenous people involved.
What isn't yet widely known, said Mosby, a professor of history at Ryerson University, is how these experiments are directly connected to Canada's Food Guide.
Government policies were creating conditions of hunger
In the 1940s, federal bureaucrats found that malnutrition was widespread in Indigenous communities and residential schools. But this wasn't new information to many Indigenous people.
"Indigenous people had been arguing for a long time that their kids were hungry in residential schools, that government policies were creating conditions of hunger in their communities," explained Mosby.
The Canadian government began to send researchers to examine these conditions of hunger. In many cases, the researchers found "severe malnutrition," said Mosby.
Some federal bureaucrats and scientists saw the pervasive malnutrition and hunger experienced by Indigenous people as an opportunity to test their scientific theories.
Lionel Pett
The federal Nutrition Services Division was established in 1941 under the leadership of a medical doctor and biochemist named Lionell Pett.
Pett was a "major player" in setting nutritional standards and policy in Canada, said Mobsy. Scientific questions were often on Pett's mind, explained Mosby, questions like what the daily recommended intake for different vitamins and minerals should be. But there was controversy over how to determine dietary standards, said Mosby, and it was challenging to do the kinds of studies that were needed to test Pett's questions.

"It's really difficult to do those kinds of experiments because you need hungry people," said Mosby.
"When Pett began to uncover these accounts of hunger in Indigenous communities and in residential schools, he saw this as an opportunity to put some of these controversies to the test."
The experiments
Pett oversaw a series of nutritional experiments in Indigenous communities. Among these was a long-term study carried out in residential schools which used Indigenous students as experimental subjects.
In 1947, Pett began testing different nutritional interventions on close to 1,000 children in six residential schools across the country. These experiments used the baseline of malnutrition and hunger experienced by Indigenous children in the schools as a way to test "a whole bunch of both interventions and non-interventions," explained Mosby. These experiments included some children, who were known to be malnourished, receiving no changes to their diets in order to act as controls in the experiments.

One intervention included testing an experimental fortified flour mixture on residential school students. There was a federal ban on fortified flour at the time, and there was debate over whether or not to legalize it, explained Mosby. Pett and his colleagues introduced an experimental flour mixture which included substances like bone meal. Pett and the researchers found increased incidences of anemia among the students who were fed the experimental flour.
The federal government's larger social experiment
The nutritional experiments were part of a larger series of "investigations" into the diets of Indigenous people during this period, what Mosby described as the federal government's "social experiment" to transform Indigenous people's diets.

“The most important connection between the nutrition experiments and Canada's Food Guide is Lionel Pett,” said Mosby. “Pett was the architect of Canada's Food Guide.” Canada's Official Food Rules was the country's first food guide. Issued in 1942, it was the precursor to Canada’s Food Guide. (Swift Canadian Co.)
A justification for these experiments, explained Mosby, was a theory going around among scientists and bureaucrats that the so-called "Indian problem" might have been caused by malnutrition and not due to what they saw as "racial traits."
"They took the extremely racist idea that Indigenous peoples were somehow racially inferior, and they suggested that might have had to do with nutrition. And so they took it upon themselves to solve this 'Indian problem' through expert intervention into Indigenous people's diets."
"At the heart of this was this …. willful attempt to ignore the actual cause of the changes in Indigenous people's diets which was colonialism, which was the Indian Act, which was the forced removal of Indigenous people from their lands, the limits placed on Indigenous peoples' livelihoods through regulations on hunting and trapping, through the effects of residential schools — all of these different elements of Canadian colonialism, which led to problems with Indigenous people's diets."
Direct line between nutritional experiments and Canada's Food Guide
"The most important connection between the nutrition experiments and Canada's Food Guide is Lionel Pett," said Mosby. "Pett was the architect of Canada's Food Guide."
Pett was the primary author of Canada's Official Food Rules, which was introduced in 1942 and was the precursor to Canada's Food Guide.
"The nature of the experiments that [Pett] conducted in residential schools was determined based on a whole series of internal debates among nutrition professionals and bureaucrats about Canada's Food Guide and about what a healthy and nutritionally adequate diet looked like."
"Pett used the opportunity of hungry kids in residential schools … who had no choice in what they were going to eat and whose parents had no choice in what they were going to eat … to attempt to answer a series of questions that were of interest to him professionally and scientifically."
"You can draw a direct line between the types of experiments that were being done in residential schools and these larger debates about how they should structure the food guide."
The ongoing impact of the nutritional experiments
"What happened to me because of these experiments?" is a question that Mosby has heard from many residential school survivors.
Following the publication of Mosby's 2013 article which revealed that nutritional experiments were conducted in Indigenous communities and on students in residential schools, Mosby co-authored an article that investigated the long-term health impacts of the widespread malnutrition and hunger experienced in residential schools.
''Hunger was never absent': How residential school diets shaped current patterns of diabetes among Indigenous peoples in Canada' was published in the Canadian Medical Association Journal in 2017 and was co-authored by Mosby and Tracey Galloway, an anthropology professor at the University of Toronto .
"We found that the food served in residential schools, that the level of hunger experienced by kids, had long term health effects not just on survivors themselves, but also on their children."
"The long term impact of that kind of hunger during childhood leads to a whole series of problems, starting with stunting and kids not reaching their growth potential, but leading to a higher incidence of type 2 diabetes, a tendency toward obesity later in life, and a whole range of problems that sort of cascade from there."
These are health problems that impact Indigenous people disproportionately in Canada, explained Mosby. "There's been a tendency over time to argue that there's a genetic basis for this," he said.
"That ignores the fact that …. a lot of these health conditions are produced by Canadian institutions like residential schools."
Mosby hopes his research "puts the lie to" the idea that there's "somehow an Indigenous genetic susceptibility" to health conditions like type 2 diabetes. "In fact, the susceptibility is Canadian colonialism and Canadian colonial policy."
I posted the link. Now you've posted the entire article. The next step is for you to read it and understand it.
 
Toronto Escorts